Police kill unarmed African American about car licence plate


This video from Ohio in the USA says about itself:

Samuel Dubose: Family demands transparency after man killed by university police officer

22 July 2015

The family of Samuel Dubose rallied outside Cincinnati City Hall, demanding transparency after he was shot and killed by University of Cincinnati Police Officer Ray Tensing.

From Vox.com in the USA:

University of Cincinnati police kill unarmed black man during routine traffic stop

by German Lopez on July 23, 2015, 10:20 a.m. ET

A Cincinnati traffic stop over a missing front license plate turned deadly on July 19 when a campus police officer shot an unarmed black man in the head.

University of Cincinnati (UC) police officer Ray Tensing, who is white, fatally shot Samuel Dubose, a 43-year-old black man, after a brief struggle during the traffic stop. The shooting has once again highlighted racial disparities in police use of force — an issue that’s become a matter of national protests and debates since the police shooting of unarmed 18-year-old Michael Brown in Ferguson, Missouri, last August.

Dubose was stopped for missing a front license plate

Tensing, who has five years of experience in law enforcement, stopped Dubose around 6:30 pm when he noticed Dubose’s car didn’t have a front license plate. Tensing asked for a driver’s license, but Dubose handed him a bottle of alcohol, police said at a news conference. Tensing then asked Dubose to step out of the vehicle, at which point a struggle ensued at the door of the car.

The vehicle began moving forward, and Tensing was knocked to the ground, NBC News’s M. Alex Johnson reported. He fired a single shot at Dubose, hitting him in the head and killing him. The car rolled for about a block before it crashed, police said, according to CNN’s Ralph Ellis, Don Melvin, and David Shortell.

Tensing was reportedly wearing a body camera. But police won’t release footage from the device until the investigation is complete.

Mayor John Cranley said at a news conference that the city’s police department will work with UC to update and improve training and policies on use of force. “As a general matter, a pullover related to a license plate should not in a normal course of events lead to lethal force … as it has in this case,” he said.

UC has an agreement with the Cincinnati Police Department to help patrol areas around the campus.

The university police department’s use of force procedure states that campus officers “should not discharge a firearm at or from a moving vehicle except as the ultimate measure of self-defense or defense of another when the suspect is using deadly force,” according to CNN.

City police and Hamilton County prosecutor Joe Deters are investigating the shooting. Tensing is on administrative leave with pay while the investigation continues.

Black suspects are much more likely to be shot and killed by police

Police shooting by race, by Joe Posner/Vox

An analysis of the available FBI data by Vox’s Dara Lind shows that US police kill black people at disproportionate rates: They accounted for 31 percent of police shooting victims in 2012, even though they made up just 13 percent of the US population. Although the data is incomplete, since it’s based on voluntary reports from police agencies around the country, it highlights the vast disparities in how police use force.

Black teens were 21 times as likely as white teens to be shot and killed by police between 2010 and 2012, according to a ProPublica analysis of the FBI data. ProPublica reported: “One way of appreciating that stark disparity, ProPublica’s analysis shows, is to calculate how many more whites over those three years would have had to have been killed for them to have been at equal risk. The number is jarring — 185, more than one per week.”

Subconscious racial biases, known as implicit biases, may explain the disparities. Studies show, for example, that officers are quicker to shoot black suspects in video game simulations. Josh Correll, a University of Colorado Boulder psychology professor who conducted the research, said it’s possible the bias could lead to even more skewed outcomes in the field. “In the very situation in which [officers] most need their training,” he said, “we have some reason to believe that their training will be most likely to fail them.”

There were several high-profile police killings in the past year involving black men and boys. In Ferguson, Darren Wilson killed unarmed 18-year-old Michael Brown. In Ohio, police killed 22-year-old John Crawford and 12-year-old Tamir Rice in separate shootings after mistaking toy guns for actual weapons. In New York City, NYPD officer Daniel Pantaleo killed Eric Garner by putting the unarmed 43-year-old black man in a chokehold.

This November 2014 video from the USA is called Why it’s so rare for police to be prosecuted for killing civilians.

Cops can legally shoot when they reasonably perceive a threat

Police only need to reasonably perceive a threat to legally fire — and the threat doesn’t have to be actually present.

Two Supreme Court decisions in the 1980s, Tennessee v. Garner and Graham v. Connor, set the legal framework for determining when deadly force by cops is reasonable.

Constitutionally, “police officers are allowed to shoot under two circumstances,” David Klinger, a University of Missouri St. Louis professor who studies law enforcement officers’ use of force, said in August. The first circumstance is “to protect their life or the life of another innocent party” — referred to as the “defense of life” standard by police departments. The second circumstance is to prevent a suspect from escaping, but only if the officer has probable cause to think the suspect poses a dangerous threat to others.

The logic behind the second circumstance, Klinger explained, comes from Tennessee v. Garner. That case involved a pair of police officers who shot a 15-year-old boy as he fled from a burglary. (He’d stolen $10 and a purse from a house.) The court ruled that cops couldn’t shoot every felon who tried to escape. But, as Klinger said, “They basically say that the job of a cop is to protect people from violence, and if you’ve got a violent person who’s fleeing, you can shoot them to stop their flight.”

WHAT MATTERS IS THE OFFICER’S “OBJECTIVELY REASONABLE” BELIEF THAT THERE IS A THREAT

The key to both of the legal standards — defense of life and stopping a fleeing violent felon — is that it doesn’t matter whether there is an actual threat when force is used. Instead, what matters is the officer’s “objectively reasonable” belief that there is a threat.

That standard comes from the other Supreme Court case that guides use-of-force decisions: Graham v. Connor. This was a civil lawsuit brought by a man who survived his encounter with police officers but was treated roughly, had his face shoved into the hood of a car, and broke his foot — all while suffering a diabetic attack. The court didn’t rule on whether the officers’ actions had been justified, but said police couldn’t justify their conduct solely based on whether their intentions were good. They had to demonstrate that their actions were “objectively reasonable,” given the circumstances and compared with what other police officers might do.

What’s “objectively reasonable” changes as the circumstances change. “One can’t just say, ‘Because I could use deadly force 10 seconds ago, that means I can use deadly force again now,'” Walter Katz, a California attorney who specializes in oversight of law enforcement agencies, said in August.

In general, officers are given a lot of legal room to use force without fear of punishment. The intention behind these legal standards is to give police officers leeway to make split-second decisions to protect themselves and bystanders. And although critics argue that these legal standards give law enforcement a license to kill innocent or unarmed people, police officers say they are essential to their safety.

On Wednesday, University of Cincinnati police officer Ray Tensing was indicted by a grand jury on murder charges for the July 19 fatal shooting of unarmed 43-year-old Samuel Dubose. The indictment came three days after hundreds of protesters marched through parts of Cincinnati, converging at the University of Cincinnati Police Department to demand the arrest of Tensing: here.

This October 2014 video from the USA says about itself:

Why recording the police is so important

Dashcams and bodycams are intended to prevent police brutality. But do they help when police control the footage?

21 thoughts on “Police kill unarmed African American about car licence plate

  1. Pingback: Sandra Bland, murdered for her #BlackLivesMatter views? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Sandra Bland, after her death in Texas, USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Sarasota, Florida officer dehumanizes arrested homeless man

    Another recent incident highlights the increasingly depraved character of police in America.

    A surveillance video from inside the Sarasota County Jail in Florida shows officer Andrew Halpin throwing peanuts to a handcuffed homeless man as though feeding an animal. As the man struggles to pick up the peanuts from the floor using his mouth, Halpin further dehumanizes him by kicking the peanuts in his direction.

    A witness told the Sarasota Herald-Tribune that Halpin was making “dog commands” while tossing the peanuts at the man.

    “Due to the actions I’ve seen on camera, I immediately initiated an internal affairs investigation,” Sarasota Police Chief Bernadette DiPino said in a statement. Halpin has been placed on paid administrative leave pending the results of the investigation.

    http://www.wsws.org/en/articles/2015/07/30/poli-j30.html

    Like

  4. Pingback: Sandra Bland, after her death in Texas, USA, update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Sandra Bland, other African American women, and police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Selma to Washington civil rights march in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Civil rights march started in Selma, USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Sandra Bland, other African American women, and Texas police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Pro-Sandra Bland clergywoman called ‘Satanic’ by Texas sheriff | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Ferguson solidarity women, after marriage, four years in jail? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Black Lives Matter, news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Singer Janelle Monáe censored for speaking out against police brutality | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: United State police steroid abuse and brutality | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Texas police kill ‘man with hands up’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Sandra Bland, Texas activists don’t forget her | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: After Sandra Bland and Walter Scott, Bernard Scott in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Florida, USA musician Corey Jones killed by police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Sandra Bland’s death, investigate it, petition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Police kill innocent African American in Minnesota | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Charlotte, USA demonstration against police violence, 24 September | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: United States white racist arrested for killing white policemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply to petrel41 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.