From daily The Guardian in Britain:
Syriza can’t just cave in. Europe’s elites want regime change in Greece
Greece’s confrontation with the euro overlords will shape resistance to austerity – and the future of the whole European Union
Wednesday 1 July 2015 20.54 BST
It’s now clear that Germany and Europe’s powers that be don’t just want the Greek government to bend the knee. They want regime change. Not by military force, of course – this operation is being directed from Berlin and Brussels, rather than Washington.
But that the German chancellor Angela Merkel and the troika of Greece’s European and International Monetary Fund creditors are out to remove the elected government in Athens now seems beyond serious doubt. Everything they have done in recent weeks in relation to the leftist Syriza administraton, elected to turn the tide of austerity, appears designed to divide or discredit Alexis Tsipras’s government.
They were at it again today, when Tsipras offered what looked like almost complete acceptance of the austerity package he had called a referendum on this Sunday. There could be no talks, Merkel responded, until the ballot had taken place.
There’s no suggestion of genuine compromise. The aim is apparently to humiliate Tsipras and his government in preparation for its early replacement with a more pliable administration. We know from the IMF documents prepared for last week’s “final proposals” and reported in the Guardian that the creditors were fully aware they meant unsustainable levels of debt and self-defeating austerity for Greece until at least 2030, even on the most fancifully optimistic scenario.
That’s because, just as the earlier bailouts went to the banks not the country, and troika-imposed austerity has brought penury and a debt explosion, these demands are really about power, not money. If they are successful in forcing Tsipras out of office, a slightly less destructive package could then be offered to a more house-trained Greek leader who replaced him.
Hence the European Central Bank’s decision to switch off emergency funding of Greece’s banks after Tsipras called the referendum on an austerity scheme he had described as blackmail. That was what triggered the bank closures and capital controls, which have taken Greece’s crisis to a new level this week as it became the first developed country to default on an IMF loan.
The EU authorities have a deep aversion to referendums, and countries are routinely persuaded to hold them again if they give the wrong answer. The vote planned in Greece is no exception. A barrage of threats and scaremongering was unleashed as soon as it was called.
One European leader after another warned Greeks to ignore their government and vote yes – or be forced out of the eurozone, with dire consequences. Already the class nature of the divide between the wealthier yes and more working-class no camps is stark. The troika’s hope seems to be that if Tsipras is defeated by fear of chaos, Syriza will split or be forced from office in short order. The euro elite insists it is representing the interests of Portuguese or Irish taxpayers who have to pick up the bill for bailing out the feckless Greeks – or will be enraged by any debt forgiveness when they have been forced to swallow similar medicine. The reality is the other way round.
Not only has no German or any other EU taxpayer taken any loss bailing out Greece. The real fear in Brussels and Berlin is not that people in countries such as Spain and Portugal who have taken the brunt of eurozone austerity will oppose relief for ravaged Greece – but that they’ll want an end to austerity and their own debts written off as well.
That’s what they call “moral hazard”. But it has nothing to do with morality and everything to do with a dysfunctional currency union, a destructive neoliberal economic model enforced by treaty and an austerity regime maintained to ensure a return to profitability on corporate terms.
That’s why Merkel and the ECB mandarins want Greece’s surrender. Upstart democratic governments that challenge austerity must be crushed: the real risk of contagion is as much political as financial. This is, after all, a system where unelected institutions and other states have the power to override elected governments – in fact to impose not only policies but effectively governments too, as we may be about to see in Greece. Anti-democratic firewalls are built into Europe’s institutions.
The achilles heel of Syriza has been its simultaneous commitment to ending disastrous austerity and remaining in the euro. That has reflected Greek public opinion. But there was never going to be an honourable compromise with the creditors, or much mileage in trying to persuade the authorities they were good Europeans. For the euro elite, the dangers of Grexit are outweighed by the risk that larger states could follow a successful Greek stand against austerity.
Tsipras and Syriza’s determination to stay in the eurozone come what may has seriously weakened Greece’s hand. The economic dislocation of jumping off the euro train would doubtless be severe in the short term, though the costs of permanent austerity would almost certainly be greater thereafter.
But Syriza insiders say there is little preparation for what anyway may be forced on them. The relentless pressure of the EU bureaucracy demands a strong and clear-headed response. Right now, for example, that means the Athens government immediately taking control of its banks, currently shutting down all transactions.
The worst outcome of this crisis would be for Syriza to implement the austerity it was elected to end. A yes vote in next weekend’s referendum, if it goes ahead, would probably lead to the government’s fall, and almost certainly new elections. But even a no vote, which would offer the best chance for Greece, would need to be followed by more radical measures if the government was going to strengthen its negotiating hand or prepare the ground for euro exit.
The real risk across Europe is that if Syriza caves in or collapses, that failure will be used to turn back the rising tide of support for anti-austerity movements such as Podemos in Spain, or Sinn Féin in Ireland, leaving the field to populists of the right.
Either way, any Greek euro deal that fails to write off unrepayable debt or end the austerity squeeze will only postpone the crisis. If the Syriza government survives, it will have to change direction. Its fate, and its chaotic confrontation with the eurozone’s overlords, is going to shape all of Europe’s future.
Fear-mongering is the enemy of democracy – from Greece to Cameron’s EU referendum: here.
Its totally captivating on what’s happening in the EU. I can’t imagine, say Florida or Arkansas making a a bid to exit the US and our currency. Even though Tsipras “doesn’t want that”.
The difference is that Florida, Arkansas etc. ever since the eighteenth century are non-sovereign ‘states’ (somewhat similar to what are called ‘provinces’ in the Netherlands, ‘regions’ in France, etc.) of an internationally recognized sovereign state, the USA, with ever since the eighteenth century its own currency: the US dollar. And an (at least officially) elected, accountable government, in Washington DC.
While the European Union is a much more loose federation of scores of sovereign states. Though bigger countries like Germany try to undermine the sovereignty of smaller sovereign countries like Greece. The euro is a much more recent currency than the US dollar. The eurozone is also not identical with the European Union: the United Kingdom and Sweden are in the EU, bot not in the eurozone. The European Commission and the European Central bank (and the IMF) are unelected, undemocratic bureaucracies, which, as the Guardian article writes, try to destroy the result of a democratic election in Greece.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Right, and I know that background, even though many decision-makers try to emphasize this collective identity of Europe, almost similarly to America. But the truth is, is that Grexit were to happen then this would destabilize a currency that is very “young” (16 years) and it sort of questions what is the point of the EU in general, if certain powerhouses (Germany, Belgium, and France) wouldn’t be able to wield power over small countries, especially through these economic policies and aid that they provide?
Greek Finance minister’s blog: Why ‘No’ is the only answer
1. Greece’s creditors refused to reduce our public debt and targeted weakest members of our society.
2. Most economists believe debt must be restructured.
3. The Eurogroup agrees but is refusing to commit to it.
4. Europe is sending signals it is ready to soften.
5. Greece will stay in the euro.
6. The future, which depends on a No vote, demands a proud Greece at heart of Europe.
Pingback: Support Greece against austerity, petition | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Solidarity with Greece demonstrators interrupt Angela Merkel | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dijsselbloem, resign after Greek No, Dutch Socialist Party says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘Greeks fight for democracy in Europe’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British trade unionists react to Greek referendum victory | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Anti-austerity in Greece, xenophobia in Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: European Union anti-democratic attack on Greece | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘European Union coup against Greece’, British Greens say | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘European Union austerity will help neo-nazis’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: German corporations exploiting Greece | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Refugees, the German government and neo-nazis | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Racism and anti-racism in Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: European Union against democracy in Greece | Dear Kitty. Some blog