This video says about itself:
26 March 2015
Saudi-led air strikes against the Shia Houthi rebels in Yemen. Anti-aircraft fire over Sanaa, the capital of Yemen. Heavy destruction in a civilian neighborhood of Sanaa. Some pictures are too graphic to show.
From daily The Independent in Britain:
Sunday 29 March 2015
Saudi Arabia’s airstrikes in Yemen are fuelling the Gulf’s fire
World View: Arab intervention in Yemen risks entrenching Sunni-Shia divide and handing a victory to Isis
Foreign states that go to war in Yemen usually come to regret it. The Saudi-led military intervention so far involves only air strikes, but a ground assault may follow. The code name for the action is Operation Decisive Storm, which is probably an indication of what Saudi Arabia and its allies would like to happen in Yemen, rather than what will actually occur.
In practice, a decisive outcome is the least likely prospect for Yemen, just as it has long been in Iraq and Afghanistan. A political feature common to all three countries is that power is divided between so many players it is impossible to defeat or placate them all for very long. Saudi Arabia is backing President Abd-Rabbu Mansour Hadi but the humiliating speed of his defeat shows his lack of organised support.
The threat of further intervention by Saudi Arabia and the Gulf Cooperation Council may be intended to redress the balance of power in Yemen and prevent the Houthis winning a total victory. But Saudi actions and those of the Sunni coalition will be self-fulfilling if the Houthis – never previously full proxies of Iran – find themselves fighting a war in which they are dependent on Iranian financial, political and military backing.
Likewise, the Houthis, as members of the Zaidi sect, were not always seen by Shia in other countries as part of their religious community. But by leading a Sunni coalition Saudi Arabia will internationalise the Yemen conflict and emphasise its sectarian Sunni-Shia dimension.
The US position becomes even more convoluted. Washington had sought to portray its campaign in Yemen against al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) as a success. Drone attacks were supposedly wiping out important AQAP operatives, but the humiliating end result of America’s covert war in Yemen came last week when US Special Operations personnel blew up their heavy equipment and fled the country for the US base at Djibouti. AQAP is becoming a stronger force as the shock troops of the Sunni.
US policy across the Middle East looks contradictory. It is supporting Sunni powers and opposing Iranian allies in Yemen but doing the reverse in Iraq. On Thursday US aircraft for the first time started pounding Islamic State (Isis) positions in Tikrit, 87 miles north of Baghdad. The city has been under assault for four weeks, with 20,000 Shia militia and 3,000 Iraqi soldiers pitted against a few hundred Isis fighters. The Shia militiamen are now reported to have withdrawn but they do not appear to have gone far. Effectively, the battle for Tikrit is being waged by Iranian-directed Shia militia backed by US air power, even if the two sides are rivals as well as allies.
Ultimately, the US may not have much choice. If it refuses to back anti-Islamic State combatants for whatever reason it will be to the benefit of Isis. The numbers tell the story: there are between 100,000 and 120,000 Shia militiamen in Iraq compared with only 12 brigades in the Iraqi army capable of fighting, about 48,000 soldiers, although this total may be inflated. Isis has been conscripting young men across its self-declared caliphate since last October and may have over 100,000 fighters. If the US relies on Iraqi government and Kurdish Peshmerga ground forces alone to put Isis out of business, it will be difficult.
Why did the US finally use its air power at Tikrit, formerly a city of 200,000? First, it was the only help the Baghdad government formally asked for this week. The US may have concluded, as it did with the 134-day siege of the town of Kobani last year, that it could not allow Isis to succeed in Tikrit. Second, if the city did fall, Washington did not want Iran and the Shia militia to get all the credit.
A further motive is that both the US and Iran want to restore some credibility to the Iraqi government and army after their crushing defeats by Isis forces last year. So far the Iraqi army has not recaptured a single city or substantial town from Isis since the fall of Fallujah, 40 miles west of Baghdad in January 2014. Such limited military successes as there have been were won by the militias in the provinces neighbouring Baghdad.
The US-led international coalition opposing Isis also needs to do something to bolster its own credibility. Despite some 2,500 coalition air strike launched against it since last August, the Islamic State has lost little territory. Isis may be battered but it shows no signs of being anywhere near to defeat.
The Independent conducted a series of interviews in February and March with people who had recently left Isis and, while none were sympathetic to it, there was nobody who believed it was going to be destroyed by mounting internal discontent or external military pressure. A prime reason for this is that the Sunni Arab communities in Iraq and Syria are not being offered an acceptable alternative to Isis rule. They are all terrified of becoming the victims of a pogrom that does not distinguish between Isis supporters and ordinary Sunni.
A further feature of life in the Isis caliphate that emerged from these interviews is that it is well organised: it taxes salaries and sales, it conscripts young men of military age, controls education and mercilessly strikes down any opponents. Its stability might be shaken if it suffered a string of military defeats but so far this has not happened.
Air strikes have made it revert to semi-guerrilla tactics, not holding ground against superior forces backed by airpower but counter-attacking briskly when they have moved on or their lines of communication have become longer and more vulnerable. Given the difficulty in capturing Tikrit, it does not look as if an assault on Mosul will be possible for a long time. There seems to be no enthusiasm on the government side [to] retake Fallujah, although it is so much closer to the capital.
Whatever happens in Iraq and Yemen, the political temperature of the region is getting hotter by the day. Looked at from a Saudi and Gulf monarchy point of view, Iran and the Shia are on the advance, becoming either the dominant or the most powerful influence in four Arab capitals: Baghdad, Damascus, Beirut and Sanaa. The Sunni Arabs in Iraq and Syria have linked their futures inextricably and fatally to Isis and other al-Qaeda type organisations. These have military strength, but they make many powerful enemies.
The confrontations between Sunni and Shia, and between Saudi Arabia and its allies and Iran and its allies, is becoming deeper and more militarised. Conflicts cross-infect and exacerbate each other, preventing solutions to individual issues. Thus Saudi intervention in Yemen reduces the chance of a US-Iranian agreement on Tehran’s nuclear programme and sanctions. As these conflicts and divisions spread, the chances of creating a common front that is capable of destroying the Islamic State are getting fewer by the day.
ARAB LEADERS ANNOUNCE JOINT TASK FORCE FOR ‘ARMED INSURGENCIES’ “Arab leaders announced Sunday that they would form a joint military force to intervene in neighboring states grappling with armed insurgencies. It is a dramatic step to quell the unrest that has broken out in the wake of the region’s uprisings, but some analysts warned it could exacerbate the conflicts that have polarized countries and left hundreds of thousands dead.” [WaPo]
Pingback: Saudi airstrikes kill refugees in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi Arabia’s refugee-killing bombs in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop Saudi war on Yemen, United Nations say | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi bombing kills Yemeni factory workers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war on Yemen, dangerous escalation | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war on Yemen threatens Pakistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi monarch wages war, Yemeni children suffer | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States, British corporations help ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Pakistani parliament won’t join Saudi war in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop Saudi war on Yemen now | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain and the Saudi war on Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi air force resumes killing Yemeni civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Ethiopian dictatorship violence against anti-ISIS demonstrators | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war on Yemen means more terrorism, more refugees | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘Dutch government not stopping misguided young people from joining ISIS’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Al Qaeda’s war in Syria, paid by United States taxpayers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi air force kills Yemeni civilians, destroys ancient mosque | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ISIS cruel ‘justice’, where does it originate from? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi Arabian monarchy, British goverment’s allies | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi bombing kills many Yemeni civilians again | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Tony Blair caused terrorism in London, abuses it for warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Palmyra in Syria, ISIS and the CIA | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Refugees and nazis in Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government selling weapons to Bahrain, other dictatorships | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi air force kills 135, not 27, wedding guests | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘British Conservatives soft on Saudi-Qatari-ISIS links’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi air force’s British weapons kill Yemeni civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi warplanes kill Yemeni civilians with British bombs | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi royal air force bombs Iranian embassy in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Tuesday 2nd February 2016
posted by Morning Star in World
AL-QAIDA’S affiliate in Yemen captured the city of Azzan in Shabwah province yesterday, exploiting the chaos of the country’s civil war.
Al-Qaida in the Arabian Peninsula set up checkpoints on roads into the city of 50,000 inhabitants and besieged government buildings.
Last week the militants captured the port city of Mukalla, the capital of neighbouring Hadramawt province.
Yemen is facing a humanitarian crisis after nearly 11 months of bombing — and ground incursions — by the Saudi-led coalition of Arab nations in support of embattled President Abed Rabbo Mansour Hadi.
http://morningstaronline.co.uk/a-1ecc-Yemen-Al-Qaida-group-captures-city-as-humanitarian-crisis-looms#.VrDtu-ZrgdU
LikeLike
Pingback: From Saudi oil to Brussels bombs in Belgium | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Truck massacre in Nice, France | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war on Yemen and Margaret Thatcher | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British war crimes in Iraq, Yemen, Amnesty says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Turkish Erdogan emulates Guantanamo, Saudi Arabia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Ex-dictator of Yemen dies | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi crown prince not welcome, arrest him | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Brazilian soldiers’ bloodbath of slum dwellers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war crimes in Yemen, United Nations report | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘Stop British bombs killing Yemeni civilians’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi war on Yemen, five years | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi regime kills own prisoners of war in Yemen | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop British weapons killing Yemeni civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog