By Bill Van Auken in the USA:
John Bolton’s call for war on Iran
27 March 2015
The New York Times Thursday published a prominent opinion piece entitled “To Stop Iran’s Bomb, Bomb Iran.”
This video from the USA is about (failed) Unites States Republican presidential election candidate John McCain singing ‘Bomb bomb bomb, bomb bomb Iran‘.
The author was John R. Bolton, a former State Department official and, for a brief period, US ambassador to the United Nations, under the administration of George W. Bush. He became an influential figure in the administration after serving as a lawyer in the Bush campaign’s successful operation to steal the 2000 election by stopping the vote count in Florida.
Bolton, it must be said, has been calling for an immediate military attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities—by either Israel or the US, or both—for at least the last seven years. On each occasion, he has warned darkly that unless his prescription for intensive bombing followed by “regime change” was adopted within days, the world would face the threat of an Iranian nuclear attack.
Thursday’s column was no different. “President Obama’s approach on Iran has brought a bad situation to the brink of catastrophe,” Bolton writes. He is referring to the attempt by Washington, together with the other member nations of the UN Security Council plus Germany, to negotiate restrictions on a nuclear program that Iran insists is strictly for civilian purposes in return for easing punishing economic sanctions.
“Even absent palpable proof, like a nuclear test, Iran’s steady progress toward nuclear weapons has long been evident,” according to Bolton. Despite the lack of “palpable proof,” Bolton insists that Iran’s unwillingness to “negotiate away its nuclear program” and the inability of sanctions to “block its building of a broad and deep weapons infrastructure” constitute an “inescapable conclusion.”
Bolton, who has made an entire career of suppressing “inconvenient truths,” allows that he would prefer an all-out US bombing campaign, but would accept a US-backed attack by Israel.
“The United States could do a thorough job of destruction, but Israel alone can do what’s necessary,” he writes. He adds that this military onslaught must be combined with US efforts “aimed at regime change in Tehran.”
What is involved here is an open appeal for the launching of a war of criminal aggression and incitement of mass murder. The unbridled militarism expressed in Bolton’s column would not be out of place in the writings of Hitler’s foreign minister, Joachim von Ribbentrop, the first to hang at Nuremberg after his conviction on charges of crimes against peace, war crimes and crimes against humanity for his role in organizing the Nazi regime’s wars of aggression.
The question arises, why has he been given a forum in the editorial pages of the New York Times, the supposed newspaper of record and erstwhile voice of American liberalism?
The obvious answer is that any differences the Times editorial board—or for that matter the Obama administration—have with Bolton over Iran are of an entirely tactical character. All of them stand by the principle that US imperialism has the unique right to carry out unprovoked “preemptive” war anywhere on the planet where it perceives a potential challenge to its interests.
Not so long ago, Bolton, who personifies this arrogant and criminal policy, and the Times were on the same page politically and on essentially the very same lines he presents in his latest column on Iran.
In 2002, Bolton was Undersecretary of State for Arms Control and International Security and a point man in the Bush administration’s campaign to prepare a war of aggression against Iraq based upon the lies that Saddam Hussein was developing “weapons of mass destruction” and preparing to hand them over to Al Qaeda.
Bolton, described by one of his former colleagues at the State Department as “the quintessential kiss up, kick down kind of guy,” had been an advocate of aggression against Iraq at least since 1998, when he joined other right-wingers in signing an “Open letter to the president” demanding such a war.
In the run-up to war, he played a central role in manufacturing phony evidence of the existence of Iraqi WMD. This included the promotion of the crude forgeries indicating that Iraq was seeking to procure yellowcake (concentrated uranium) from Niger.
During this same period, the Times provided invaluable assistance to this propaganda campaign. Its senior correspondent Judith Miller was working in alliance with administration officials and right-wing think tanks to confirm and embellish upon the lies about WMD. Thomas Friedman, the paper’s chief foreign affairs columnist, was churning out column after column justifying what he readily acknowledged was a “war of choice” against Iraq, justifying it in the name of democracy, human rights and oil.
As the reputed newspaper “of record,” the Times set the tone for the rest of the corporate media, which together worked to overcome popular opposition to a war in the Middle East.
The results are well known. The war claimed the lives of over a million Iraqis, devastated an entire society and threw the whole region into chaos. In the process, some 4,500 US troops lost their lives, tens of thousands more were maimed and wounded and some $2 trillion was expended. A dozen years later, the Obama administration has launched a new war in Iraq, supposedly to halt the advance of ISIS, a force that it effectively backed in the war for regime change in Syria.
No one has ever been held accountable for these war crimes; not Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Bolton and others who conspired to drag the American people into a war of aggression based upon lies. And not the editors of the Times who produced the propaganda that facilitated their conspiracy.
On the other hand, those who oppose war—from Private Chelsea Manning, who exposed war crimes in Iraq, to Sergeant Bowe Bergdahl, who was sickened by the atrocities carried out against the people of Afghanistan—are submitted to a media lynching and then given the full measure of “military justice.”
In publishing Bolton’s column, the Times is making sure that it burns no bridges to the most right-wing and sociopathic layers of the American ruling establishment. While it may differ with them now over an imminent bombing of Iran, future US wars—including against Russia or China, where the propaganda mills of the Times are grinding once again—will undoubtedly bring them back into sync.
Pingback: Saudi Arabia’s airstrikes on Yemen kill civilians, help ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Syrian journalists’ kidnappers Sunni, not Shia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Downfall of McCain aides linked to Burmese dictators | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Senator Chuck Schumer just publicly declared that he will vote to kill the historic Iran nuclear peace deal and urge other Democrats in the Senate to do the same.
There’s no excuse for any Democrat to oppose the deal – least of all Senator Schumer, who is first in line to take over leadership of the Senate Democrats after Senator Harry Reid retires next year.
Tell Sen. Schumer: Don’t lead Senate Democrats into war with Iran.
Thanks for all you do!
Sen. Chuck Schumer: Wrong on Iraq, wrong on Iran, wrong for Senate Democratic leadership
Tell Senator Chuck Schumer:
“Don’t lead Senate Democrats into war with Iran.”
Add your name:
Sign the petition ►
Starting a war with Iran is apparently the top legislative priority for the next leader of the Senate Democratic caucus.
New York Senator Chuck Schumer just publicly declared that he will vote to kill the historic Iran nuclear peace deal and urge other Democrats in the Senate to do the same.1 There’s no excuse for any Democrat to oppose the deal — least of all Senator Schumer, who is in line to take over leadership of the Senate Democrats once Senator Harry Reid retires.
Every day, more and more Democrats are lining up to support the historic, including ones like New York’s junior Senator Kirsten Gillibrand who are under enormous pressure to oppose the deal.2
Chuck Schumer was wrong on Iraq when he voted for war and he is wrong on Iran. Schumer’s decision to join Republicans in attempting to sabotage the Iran nuclear deal once again shows that he is unfit to lead Senate Democrats.
Tell Sen. Chuck Schumer: Don’t lead Senate Democrats into war with Iran.
Schumer is already facing a massive backlash for his dangerous attempt to take us to war with Iran. Even the White House is piling on, with Press Secretary Josh Earnest saying “I wouldn’t be surprised” if Senate Democrats consider Schumer’s decision in picking their next leader.3
With Congress less than 60 days from voting on whether to seal the deal with Iran or sabotage diplomacy and launch a war, progressive activists can’t let Senator Schumer’s warmongering go unanswered.
Beating the drums for war in the Middle East is not a new role for Sen. Schumer. While he has been widely criticized as a tool of Wall Street banks, there has been much less notice given to the fact that Sen. Schumer voted in 2002 to give President George W. Bush a blank check for war in Iraq. 4
With President Obama on the brink of securing an historic deal to limit Iran’s ability to build a nuclear weapon, you’d think the next leader of the Senate Democrats would be organizing his fellow senators in the caucus to support the White House’s diplomatic efforts. But instead Sen. Schumer is rallying Senate Democrats to the warmonger caucus by joining Republicans in a rush to yet another war of choice in the Middle East.
Tell Sen. Chuck Schumer: You were wrong on Iraq, and now you’re wrong on Iran. This is not the Democratic leadership we need in the Senate.
Sen. Schumer is playing a very dangerous game with American blood and treasure. There are only two ways this can go. Either the deal President Obama and our allies secured blocks Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons without war, or we move down the path to almost certain war.
We are less than sixty days from one of the most important votes members of Congress will ever take: Whether to support peacefully dismantling Iran’s nuclear program or choose war. Sen. Schumer needs to decide if he wants to be the leader of the Democratic caucus or join the Republican warmonger caucus.
Thank you for speaking out to stop the next war.
Becky Bond, Political Director
CREDO Action from Working Assets
Add your name:
Sign the petition ►
1. Jennifer Steinhauer and Jonathan Weisman, “Chuck Schumer Opposes Iran Nuclear Deal, Shaking Democratic Firewall,” New York Times, August 6, 2015
2. Lara Friedman, “Members of Congress in Support of the Iran Deal,” APN
3. Edward-Isaac Dovere, “Schumer, White House at war over Iran,” Politico, August 7, 2015
4. Senate vote summary on H.J. Res. 114
© 2015 CREDO. All rights reserved.
Pingback: Rupert Murdoch empire prefers warmonger Donald Trump to its employee Megyn Kelly | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Corbyn ‘insane’ for not invading Iraq, Tony Blair says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Refugees and nazis in Germany | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: German media abuse Paris murders for militarist propaganda | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Clinton-Trump, their last election debate | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Obama’s presidency, an incomplete balance sheet | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: President Trump, more militarism yet | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump elected, a British view | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump, militarism and Hamilton | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British weapons exports to Saudi, Bahraini absolute monarchies | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump parody Christmas songs | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s ‘mad dog’ millionaire Secretary of War | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump and nuclear weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British-UAE dictatorship military cooperation | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump update | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Anti-Semitism, racism, deportation in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump brings Iraq war ‘mastermind’ Bolton back | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: PayPal censors socialist book on Iran | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: No to nuclear war about Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump’s unwelcome visit to Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump threatens war on Iran | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald Trump’s new attacks on Venezuela, Cuba | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi regime kills with British Conservative support | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s Bolton cozies up to Brazilian fascist Bolsonaro | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ‘Mad dog’ Mattis gone, Trump and Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s oil war on Venezuela? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: India, Pakistan, peace, not war! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s aggressive anti-Latin American policies | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States-German governments collision course | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s Iran war, stop it, Sanders says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump wants Dutch cannon fodder in Syria | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Donald’s Trump’s Iran deal wrecking, new scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Trump’s warmonger Bolton wants British cannon fodder | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States warmonger Bolton, buh bye again! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: United States warmonger Trump sacks warmonger Bolton | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Warmonger Trump’s impeachment, sacked warmonger Bolton’s revenge | Dear Kitty. Some blog