Lies about NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ Libya war exposed


This video says about itself:

Mystery Over Who Just Bombed Libya — Solved!

25 August 2014

“Twice in the last seven days, Egypt and the United Arab Emirates have secretly launched airstrikes against Islamist-allied militias battling for control of Tripoli, Libya, four senior American officials said, in a major escalation of a regional power struggle set off by Arab Spring revolts.

“The United States, the officials said, was caught by surprise: Egypt and the Emirates, both close allies and military partners, acted without informing Washington, leaving the Obama administration on the sidelines. Egyptian officials explicitly denied to American diplomats that their military played any role in the operation, the officials said, in what appeared a new blow to already strained relations between Washington and Cairo.

“The strikes in Tripoli are another destabilizing salvo in a power struggle defined by old-style Arab autocrats battling Islamist movements seeking to overturn the old order. Since the military ouster of the Islamist president in Egypt last year, the new government and its backers in Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates have launched a campaign across the region — in the news media, in politics and diplomacy, and by arming local proxies — to roll back what they see as an existential threat to their authority posed by Islamist groups like the Muslim Brotherhood.”*

The Young Turks’ hosts John Iadarola (http://twitter.com/jiadarola), Ben Mankiewicz (http://twitter.com/benmank77) and Wesley Clark Jr. break down the story.

* For more, read the full New York Times story here.

By Ian Sinclair in Britain:

Another nail in the coffin of the case for Libyan ‘intervention’

Monday 23rd February 2015

More untruths surrounding the invasion are coming to light, says IAN SINCLAIR

THOUGH the British press have chosen to ignore it, a recent report in the Washington Times newspaper is the latest nail in the coffin that is the mainstream narrative of the 2011 Nato intervention in Libya.

An intervention, perhaps not coincidentally, which received the support of the vast majority of the British newspapers and 557 wise MPs, with just 13 opposed.

The mainstream narrative runs something like this. After the Tunisian-inspired protests erupted in February 2011, Libyan government forces responded with overwhelming, deadly violence, beating the rebels back to the eastern city of Benghazi. At this point Nato, authorised by the United Nations, set up a no-fly zone, supposedly to protect civilians in Benghazi.

Justifying the intervention, then US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton referred to Kosovo and the Rwandan genocide in an interview with ABC News.

“Imagine we were sitting here and Benghazi had been overrun, a city of 700,000 people, and tens of thousands of people had been slaughtered, hundreds of thousands had fled,” she said. “The cries would be: ‘Why did the United States not do anything?’”

Likewise, speaking to Parliament a couple of days after the operation had begun, British Prime Minister David Cameron said Nato had helped to avoid a “bloody massacre” in Benghazi “in the nick of time.”

However, citing secret audio recordings between an intermediary working for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Libyan government, the Washington Times suggested genocide was not imminent: “Defense intelligence officials could not corroborate those concerns and in fact assessed that Muammar Gadaffi was unlikely to risk world outrage by inflicting mass casualties.”

The report goes onto quote Sarah Leah Whitson, executive director of Human Rights Watch’s Middle East and north Africa division: “At that point, we did not see the imminence of massacres that would rise to genocide-like levels.”

This conclusion is supported by Alan J Kuperman, associate professor of public affairs in the Lyndon B Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of Texas.

“Gadaffi did not perpetrate a ‘bloodbath’ in any of the cities that his forces recaptured from rebels prior to Nato intervention … so there was virtually no risk of such an outcome if he had been permitted to recapture the last rebel stronghold of Benghazi,” Kuperman argued in a 2013 policy brief prepared for the world-renowned Belfer Centre for Science and International Affairs at the Harvard Kennedy School.

At the time there were shocking stories about Libyan government forces using mass rape as a weapon of war and Libyan aircraft bombing peaceful demonstrators. Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch found no evidence for the former. Hugh Roberts, a former director of the International Crisis Group’s north Africa project, found the latter claim to be false too.

“The story was untrue, just as the story that went round the world in August 1990 that Iraqi troops were slaughtering Kuwaiti babies by turning off their incubators was untrue and the claims in the sexed-up dossier on Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction were untrue,” he said.

The Washington Times also highlighted the various attempts made by the Libyan government to push for a negotiated settlement. Early in the conflict the head of the US African Command attempted to negotiate a truce but was ordered to stand down by Clinton’s State Department.

Again, this account chimes with many other reports that show Nato repeatedly ignored ceasefire proposals coming from Libya and the African Union. According to Roberts: “London, Paris and Washington could not allow a ceasefire because it would have involved negotiations… and all this would have subverted the possibility of the kind of regime change that interested the Western powers.”

Today, Libya is a chaotic mess. In November 2014 Amnesty International warned that “lawless militias and armed groups on all sides of the conflict in western Libya are carrying out rampant human rights abuses, including war crimes.” The same month the UN refugee agency reported that nearly 400,000 Libyans had been displaced by the ongoing violence, while the Associated Press noted the Libyan city of Darna had become the first city outside of Syria and Iraq to pledge allegiance to the Islamic State group.

Misinformation and propaganda used as a pretext for war. A war that plays a significant role in destroying an oil-rich nation in the Middle East. Sound familiar? Like Iraq, we should demand a public inquiry into Britain’s involvement in this duplicitous aggression. At the very least all those journalists who backed the intervention need to start asking the searching questions they should have asked back in 2011.

Ian Sinclair is the author of The March That Shook Blair: An Oral History of 15 February 2003, published on Peace News Press.

Washington’s “human rights” imperialism exposed: here.

Advertisements

174 thoughts on “Lies about NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ Libya war exposed

  1. Pingback: Kill African child soldiers, Canadian general says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Trump’s United States neocolonialism in Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Trumps bombs Syria, peace movement reacts | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: British Labour leader on Donald Trump and militarism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: NATO’s ‘new’ Libya bloodbath of civilians, militia men | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Homeless people help Manchester bomb victims | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: From NATO’s Libya child soldier to Manchester terrorist | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Bloodbaths in NATO’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Brussels against Trump, NATO militarism, report continued | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: ‘London perpetrator reported before attack, police did nothing’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Conservatism and terrorism in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: ‘Trump unwelcome in Britain’, London mayor says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: ‘Trump to Britain, don’t postpone, ban’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: British Conservative government covers up Saudi export of terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Donald Trump continuing bloody wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: European Union anti-refugees conference | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: African refugees abused in NATO’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: NATO governments helping war crimes in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Mali war US ammunition kills Dutch soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Dutch soldiers’ union questions neocolonial Mali war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Spanish police brutality, its supporters and opponents | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Trump’s nuclear war in Korea? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: NATO’s ‘humanitarian’ war brought Libya bloodshed, slavery | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: British taxpayers’ money for corrupt Libyan anti-refugee gangsters | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: More Trump neocolonial war in Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Millions of child labourers and slaves | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Protests against Libyan slave markets | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: ‘Indict Libyan slave traders at International Criminal Court’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Slavery in Libya, more protests | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Russia-bashing, pretext for attacking civil liberties | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Stop Libyan slavery, The Hague demonstration | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: From NATO war to Libyan slavery | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: NATO warmongers as pseudo-feminists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: Steven Spielberg’s new film The Post | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: Steven Spielberg’s The Post, film, media and wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Abolish European Union ‘fake news’ witch-hunters, Dutch parliament says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: British Theresa May, Saudi crown prince, partners in crime | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: French ex-president Sarkozy arrested | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: Macron attacks French workers, joins Trump’s war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: British workers against Trump’s, May’s Syria war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: British peace demonstrators speak | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Ariana Grande song commemorates Manchester victims | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Bloody attack on Toronto, Canada pedestrians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Trump, Macron, partners in crime | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: Anti-women far-right mass murder in Canada | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: More military spending than ever | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Donald Trump’s war on Iran? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: Trump loses even most slavish European NATO fans on Iran deal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: Massacre of refugees in NATO’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  50. Pingback: British Big Business-wars revolving door | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.