‘British Daily Telegraph cover-up of HSBC tax dodging scandal’

This video from the USA says about itself:

After Laundering $800 Million in Drug Money, How Did HSBC Executives Avoid Jail?

13 December 2012

The banking giant HSBC has escaped indictment for laundering billions of dollars for Mexican drug cartels and groups linked to al-Qaeda. Despite evidence of wrongdoing, the U.S. Department of Justice has allowed the bank to avoid prosecution and pay a $1.9 billion fine. No top HSBC officials will face charges, either. We’re joined by Rolling Stone contributing editor Matt Taibbi, author of “Griftopia: A Story of Bankers, Politicians, and the Most Audacious Power Grab in American History.”

“You can do real time in jail in America for all kinds of ridiculous offenses,” Taibbi says. “Here we have a bank that laundered $800 million of drug money, and they can’t find a way to put anybody in jail for that. That sends an incredible message, not just to the financial sector but to everybody. It’s an obvious, clear double standard, where one set of people gets to break the rules as much as they want and another set of people can’t break any rules at all without going to jail.”

From daily The Independent in Britain, about the Daily Telegraph (also known as the Daily Torygraph, because of links to the Conservative party, now revealed to be involved in the HSBC bank scandal):

Peter Oborne resignation: Senior writer quits Telegraph dramatically over HSBC allegations

Columnist accuses paper’s owners of suppressing reportage for fear of losing advertising revenue

Adam Sherwin

Tuesday 17 February 2015

A senior writer at the Daily Telegraph has dramatically quit the newspaper after accusing its owners, the Barclay Brothers, of suppressing reports about the HSBC scandal out of fear of losing advertising revenue.

Peter Oborne, the paper’s chief political commentator and an award-winning author, announced his resignation in a blog on the openDemocracy website, in which he accused the Telegraph of committing a “fraud” on readers by burying reports on the HSBC tax scandal.

The journalist quoted a conversation with Murdoch MacLennan, chief executive of Telegraph Media Group, whom he said freely admitted that advertising was allowed to affect editorial at the paper.

Referring to the phone-hacking scandal which hit Rupert Murdoch’s newspapers, Oborne argued that democracy was being undermined by “shadowy” media executives “who determine what truths can and what truths can’t be conveyed” by news organisations.

Mr Oborne detailed a series of investigations about HSBC, and other financial scandals, which he said executives at the newspaper had closed down.

He declared that “democracy itself is in peril” if “major newspapers allow corporations to influence their content for fear of losing advertising revenue”.

The Telegraph called Mr Oborne’s attack “full of inaccuracy and innuendo”. The paper denied that its editorial judgements had ever been compromised by commercial imperatives.

Mr Oborne, an associate editor of The Spectator, who has presented investigations for Channel 4’s Dispatches, criticised his paper’s minimal coverage of the tax evasion scandal which engulfed HSBC and its Swiss banking arm.

He wrote: “You needed a microscope to find the Telegraph coverage: nothing on Monday, six slim paragraphs at the bottom left of page two on Tuesday, seven paragraphs deep in the business pages on Wednesday.

“The Telegraph’s recent coverage of HSBC amounts to a form of fraud on its readers. It has been placing what it perceives to be the interests of a major international bank above its duty to bring the news to Telegraph readers.”

The paper had made a sudden about turn after journalists pursued previous investigations into the bank. Mr Oborne wrote: “From the start of 2013 onwards stories critical of HSBC were discouraged. HSBC suspended its advertising with the Telegraph.

“Its account, I have been told by an extremely well informed insider, was extremely valuable. HSBC, as one former Telegraph executive told me, is ‘the advertiser you literally cannot afford to offend’.

“HSBC today refused to comment when I asked whether the bank’s decision to stop advertising with the Telegraph was connected in any way with the paper’s investigation into the Jersey accounts.

“Winning back the HSBC advertising account became an urgent priority. It was eventually restored after approximately 12 months. Executives say that Murdoch MacLennan was determined not to allow any criticism of the international bank.”

As a result of a 2012 investigation into accounts held by HSBC in Jersey, he claimed: “Reporters were ordered to destroy all emails, reports and documents related to the HSBC investigation. I have now learnt, in a remarkable departure from normal practice, that at this stage lawyers for the Barclay brothers became closely involved.”

Mr Oborne, who wrote regular columns for the paper on what he perceived to be a moral corruption at the heart of Britain’s political culture, accused his bosses of appeasing Chinese interests by refusing to publish critical comment after China barred British MPs from a visit to Hong Kong.

He argued: “An editorial operation that is clearly influenced by advertising is classic appeasement. Once a very powerful body knows they can exert influence they know they can come back and threaten you. It totally changes the relationship you have with them.”

The best of Oborne

“The sackings continued. A little while later I met Mr MacLennan by chance in the queue of mourners outside Margaret Thatcher’s funeral and once again urged him not to take Telegraph readers for granted. He replied: “You don’t know what you are fucking talking about.”

With the collapse in standards has come a most sinister development. It has long been axiomatic in quality British journalism that the advertising department and editorial should be kept rigorously apart. There is a great deal of evidence that, at the Telegraph, this distinction has collapsed.

“I was resigning as a matter of conscience. Mr MacLennan agreed that advertising was allowed to affect editorial, but was unapologetic, saying that “it was not as bad as all that” and adding that there was a long history of this sort of thing at the Telegraph.

“The past few years have seen the rise of shadowy executives who determine what truths can and what truths can’t be conveyed across the mainstream media. The criminality of News International newspapers during the phone hacking years was a particularly grotesque example of this wholly malign phenomenon.”

See also here.

Peter Oborne may be a maverick but his Telegraph revelations are dynamite: here.

57 thoughts on “‘British Daily Telegraph cover-up of HSBC tax dodging scandal’

  1. Pingback: Jimmy Savile is dead, other British child abusers still alive | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: British Daily Telegraph’s links to iffy HSBC bank, new evidence | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: HSBC bank scandal, Dick Cheney and corruption | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Vote Green party, British fashion designer Vivienne Westwood says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Gulliver’s HSBC money’s travels to Switzerland | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: £7.6 million travels to British HSBC bank’s Gulliver | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Crime committed by those considered to be establishment of the 1% rich, the CEOs will not only be subject to prosecution and retired from their position with pay outs of often many millions of dollars, this payment usually is understood to be money paid will not cause further embarrassment to corporations as hush money, the serious nature of exposing corporations is a accident of those who know to much.
    The importance of non exposure of crime in corporations deemed as all part of the pillars of establishment is not to rock the public’s faith in knowing that establishment is as a base operation, crime.


  8. Pingback: British child abuser Sir Jimmy Savile and his political connections | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: How independent are the Guardian, other media? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: HSBC ‘too big to obey banking laws’, and too big to jail? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: HSBC bank’s British election blackmail | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Crisis, but not for rich Britons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: OXI in Greece, no to austerity in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Jeremy Corbyn’s unexpected rise in British Labour | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: British Labour’s Corbyn, smeared as ‘ISIS’ and ‘sexist’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Banks pay no taxes, Britsh government helps | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: 62 richest people own half te world | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Britain’s oligarchical corporate press | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Big Pharma demands taxpayers’ billions in Davos | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: After Murdoch-Blair quarrel, Murdoch-Trump quarrel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: British government’s links to Google tax dodgers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Hillary Clinton’s foundation money from criminal banksters | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: ‘HSBC bank complicit in Mexican drug murders’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: ‘War on terror’ NOT answer to Brussels atrocities, Belgian says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: HSBC bank, Citibank in corruption scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Panama tax-dodging for 1%, austerity for 99% | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Dutch government wants spying on all citizens | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: French workers keep fighting | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Mass support in Britain for Corbyn’s policies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Britain’s anti-refugee pro-tax dodging new Prime Minister Theresa May | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: British new Prime Minister May’s husband helps tax dodging | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Barbara! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: British Blairite goverment, was it ‘competent?’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: Donald Trump confuses British Conservative press | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: Betsy DeVos, Trump’s Secretary of anti-education | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Corporate media and fake news, interview | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: British Conservative Prime Minister scared of debating Labour | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Jeremy Corbyn speech on British general election | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: British election update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: British millionaires richer, millions poorer | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: London Grenfell Tower fire disaster update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: 100,000-300,000 march in London against Conservative-terrorist coalition government | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: European Union boss Juncker disrespects European parliament | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: ‘Centrist’ politics, what is it really? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: British secret police against democracy | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: Paradise Papers, rich people’s scandals worldwide | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Dickens’ Christmas Carol in English theatre | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: Banking and crime in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: British Conservative Telegraph discusses anti-Labour military coup | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  50. Pingback: McDonald’s international tax-dodging exposed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.