Northern Ireland child abuse and secret service MI5


This video about Northern Ireland says about itself:

BBC News & The Today Programme 6 August 2014

The Kincora Boys’ Home was a children’s home in Belfast, Northern Ireland that was the scene of a notorious child sex abuse scandal.

The Belfast News Letter reported that files on Kincora were “conspicuously absent” from the routine January 2013 release of 1982 government papers by the Public Record Office of Northern Ireland (PRONI) under the 30-year rule.

In July 2014 former soldier Colin Wallace said that any new investigation into the abuse at the home should have access to information from intelligence agencies. Wallace said that he received intelligence in 1973 that boys at the home were being abused, but some of his superior officers refused to pass on information. He also said that the Terry and Hughes inquiries did not examine evidence relating to the intelligence services.

In August 2014 a former intelligence officer, Brian Gemmell, said that he also had been ordered to stop investigating allegations of abuse at the home. He said that he learned details of what happened in the home while gathering information on loyalists. He was told he was running two agents who had close links to the home. As well as telling him not to investigate, the senior officer told him to stop running an agent. He had spoken out anonymously before, but dropped his anonymity because he wanted the allegations to be investigated again. (Wikipedia)

From daily The Independent in Britain:

Kincora scandal: Abuse victim seeks Judicial Review over MI5 link to Belfast boys’ home

A former resident of the notorious institution says local inquiry lacks the legal clout to expose the extent of cover-up

James Hanning

Sunday 15 February 2015

A victim of abuse at a notorious boys’ home in Northern Ireland will seek this week to challenge the conduct of Whitehall’s ill-fated investigation into child abuse.

A former resident at the Kincora Boys’ Home in Belfast, supported by other victims, is applying for judicial review into the decision to exclude the home from the London-based inquiry, now chaired by Justice Lowell Goddard from New Zealand. At stake is whether current and former members of MI5 can be forced to give evidence.

Widespread allegations of abuse of residents – including claims that abuse was covered up and allowed to continue unchecked for years because police and the British security services were using the home to blackmail people – are the subject of a separate inquiry in Northern Ireland, the Historical and Institutional Abuse (HIA) inquiry, led by Sir Anthony Hart.

Critics of the HIA claim it lacks sufficient powers to get to the heart of the scandal, and want Kincora to be investigated by the Goddard inquiry. On Tuesday at the High Court in Belfast, lawyers representing a Kincora victim, Gary Hoy, will challenge the decision by the Secretary of State, Theresa Villiers, to leave the Kincora investigation under the control of the HIA. The lawyers want the decision judicially reviewed. The Government confirmed last week that it will oppose the application.

Campaigners say Kincora should be removed from the HIA and included in the Goddard inquiry because of the purported links with London of some of those who abused boys, and because, they say, the HIA will not be able to compel witnesses to attend nor insist on seeing sensitive civil service documents.

Kincora has long cast a shadow over both Northern Ireland and MI5. In 1981, three men were imprisoned for between four and six years for a number of offences relating to systematic sexual abuse of children over a period of years. Previously, a number of whistleblowers had attempted to call a halt to the abuse, but it continued unabated, giving rise to claims that staff were being protected by the security services. Last year, former MI5 officer Bryan Gemmell told The Independent on Sunday that he had expressed concern but was told by his boss in MI5 to keep his nose out of Kincora. He also said that he had been asked by the same person if he thought a known Protestant terrorist might be susceptible to being blackmailed over his homosexuality “because they had film of him”.

Former army press officer Colin Wallace also sought to raise the alarm, but went unheeded.

One Kincora victim, Clint Massey, told The IoS recently: “In those days [the 1970s], there were loads of people over from London. I have always assumed they were senior figures from Whitehall. I certainly heard English accents…. I strongly believe it was an entrapment operation [for the security services]. They hoped to get a handle on the people who visited, to get them to work for them and inform for them.”

Last week, Mr Massey gave evidence to the Police Ombudsman, who is investigating the failure of successive police inquiries to get to the truth. Yesterday he said: “The HIA inquiry needs to be able to summon the senior civil servants. When Whitehall says jump, they jump. But if it’s based here in Northern Ireland, it won’t have the authority.” This view was backed by the Parliamentary Home Affairs Committee on Friday.

HIA inquiry chairman Sir Anthony Hart has sought to reassure critics that his inquiry has sufficient powers. It has sought details of all Kincora-related files held by all UK government departments and agencies. It has secured extra funding and claims that witnesses who co-operate with the inquiry will be immune from prosecution, including offences under the Official Secrets Act.

However, victims’ solicitor Kevin Winters says: “This case has to be taken by the Goddard inquiry, because the applicants and many others believe there was a cover-up. It has never been properly investigated, and the sense of there having been a cover-up is compounded by a very real perception the Banbridge inquiry is not fit for purpose.

“The HIA is not a statutory inquiry and doesn’t have the necessary powers. It is true it can seek to be given those powers, but that would take primary legislation, and we can’t know how quickly that would happen or how effective.

“In the absence of a proper inquisitorial inquiry, this case must be taken on by the Goddard inquiry.

A VICTIM of child abuse at a notorious Belfast boys’ home today won the right to challenge the British government’s refusal to hold an inquiry into the crimes committed there here.

Child abuse cover-up in interests of ‘national security’: here.

Advertisements

18 thoughts on “Northern Ireland child abuse and secret service MI5

  1. The British establishment of institutional violence having the luxury of virtually unabated criminal activity on a scale exceeding all other criminal structures before, with the exception of now, America and as a result of the collapse of power from WW2, the British establishment although having been in decline are still a menacing force having the advantage of people such as media baron Murdoch and other sources of propaganda to contain what is deemed the enemy, the working class, as Thatcher said the enemy within, this symbolically being the miners, more so all those who are classed as the lower class, note the establishment is not the enemy? having a limited access to what the truth is, the records some how disappeared? MI5/6 who are culpable and all part of the systematic servants to perverts of high standing, having no choice than to remain silent for fear of the British public knowing to much on who is governing them, and if the public lost faith and knew what is going on? would potentially lead to the eventual collapse of the present system of those who govern them.
    The weakness of the establishment is fundamentally they have no morals, as shown in history the establishment works out the system of the control of the mind public mind set, if this is not viable the next step is violence, usually the network of propaganda is able to shape what the public need to know as a reasonable reenactment of reality

    Like

  2. Pingback: British ISIS terrorist ‘Jihadi John’ and MI5 intelligence service | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: ‘British police did nothing against politician Cyril Smith’s child abuse’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: British royal in child abuse scandal, ex-policeman says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Collabroration between British MI5 and Hitler’s Gestapo | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: ‘British politician abused children’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: British governmental child abuse inquiry starts | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: British MI5, Margaret Thatcher, child abuse cover-up document | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: British author Doris Lessing spied on by secret police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Shaker Aamer, from Guantanámo torture to hospital | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: British sexually abusive Bishop Peter Ball and Prince Charles | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: MI5 death squads in northen Ireland, inquiry | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Breivik’s party politician in Norwegian paedophile network | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: British establishment child abuse cover-ups | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: British secret police against democracy | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: British secret police plans to murder Irish prime Minister | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: British police spying on the left | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: British MI5 Manchester massacre scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply to donwreford Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.