‘Humanitarian’ wars really oil wars, new study


This video from the USA says about itself:

19 March 2010

Blair Tied to Iraq-Linked Oil Firm

The Guardian of London is reporting former Prime Minister Tony Blair has received payments from a South Korean oil firm with extensive oil interests in the US and Iraq. The company, UI Energy Corporation, hired Blair around the same time its Iraqi consortium struck a controversial oil deal with the autonomous Kurdish government. Blair denies his dealings with the company were linked to Iraq. His dealings with UI Energy were kept under wraps for twenty months after Blair convinced a British government committee it should be kept secret due to market sensitivities.

From daily The Independent in Britain:

Intervention in civil wars ‘far more likely in oil-rich nations’

Once Isis got near oil fields, the US sent drones to strike targets’

Tom Bawden, environment editor

Wednesday 28 January 2015

Conspiracy theorists have long insisted that modern wars revolve around oil.

Conspiracy theorists? Come on, Tom! Conspiracy theorists believe that wars, and everything else, are caused by some mysterious Jewish world conspiracy. Or by some ‘Eurabia‘ conspiracy between Muslims and Europeans. Or by green lizards from outer space. Etc.

While, on the other hand, pro-war politicians in the USA, in Australia, etc. have admitted that, in spite of all ‘humanitarian war’ propaganda, oil did/does play a major role in the Iraq war.

This 2007 video from the USA is called “The Iraq War is largely about OIL.” – Alan Greenspan [George W Bush’s economic ‘czar’].

This May 2008 video from the USA says about itself:

John ‘100 years’ McCain admits Iraq war really about OIL.

This 2008 video from the USA is called Keith Olbermann slams John McCainBLOOD for OIL (Iraq war).

And this 2008 video is about John McCain’s Republican party presidential election running mate: [Sarah] PALIN: “Iraq War IS over OIL“.

This July 2007 video from Australia is called [Australian pro-war] Government admits oil is the reason for war in Iraq.

Critical analysts of war propaganda have pointed out that oil very often is a major factor in today’s wars; often intertwined with mining interests, interests of the armaments industry, of mercenary corporations like Blackwater, of bureaucracies like the CIA and Pentagon, etc. In the case of Iraq, apart from Iraqi oil, there was the fear in the Bush administration that their Saudi royal allies might be in danger. If Iraq would be controlled by United States armed forces, then it would be easier to come to the aid of the Saudi monarchy in case of revolution.

Now research suggests hydrocarbons play an even bigger role in conflicts than they had suspected.

According to academics from the Universities of Portsmouth, Warwick and Essex, foreign intervention in a civil war is 100 times more likely when the afflicted country has high oil reserves than if it has none. The research is the first to confirm the role of oil as a dominant motivating factor in conflict, suggesting hydrocarbons were a major reason for the military intervention in Libya, by a coalition which included the UK, and the current US campaign against Isis in northern Iraq.

It suggests we are set for a period of low intervention because the falling oil price makes it a less valuable asset to protect. “We found clear evidence that countries with potential for oil production are more likely to be targeted by foreign intervention if civil wars erupt,” said one of the report authors, Dr Petros Sekeris, of the University of Portsmouth. “Military intervention is expensive and risky. No country joins another country’s civil war without balancing the cost against their own strategic interests.”

The report’s starkest finding is that a third party is 100 times more likely to intervene when the country at war is a big producer and exporter of oil than when it has no reserves. “After a rigorous and systematic analysis, we found that the role of economic incentives emerges as a key factor in intervention,” said co-author Dr Vincenzo Bove, of the University of Warwick. “Before the Isis forces approached the oil-rich Kurdish north of Iraq, Isis was barely mentioned in the news. But once Isis got near oil fields, the siege of Kobani in Syria became a headline and the US sent drones to strike Isis targets,” he added.

The study, published in the Journal of Conflict Resolution, analysed 69 civil wars between 1945 and 1999, but did not examine foreign invasions. It noted that civil wars have made up more than 90 per cent of all armed conflicts since the Second World War and that two-thirds of these have seen a third-party intervention.

The researchers drew their conclusions after modelling the decision-making process of the third-parties’ interventions. This assessed a wide range of factors such as their military power and the strength of the rebel army, as well as their demand for oil and the level of supplies in the target country. It found that the decision to intervene was dominated by the third-party’s need for oil, far more than historical, geographic or ethnic ties.

The US maintains troops in Persian Gulf oil producers and has a history of supporting conservative autocratic states in spite of the emphasis on democratic reform elsewhere, the report says. However, the recent surge in US oil production suggests the country will be intervening less in the future – with China potentially taking up the role as lead intervener, the report suggests.

Well defended: Britain’s military interventions

When the UK intervened

Britain intervened in the Nigerian Civil War, also known as the Biafran War, between 1967 and 1970. During this period the UK was one of the biggest importers of oil in the world, with North Sea oil production only starting in 1975. BP’s presence in the oil-rich eastern region of the country meant stability in the area was of critical importance.

The invasion of Iraq in 2003, led by the US and the UK, wasn’t covered in the research because it wasn’t a civil war. However, the report notes previous claims that a thirst for oil was “the alleged ‘true’ motivation of the US invasion of Iraq”.

David Cameron was instrumental in setting up the coalition that intervened in Muammar Gaddafi’s Libya in 2011, a country with sizeable oil reserves.

When the UK did not intervene

Britain watched on as Sierra Leone’s Revolutionary United Front, with support from Charles Taylor’s National Patriotic Front of Liberia, attempted to overthrow Joseph Momoh’s government. The resulting civil war lasted 11 years (1991 to 2002) and enveloped the country, leaving more than 50,000 dead.

The UK also opted not to intervene in the Rhodesian Bush War between 1964 and 1979 – a three-way battle between the Rhodesian government, the military wing of Robert Mugabe’s Zimbabwe African National Union and the Zimbabwe People’s Revolutionary Army.

See also here.

The dominant Western media, at the service of the diplomacy of their respective states, have, on the contrary, denounced, in complete bad faith, the ‘deficiencies’ of the United Nations when it could not cover Western intervention policies with its own authority: here.

238 thoughts on “‘Humanitarian’ wars really oil wars, new study

  1. Pingback: Australian pro-climate striking students speak | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: British Museum exhibition, not enough dissent | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: San Diego, USA against Trump’s xenophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Trump jails children for immigrating, new film | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: German Der Spiegel’s warmongering corporate fake news | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Theresa May’s Britain, poverty and Conservative xenophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Dutch government deports refugees to Sudan dictatorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Trump sends more United States soldiers to Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Britons against foreign military interventions | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Trump’s Pompeo’s warmongering speech in Egypt | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Japan’s nazi-friendly war minister resigns | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: ‘Britain, don’t support Trump’s coup in Venezuela’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Donald Trump’s invasion of Venezuela plan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Trump’s oil war on Venezuela? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: New York Times regrets its Afghan warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: British students’ pro-climate protests, reports | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Corporate media warmongering, Media Lens interview | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Dutch disagreement with Trump on Venezuela | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: European Union makes refugees suffer | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: French-Italian oil war in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Children abused sexually in USA for immigrating | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Stop war between nuclear armed India, Pakistan! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Military lawyer jailed for exposing Afghanistan war crimes? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Free Chelsea Manning, her supporters speak | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Donald Trump spends taxpayers’ money on wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Millions on strike against climate change | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: ‘No Trump war for Venezuelan oil’, demonstration | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: British anti-racist demonstrators speak | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: NATO-Yugoslavia war, prelude to more bloodshed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Russiagate, poor substitute for real anti-Trump opposition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Anti-NATO protest in London, 2 April | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Real Neat Blog Award, thank you Charlotte! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: United States prisons horrors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: More bloodshed in NATO’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: Bloodbath in Libya, a British view | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: ‘Humanitarian’ wars, a lie | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: German militarism in the Middle East and Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Theresa May gone, other British Conservatives should follow | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: Sudan military dictatorship kills pro-democracy protesters | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: Saudis tortured, beheaded for peacemongering, pro-democracy demonstration | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: Donald Trump threatening war on Iran | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: G20 summit in Osaka and trade wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Donald Trump’s Fourth of July militarism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Donald Trump’s massive anti-immigrant raids starting | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: US billionaire Epstein, child abuse and money | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: Donald’s Trump’s Iran deal wrecking, new scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Malware attack on program on Wikileaks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: Trump threatens to ‘kill 10 million Afghans’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: Trump’s aggressive anti-Latin American policies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  50. Pingback: Corporate journalist attacks pro-peace Germans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.