Ferguson grand jury was misled

This video from the USA says about itself:

Was Key Grand Jury Witness in Michael Brown Case a Racist, Mentally Ill, Lying Ex-Felon?

17 Dec. 2014

As protests continue across the country over the police killing of Michael Brown, new questions are being raised about the grand jury that failed to indict Ferguson police officer Darren Wilson for shooting Brown.

Many questions center on a woman identified in the grand jury documents simply as “Witness 40.” She told the grand jury that Brown charged at Wilson “like a football player.” Earlier this week, the website TheSmokingGun.com identified Witness 40 as Sandra McElroy. The website described her as a “bipolar Missouri woman with a criminal past who has a history of making racist remarks and once insinuated herself into another high-profile St. Louis criminal case with claims that police eventually dismissed as a ‘complete fabrication.'”

It now appears McElroy may have lied about witnessing the shooting, which occurred 30 miles from her home. On Tuesday, Rev. Al Sharpton said the report about Witness 40 gave new hope to the Brown family. He told the New York Daily News it shows the grand jury was “not a fair process.” We speak about the case with TheSmokingGun.com editor William Bastone. He is the lead author of the article exposing the identity of Witness 40.

Visit the Democracy Now! archive to watch all our reports on the Michael Brown case: here.

By Gabriel Black in the USA:

Ferguson grand juror seeks to speak out against rigged procedure

7 January 2015

A member of the twelve-person grand jury that failed to bring charges against Ferguson, Missouri police officer Darren Wilson for killing unarmed teenager Michael Brown last year is seeking to speak publicly about what he calls a “muddled” procedure that sought to paint Brown as the wrongdoer.

The grand juror, pseudonymously identified as John Doe, filed a case in US district court to exempt him from laws preventing grand jurors from speaking publicly about proceedings they are involved in. He says this is necessary in order to present “truthful information about a matter of public significance” and exercise his First Amendment right to free speech.

The filing claims that the juror believes St. Louis County Prosecuting Attorney Robert McCulloch presented evidence “with the insinuation that Brown, not Wilson, was the wrongdoer.” It adds, “The presentation of evidence to the grand jury investigating Wilson differed markedly and in significant ways from how evidence was presented in the hundreds of matters presented to the grand jury earlier in its term.”

The lawsuit, filed by attorneys for the American Civil Liberties Union, adds to the growing body of evidence suggesting that McCulloch deliberately manipulated the grand jury proceeding in order to protect the killer cop from prosecution.

“Through the lawsuit the gagged grand juror is able to express what we know, and have said to be the case—that the grand jury process was not a legitimate one, but was geared to get a fake judicial finding to exonerate Wilson for the killing of Michael Brown,” said John Burton, a police misconduct lawyer in Los Angeles County and a writer for the World Socialist Web Site.

The killing of Brown sparked months of protests in Ferguson, Missouri and the surrounding suburbs, which were met with a massive militarized police crackdown involving tear gas, rubber bullets and mass arrests.

In addition to twisting evidence to defend Wilson, the filing alleges that “the presentation of the law to which the grand jurors were to apply the facts was made in a muddled and untimely manner compared to the presentation of the law in other cases presented to the grand jury.”

The filing notes the fact that the failure to indict Wilson could have been the result of as few as four grand jurors opposing the prosecution of the killer cop. It argues that McCulloch’s public presentation of the grand jury decision is “not entirely accurate—especially the implication that all grand jurors believed that there was no support for any charges.” The strong implication of this statement is that a significant number of jurors supported prosecuting Wilson.

The brief cites a promise by McCulloch that “every bit of evidence that you have, the testimony of the witnesses who come in, the statements of the witnesses, the physical evidence, the photographs, everything that you have seen and heard will be released to the public.” The lawsuit claims, however, “Although the release of a larger number of records provides an appearance of transparency, with heavy redactions and the absence of context, those records do not fully portray the proceedings before the grand jury.”

Contrary to standard procedure, McCulloch did not call for the grand jury to return any specific charges, but instead shaped the evidence in such a way as to be favorable to Wilson. He then sought to present the decision not to indict Wilson as the impartial judgment of a grand jury.

This lawsuit comes after McCulloch admitted in a radio interview that he knowingly presented perjured testimony before the grand jury. McCulloch allowed 45-year-old Sandra McElroy, an open supporter of Darren Wilson and a self-avowed racist, whose claims he knew to be false, to testify before the grand jury, then drew upon her account heavily in his own report announcing the grand jury’s decision.

The author also recommends:

How the St. Louis prosecuting attorney manipulated the Ferguson grand jury
[3 December 2014]

Political lessons of the Ferguson whitewash
[26 November 2014]

St. Louis County Grand Juror Challenges Lifetime Gag Order: here.

Saying prosecutor Robert McCulloch wrongly created the appearance of unanimity on the grand jury that declined to indict a white Ferguson, Mo., police officer for the killing of an unarmed black man, a member of the jury is suing for the right to speak out. Freeing the juror to speak would help promote a much-needed public airing of issues of police and prosecutorial conduct in a case that has come to symbolize the country’s continuing struggle with race, and the request should be granted: here.

NAACP seeks new grand jury in Ferguson police shooting: here.

A psychology student at Bronx Community College, Corporan said that after what happened in Ferguson, Missouri, he doesn’t know who to be scared of anymore. While residents are wary of street gangs that dominate the area’s neighborhoods, there is also a fear of being harassed by cops “for no reason”: here.

11 thoughts on “Ferguson grand jury was misled

  1. Pingback: United States student questioned by Homeland Security for her views on Ferguson | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: Ferguson prosecutor accused of lying in another grand jury case | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Ferguson, USA solidarity in Derry, Ireland | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Michael Brown killed, ‘no federal proseution’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: ‘Prosecutor in Michael Brown death case misled jury, lied to public’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Kill Michael Brown, scot-free, make Ferguson video, indictment | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Mansur Ball-Bey, another police murder in St. Louis, USA? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Ferguson, USA residents interviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: After 12-year-old Tamir Rice, United States police kill still more people | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Trump militarises United States police | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: US war crimes whistleblower Chelsea Manning freed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.