This video from England says about itself:
Britain’s Hidden Hungry (full episode)
31 October 2012
David Modell investigates the growing importance of charity foodbanks to thousands of hungry people across the UK by following the stories of three users of a foodbank in Coventry.
From daily The Independent in Britain:
Millions of Britons struggling to feed themselves and facing malnourishment
‘Shocking’ figures show that for the first time since the Second World War, the poor cannot afford sufficient calories
Ian Johnston
Sunday 28 December 2014
Millions of the poorest people in Britain are struggling to get enough food to maintain their body weight, according to official figures published this month.
The Government’s Family Food report reveals that the poorest 10 per cent of the population – some 6.4 million people – ate an average of 1,997 calories a day last year, compared with the average guideline figure of about 2,080 calories. This data covers all age groups.
One expert said the figures were a “powerful marker” that there is a problem with food poverty in Britain and it was clear there were “substantial numbers of people who are going hungry and eating a pretty miserable diet”.
The use of food banks in the UK has surged in recent years. The Trussell Trust, a charity which runs more than 400 food banks, said it had given three days worth of food, and support, to more than 492,600 people between April and September this year, up 38 per cent on the same period in 2013.
Based on an annual survey of 6,000 UK households, the Family Food report said the population as a whole was consuming 5 per cent more calories than required. Tables of figures attached to the report reveal the average calorie consumption for the poorest 10 per cent, but the report itself did not highlight this.
Chris Goodall, an award-winning author who writes about energy, discovered the figures while investigating human use of food resources. “The data absolutely shocked me. What it shows is for the first time since the Second World War, if you are poor you cannot afford to eat sufficient calories,” he said.
He also highlights a widening consumption gap between rich and poor. In 2001/2, there was little difference, with the richest 10th consuming a total of 2,420 calories daily, about 4 per cent more than the poorest. But in 2013, the richest group consumed 2,294 calories, about 15 per cent more than the poorest.
The report, published by the Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs, also found that the poorest people spent 22 per cent more on food in 2013 than in 2007 but received 6.7 per cent less.
Liz Dowler, a professor of food and social policy at Warwick University, said that although calorie intake is hard to measure and that there were problems with the way the Family Food data is collected, it was clear that “there are substantial numbers of people who are going hungry and eating a pretty miserable diet.
“The story of people struggling is now beginning to show up in national data sets and that’s a pretty bad sign.”
While the true numbers of people not getting enough to eat was hard to establish from the report, she added: “I think the numbers are quite a powerful marker of the problem. The size and nature of the problem needs more work.”
Professor Dowler said people who were struggling to get enough calories would often turn to high-energy food, such as chips, that can have a low nutritional value. “You can stave off hunger by just having some relatively cheap calories but if you live like that day after day your health will suffer significantly,” she said.
“At the extreme, [malnourishment] is a cliff edge, but mostly it’s not. It’s a slow, miserable grind of bodily impoverishment, where you’re gradually depleting your body’s stores and your strength is way below what it should be. Your skin is very pale, you are exhausted all the time, you feel very low, often extremely depressed and you find it difficult to work.
“Children who are malnourished cannot concentrate at school, have endless coughs and colds and they get sick all the time. It’s a pretty negative existence.”
Susan Jebb, a professor of diet and population health at Oxford University and a member of Public Health England‘s obesity programme board, said people tended to under-report their calorie intake and noted that it did not appear that people were “significantly losing weight”.
However, she added: “There are sub-groups of the population who are in food poverty and who are struggling to have enough to eat.”
Chris Mould, the chairman of the Trussell Trust, said people who used food banks were genuinely desperate. “We talk to people who have had nothing but toast to eat for a week – usually parents because they are trying their best to keep their children fed,” he said.
“This issue has been so significant for so many years now without proper co-ordinated action to try and address the causes, with the people who are responsible [the Government] repeatedly diverting attention from the issues and denying the reality of what the Trussell Trust has been saying, and calling it scaremongering.”
Niall Cooper, the director of Church Action on Poverty, said the situation was “deeply worrying”. “People are desperate and those using food banks are only the tip of the iceberg,” he said. “There are lots of people who are too ashamed and who don’t want to approach a professional to get a referral to a food bank.”
And Imran Hussain, the head of policy at the Child Poverty Action Group, said: “The cost of the basics in life – rent, food and heating – has far outstripped headline inflation, earnings and benefit levels.
“Rather than spending billions on tax cuts largely benefiting the rich, we should be choosing to protect our children from hardship through prioritising affordable housing, tackling low pay and protecting the purchasing power of benefits.”
…
Maria Eagle, Labour’s Shadow Environment Secretary, said it was a “national scandal that so many people are going hungry in the sixth-richest country on the planet, in the 21st century”.
“The Tories’ attitude to the relentless rise in hunger in Britain speaks volumes for who they stand up for. They refuse to accept any responsibility for it, despite the fact that their policies are making it worse,” she said. “Only by tackling the cost-of-living crisis can we begin to see the numbers of people at risk of going hungry decline.
“That is why the next Labour government will raise the minimum wage, ban exploitative zero-hour contracts and abolish the bedroom tax.”
Official figures published by the UK governments’ Family Food report show that millions of the poorest people are struggling to eat enough food to maintain their body weight and are facing malnourishment: here.
A TORY politician fled a furious backlash yesterday after attacking a BBC drama that depicted a single mum struggling to feed her kids and branding those forced to turn to foodbanks as alcoholics, drug users and people with “mental health problems.” Aylesbury Vale District Councillor Mark Winn flew into a rage at the “propaganda” Casualty storyline about a mother-of-two stripped of her benefits via welfare secretary Iain Duncan Smith’s cruel “sanctions” policy: here.
Check Robert Neilsen on “is the Irish potato famine” genocide? a contribution on this subject of some 800 blogs on this topic, you can catch up on the latest commentaries without trawling all the comments, with reference to this topic, I suggest the lower classes are being punished for being poor, globally the lower classes are being mistreated, the rich are becoming richer, the Western allies are in collaboration to destroy the poor, I suggest this is genocide, the novelty of slowly killing people by the political agenda is this death process cannot be identified as to being murder.
The reason for the killings is squeeze out those who are deemed as surplus stock that has no use to the controlling elements of Western society, as Germany destroyed the underclass in we assume a more direct method, this British elite, are insidious in its program of subtle killings.
The middle classes are somewhat removed from this for reasons such as class identity, and are busy making money for the same reason they do not want to be on the funeral pyre, of obscurity, as you can see in grave yards the marble angels and the wealth accrued to be seen as someone of stature.
LikeLike
Pingback: Britain, riches, poverty and the Murdoch empire | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Homeless schoolchildren in New Orleans, USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Scrap British Trident nuclear weapons now | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: 1% of people, half the world’s wealth | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: End destructive austerity, in Greece and Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Solidarity with Greek people in London | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British psychologists campaign against cuts and social inequality | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop wasting food in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop wasting food in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: English poem on war, peace and economics | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Petroleum fat cat demands £14 million, poor people starve | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Child poverty in Britain rising | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Friday, 28 October 2016
SANCTIONS LINKED TO FOODBANKS
NEW University of Oxford research confirms there is a strong link between increased benefit sanctions and higher foodbank use.
The University of Oxford researchers analysed four years of Trussell Trust foodbank data and found an increase in ten Jobseeker’s Allowance sanctions per 100,000 adults was associated with five more adults needing foodbanks.
In response, The Trussell Trust, which runs a network of over 420 foodbanks, calls for a true ‘yellow card’ warning system to stop people falling into crisis. Research by the University of Oxford, released yesterday, finds a ‘strong, dynamic relationship’ between sanctioning and food bank usage: there is a link between people having their benefit payments stopped and an increase in referrals to foodbanks.
Researchers analysing Trussell Trust foodbank data from across 259 local authorities between 2012 and 2015 found that as the rate of sanctioning increased within local authorities, the rate of foodbank use also increased.
In response to this new evidence, The Trussell Trust proposes changes to the current ‘yellow card’ warning being piloted by the Department for Work and Pensions in Scotland, and calls for the recommendations to be extended across the UK.
Currently, the system in Scotland gives notice a sanction is pending and 14 days to appeal. The Trussell Trust recommend a warning system with a non-financial ‘yellow card’ penalty to first try and engage the person in a constructive dialogue without the immediate threat of financial penalty.
Adrian Curtis, Foodbank Network Director for The Trussell Trust, said: ‘The findings from this ground-breaking study by the University of Oxford tell us once and for all: the more people sanctioned, the more people need foodbanks.
‘We now need to listen to the stories behind the statistics: families go hungry, debts spiral, and the heating doesn’t go on even as temperatures drop. There is much to be hopeful about – we’re very pleased to see sanctioning rates have decreased and that the new Secretary of State has announced that work capability re-assessments for ESA claimants with incurable or progressive illnesses have been scrapped.
‘However, we still see people being referred to our foodbanks who have been sanctioned unfairly. A true “yellow card” system, which gives people a non-financial warning first, would mean less people thrown into crisis and ultimately, less people needing foodbanks.’
The research is funded by The Trussell Trust and supported by a Wellcome Trust Investigator Award.
http://wrp.org.uk/news/12623
LikeLike
Pingback: Over 40,000 British pensioners die from hunger, cold | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: I, Daniel Blake, film review | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Children hungry in Theresa May’s Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Conservatives and food banks, B-52s parody song | Dear Kitty. Some blog