Re-starting Iraq war will make things worse

This video from London, England is about 15 February 2003: The day the world said no to war in Iraq.

By Sami Ramadani from Iraq, in British daily The Guardian:

The last thing Iraq needs is more misguided military action by the west

Past interventions helped create Isis and al-Qaida. Have Britain and the US not learned the lessons?

Thursday 11 September 2014 19.15 BST

In announcing his new strategy to tackle the terrorist insurgency in Iraq, President Obama has put the US on a dangerous collision course with Syria, the Lebanese resistance led by Hezbollah, and the biggest obstacle to US and Israeli regional hegemony: Iran.

The so-called war on Isis (Islamic State) is, in reality, the same war that the US and Britain abandoned last year due to public opposition, the anti-war vote in Britain’s parliament, and the determination of Iran and Russia to back Syria. But the savagery of Isis and the beheading of two American hostages have dampened public opposition to further military intervention in the region, and has boosted hawks in Washington and London.

A few days before Obama’s war-on-Isis speech, the former secretary of state Henry Kissinger revealed the US roadmap in much clearer terms than Obama could, stating that despite Isis occupying large parts of Iraq and Syria, the biggest danger to US interests is still Iran; Isis is vile but containable, but Iran is the really dangerous power, he stressed. This also chimes with Israel’s policies, as described by its recently departed ambassador to Washington that Iran-backed forces are more dangerous than al-Qaida. “The greatest danger to Israel is by the strategic arc that extends from Tehran, to Damascus to Beirut,” he said.

Broader still, Obama’s war will inevitably heighten tensions with Russia, China and their allies. If we include the confrontation lines being drawn by Nato along Russia’s borders, and US escalation of its military presence in the South China Sea, the evolving new cold war could rapidly degenerate into the greatest threat to world peace since 1939.

Following David Cameron’s agreement with Obama last week over a campaign against Isis, attention is now focusing on whether Britain should join in the airstrikes. But beyond hitching a ride on the US military juggernaut, has Cameron seriously considered the consequences of new war in Iraq and Syria? The policies of US, Britain and Nato helped to create Isis and al-Qaida in the first place. Doing more of the same could have similar consequences and cost thousands more lives.

And when the US, Britain and France decided in 2011 to back the armed groups in Syria, their goal was to bring about regime change – but the result was to strengthen the more brutal terrorist groups such as Isis and the al-Nusra Front, the “official” al-Qaida affiliate in Syria. For three years US allies Qatar and Saudi Arabia supplied billions of dollars to fund armed groups in Syria, while Nato member Turkey opened its borders for US and Nato supplies, as well as terrorists from across the world, to pour into Syria.

Have Obama and Cameron acknowledged any of that? On the contrary. The US and Britain have now decided to give even more arms and backing to Syrian “moderate” armed groups, who were the allies of Isis until recently and are still the allies of al-Nusra.

In Iraq the US and Britain created state institutions to entrench sectarian divisions with the aim of implementing the so-called Joe Biden plan to divide Iraq into three ethnic regions with, importantly, a very weak central government.

The US is now consolidating its military presence in Iraqi Kurdistan with the aim of creating yet another client force in the region. The president of the Kurdistan regional government, Masoud Barzani, is in fact harbouring former Saddam Hussein officers and allies of Isis who played a leading role in the fall of Mosul and the disintegration of three divisions of the US-founded Iraqi army, in the face of the Isis advance.

The real enemies of Isis and terror groups in the region are Syria, Iran, the Iraqi Christians, Yazidis, and Shia, Sunni, Kurdish and Turkmen people. If the US and Britain really want to fight Isis and terrorism – rather than using the Isis savagery to further their strategic aims of dominating the region and its resources – then they should reverse the policies they have been pursuing for decades. They should stop backing the armed groups in Syria and Iraq, and instruct their obedient allies in Qatar, Saudi Arabia and Turkey to do the same.

Britain: SPEAKING in a House of Commons debate on Wednesday, former Chancellor Kenneth Clarke described the US-UK Iraq invasion as ‘disastrous’ and a ‘catastrophe’, which has contributed to the ‘anarchy’ in the region today. Clarke warned British Prime Minister David Cameron against launching airstrikes against ISIL and its Islamic State, IS, saying there would be ‘political outrage’ with ‘very dubious legality’ to take military action without a vote in the House of Commons: here.

33 thoughts on “Re-starting Iraq war will make things worse

  1. Hammond’s Isis claim quashed

    Middle East: Bungling Foreign Secretary Philip Hammond was publicly humiliated by PM David Cameron yesterday on the issue of possible British involvement in air strikes against Islamic State.

    Mr Hammond told reporters in Berlin: “Let me be clear, Britain will not be taking part in air strikes in Syria. I can be very clear about that.”

    But he was swiftly overruled by the Prime Minister’s Office, which maintained that Mr Cameron “has not ruled anything out.”


  2. Pingback: Iraq, Syria United States military escalation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: The Low-Down on Obama’s ISIS Plan - Twenties Chic

  4. Pingback: Britain and Iraq war re-start | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: ISIS in Iraq and Syria, new book | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: United States taxpayers’ money for Syrian jihadists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: British airstrikes on Syria may be illegal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Iraq war illegal, British deputy PM repeats | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: The propaganda of the American-Iranian dispute - RiyadhVision

  10. Pingback: Re-starting Iraq war helps, doesn’t stop, ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Iraq war re-start cartoon | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: More money for Syria war, more hunger for refugees | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Korean religious cults’ pseudo-peace movements | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Re-starting Iraq war helps ISIS terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and human rights | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Syrian Kurds, ‘terrorists’ in NATO eyes, victims of ISIS terror | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: ‘Terrorist’ Syrian Kurds, not NATO bombs, stop ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: War against ISIS, or for oil? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Anti-war demonstration, London, 25 September | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: British peace movement against Iraq war re-start | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Another bloody Iraq war for Britain? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Iraq war re-start and BBC militarist propaganda | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Iraq war re-start, false pretexts | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: US airstrikes make humanitarian crisis worse, Red Cross says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Dutch socialists against Iraq war re-start | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: US airstrikes make humanitarian crisis worse, Red Cross says | The Socialist

  27. Pingback: Cameron spying more on British citizens, on Saudi autocracy’s advice | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: British Muslim women against ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Turkish invasion of Syria? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: British citizens’ safety and wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: United States Vice President Biden apologizes for honesty on Turkey and ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Bombing Iraqi civilians does not stop ISIS crimes | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: United States soldiers fight Iraqi demonstrators | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.