‘New’ Libyan air force attacks city, NATO no-fly zone?


This 19 April 2011 video is called Libya War: Victims of NATO bombing in Sabha.

Early in 2011, pro-Gaddafi armed forces in Libya fought against armed rebels. During that fighting, the governmental air force bombed ground targets.

The governments of NATO countries then had been, until recently, been quite friendly with the Gaddafi regime. Until Gaddafi proposed that the Libyan share of Libyan oil income should increase at the expense of the share of foreign Big Oil corporations. That, presto! changed the minds of NATO countries’ politicians. Suddenly, they started worrying about human rights in Libya.

The Libyan air force bombs became a pretext for demanding a no-fly zone in Libya, enforced by NATO air forces. Then, “mission creep” started. The no-fly zone evolved into a NATO air war on Libya. It killed not only pro-Gaddafi soldiers, but also many civilians (like in Sabha city, as the video shows), and sometimes even anti-Gaddafi fighters. However, NATO politicians insisted the war was not about regime change, but only because of worries about human rights. Then, that supposedly limited war evolved into an unlimited war which was about regime change. And then, that war about regime change evolved into lynch mob murder of Gaddafi (on the orders of French President Sarkozy, analysts say).

Sarkozy and Gaddafi

This photo shows Sarkozy when he still had different ideas about Gaddafi.

On 18 January 2014, Dutch NOS TV reported that the Libyan government had proclaimed a state of emergency. In southern Libya, around Sabha, the air force of the pro-NATO government of the ‘new’ Libya had attacked ground targets. At least thirty people died.

Now, will NATO politicians stay true to their worries about human rights of early 2011? The bombs of the ‘new’ Libyan air force have just as many lethal risks for civilians as those of Gaddafi’s old Libyan air force. Will NATO try to impose a no-fly zone, like three years ago?

Don’t count on it. The present Libyan government is the result of NATO’s war on Libya. The present regime in Tripoli so far has not asked for a bigger Libyan share in Libyan oil profits, unlike Gaddafi then.

Suppose they would ask now for more oil money. Then, very suddenly, NATO politicians might discover the human rights violations of the ‘new’ Libya: the torturing and killing of people for being black; the killing of people for being Christian; the downgrading of human beings’ rights for being women; etc. etc. Then, but only then, the corporate media in NATO countries, which so far have been rather silent about these horrors, may suddenly start to have those horrors on their front pages in big letters, and on prime time TV. In order to goad public opinion in NATO countries into the next “humanitarian” war on Libya.

Enhanced by Zemanta

35 thoughts on “‘New’ Libyan air force attacks city, NATO no-fly zone?

  1. Pingback: ‘New’ Libyan air force attacks city, NATO no-fly zone? | JOURNAL LE COMMUN'ART

  2. Pingback: Abolish British Trident nuclear weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Cracking Chrispmouse Bloggywog Award, thanks Barbara! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Egyptian diplomats kidnapped in ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Shine On Award, thank you whatuful! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Tony Blair supports dictators | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Scores of refugees drown off Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Ukrainian government kills its own civilian people | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Ukrainian government kills its own civilian people | The Socialist

  10. Pingback: Pro-peace protest against NATO conference in Wales | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: British peace movement against Iraq war re-start | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: NATO kills Libyan rebels | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: NATO’s allies killing each other and civilians in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: ‘New’ Libya warplane kills Greek sailors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: French government re-starting NATO’s Libya war? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Libya war based on lies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Libya’s oil war kills civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Tony Blair caused terrorism in London, abuses it for warmongering | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: British government spent thirteen times more on bombing Libya than on reconstruction | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: NATO war brought ISIS to Libya, Tunisia, Tunisian Prime Minister says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Libyan demonstrations against ISIS, other paramilitaries | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: More Libyan blood for more Libyan oil? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: ISIS, Libya and the New York Times | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Bloodshed in ‘new’ Libya continues | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: NATO’s ‘new’ Libya bloodbath of civilians, militia men | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Bloodshed in Libya, worse than ever | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: California massacre by PTSD Afghan war veteran | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: More bloodshed in NATO’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Another ‘humanitarian’ oil bloodbath in Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Libyans protest against French Macron’s war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Wedding guests killed in NATO’s ‘new’ Libya | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.