Don’t celebrate start of bloody World War I


This video about World War I is called Lions led by Donkeys Re-upload.

By Solomon Hughes in Britain:

It’s Gove who betrays the soldiers of World War One

Friday 17th January 2014

SOLOMON HUGHES finds that the last thing the generation who fought in the ‘Great War’ wanted was to mark the start of the carnage

MICHAEL GOVE announced that the government wants to celebrate the anniversary of the start of the first world war in the Daily Mail.

The Education Secretary attacked “left-wing myths” that the war was “a series of catastrophic mistakes perpetrated by an out-of-touch elite.”

For Gove it was a “just war” which was “seen by participants as a noble cause.”

Gove wants to enlist the Great War dead in his own desire to “challenge existing left-wing versions of the past designed to belittle Britain and its leaders.”

But Gove is doing what none of the people who actually went through WWI would dream of — celebrating the declaration of the war, not its end.

Who commemorates the outbreak of war instead of the arrival of peace?

Who would want to have parades and celebrations to remember 1914 instead of 1918?

Gove does. Cameron does. But the people of 1918 did not.

Gove believes he is the man to blurt on about the “heroism, and sacrifice, of our great-grandparents.”

But when it ended, those “great-grandparents” rejected any idea of celebrating the start of war.

Britain declared war in August 1914.

During WWI there were annual official celebrations of the declaration of war in August.

So on August 4 1917 there was a “great patriotic meeting” in the Queen’s Hall.

The prime minister and the archbishop of Canterbury addressed the 2,500-strong audience, where, according to the programme, “the singing of Rule Britannia will conclude the proceedings.”

But by August 1918 the mood had darkened.

The official Remembrance Day marking the anniversary of the declaration of war was a more sombre church service for the king and his ministers, where “any display of pageantry, any musical decorativeness was avoided.”

The archbishop of Canterbury still spoke about “glory” and “heroic sacrifice” but also said: “The world has been learning by fearful experience what war actually is.

“The facts have been burned into our living souls. To most of us war used to seem a far-off thing.

“There was about it a romance and glamour which pushed its horribleness not out of sight, but out of the foreground.

“Four years have taught us much.”

These lessons of “war’s unspeakable hatefulness” meant soldiers “are the first to resolve that, please God, a repetition of its ghastly horrors shall become impossible among men.”

As soon as the war ended in 1918 all suggestions of having any ceremony to mark the outbreak in 1914 disappeared.

I’ve searched through the Times and the Mail of August 1919 and there is no suggestion of commemorating the start of war.

Anyone who was actually in the war only wanted to remember the end, not the beginning.

The first attempt to remember the war by the generation that fought it came on “Peace Day” on July 19 1919.

A government committee led by foreign secretary Lord Curzon planned elaborate celebrations.

They were a big event, with a huge “victory march” by troops in central London and bonfires around the country.

But many servicemen wouldn’t even celebrate peace because they were so angry about the conditions they faced on returning from the trenches.

The Times records that “several hundred ex-servicemen in the Chertsey area have decided against participating in any peace celebrations as a protest at not having secured all their rights.”

This was one of many rejections of Peace Day by soldiers’ organisations angry at the lack of “homes fit for heroes” or decent jobs for ex-servicemen following their terrible fighting.

Gove wants to celebrate the start of the war, but many of the war’s veterans wouldn’t even celebrate its end.

In Luton the Federation of Discharged Sailors and Soldiers were enraged that they were not allowed to have their own ceremony in the Town’s Wardown park.

They felt the official ceremony at the town hall was the kind of empty “patriotic” guff Gove wants to revive now.

Discharged soldiers went to the town hall and made speeches complaining about “the inadequacy of pensions” for former servicemen and “the fact that no steps had been taken to provide a peace feast and entertainments for discharged men and their families.”

The demobbed soldiers were so angry that their Peace Day protest turned into a riot.

The crowd set fire to the town hall, leaving it a burned-out shell.

The Mail reported that “the police charged again and again but the crowd remained supreme.”

Rioters dragged pianos from a looted shop into the street “and played Keep the Home Fires Burning, afterwards breaking up the pianos and using the wooden and iron supports as weapons.”

Alongside the violence the Mail reports that “gramophones were also brought out of the shop and set playing in the streets. It was a kind of an orgy for an hour or two. All this time the town hall was blazing.”

A platoon of active soldiers finally restored order, although there were more riots the next day as Luton ex-servicemen demanded their comrades be released from the police station.

The July Peace Day was never repeated.

The only “celebration” of the war that finally stuck with the generation who fought it was Armistice Day, quietly remembering the November 11 1918 end of the war.

This was marked in 1919 by “two minutes silence” — what the Times called “two short minutes to thanksgiving, rejoicing, pity, lifelong pride and grief,” a time when “many were experiencing again the grief of the war.”

It was only this silence that was acceptable to the people who went through the war.

So any remembrance of the war beginning disappeared in 1918. Even attempts to celebrate peace that looked too bombastic could provoke protests and riots by ex-servicemen.

The only way to properly reflect the feelings of those who lived through the first world war is to ignore Gove and sign up to the No Glory campaign at www.noglory.org.

Enhanced by Zemanta

31 thoughts on “Don’t celebrate start of bloody World War I

  1. A story of returned servicemen and their interpretation of what happened to them and the aftermath, so much for the glorification of war? interestingly enough, my Father often quoted to me was, when you are conscripted, or the call up, “is the army will make you into a man”, it is ironic he did not get called up in WW2, as he was a manager of a Cooperative store, classed as being of essential services, hypocrisy is so deeply embedded within the human soul, you may wonder if within the conditions of evolution, the nature of camouflage in most life forms, this coloring of the true nature of man’s inner intention as opposed to what is a given front, is the outcome of evolution, and this condition is firmly implanted within, that escape is impossible as with being in the realm of the orbit of a black hole.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Texas taxpayers’ money for blaming worlds wars on Enlightenment and Darwin | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: British government recruits child soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Rich get richer, meet at WEF in Davos | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Rudyard Kipling, British anti-World War I poet | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: British suffragette Sylvia Pankhurst, new biography interview | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Young British soldiers traumatized by wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Australian government celebrates World War I bloodbath | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: German miltarism reviving | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: World War One, a hundred years ago | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: World War I, don’t celebrate it | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: British ballet about World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Play about World War I on English stage | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: British conscientious objectors against World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Scottish peace movement against Cameron ‘celebrating’ World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Italian futurism, exhibition in New York City | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: British suffragettes and World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: British World War I media censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: British anti-World War I MP John Burns commemorated | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Wars killing people, 1914-2014 | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Scottish peace activists commemorate World War I dead | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Against glorification of World War I in London tonight | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: War is not peace, lesson of World War I | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: US entry into World War I, exhibition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: World War I and British railway workers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Dance, theatre and World War I in Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Downton Abbey TV series and history | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: More German taxpayers’ money for militarism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Einstein’s General Relativity theory, 1915-2015 | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: United States artist Georgia O’Keeffe exhibition in Canada | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: German painter Emil Nolde and nazism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.