‘NSA, GCHQ spying is illegal’

This video from the European Parliament is called Presentation of final Draft Report on US NSA surveillance by MEP Claude Moraes.

By Robert Stevens:

European Parliamentary rapporteur denounces NSA/GCHQ spying as illegal

14 January 2014

A draft report from the European Parliament’s civil liberties committee rapporteur, Claude Moraes, condemned mass surveillance by the US National Security Agency (NSA) and Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) as illegal.

Moraes is a Member of the European Parliament for London and deputy leader of the European Parliamentary Labour Party.

The 52-page report was authorised as part of the parliament’s inquiry into the revelations by US whistle-blower Edward Snowden. Set up last July, its remit includes, “investigating the alleged surveillance activities of US authorities as well as any carried out by certain Member States.”

The draft calls on the US and British governments to end the mass collection of data of citizens. Revelations disclosed since June have “resulted in compelling evidence of the existence of far-reaching, complex and highly technologically advanced systems designed by US and some member states’ intelligence services, to collect, store and analyse communication and metadata of all citizens around the world on an unprecedented scale and in an indiscriminate and non-suspicion-based manner.”

It notes, “US NSA intelligence programmes allowing for the mass surveillance of EU citizens through direct access to the central servers of leading US internet companies (PRISM programme), the analysis of content and metadata (Xkeyscore programme), the circumvention of online encryption (BULLRUN), access to computer and telephone networks and access to location data, as well as to systems of the UK intelligence agency GCHQ such as its upstream surveillance activity (Tempora programme) and decryption programme (Edgehill); believes that the existence of programmes of a similar nature, even if on a more limited scale, is likely in other EU countries such as France (DGSE), Germany (BND) and Sweden (FRA)”.

Without stating that what is being constructed is the basis of a police state, it warns the spying programmes are “yet another step towards the establishment of a fully-fledged preventive state, changing the established paradigm of criminal law in democratic societies, promoting instead a mix of law enforcement and intelligence activities with blurred legal safeguards, often not in line with democratic checks and balances and fundamental rights, especially the presumption of innocence.”

It calls on the US and European Union states to “prohibit blanket mass surveillance activities and bulk processing of personal data,” and questions the “legality, necessity and proportionality” of programmes such as the NSA’s Prism and the UK’s Tempora. (See “Communications of millions subject to US-UK spying”)

Pointing to the sharp tensions between the major powers underpinning the report, the draft states that it is “very doubtful” that such mass collection of information is only guided by the fight against terrorism. Involving “the collection of all possible data of all citizens,” this “points therefore to the possible existence of other power motives such as political and economic espionage.”

As well as calling on the US to bring its laws governing the activities of its intelligence services into line with international law, it adds that the UK, Germany, France, Sweden and the Netherlands need to revise legislation, to comply with the European Convention on Human Rights.

Moraes refers to the “chilling” way that “journalists publishing Snowden’s revelations have been intimidated by state authorities.”

The draft includes a section warning “that mass surveillance has potentially severe effects on the freedom of press, thought and speech as well as a significant potential for abuse of the information gathered against political adversaries” and “emphasises that these mass surveillance activities appear also to entail illegal actions by intelligence services and raise questions regarding extra-territoriality of national law.”

The draft criticises the move by the British government and GCHQ officers last July to destroy files from Snowden that the Guardian held at its London HQ. It condemns the illegal detention at Heathrow Airport on August 18 last year by British police, of David Miranda, the partner of the former Guardian journalist Glenn Greenwald. This, it notes, was an interference with the right of freedom of expression and in violation of article 10 of the European Convention on Human Rights.

The inquiry was established amid growing tensions between the EU and the US. The draft says bluntly, the “mass surveillance of citizens and the spying on political leaders by the US have caused serious damage to relations between the EU and the US and negatively impacted on trust in US organisations acting in the EU”.

While criticising the mass spying organised mainly by the NSA and GCHQ, the draft does not call for an end to state surveillance, only its “reform”. It is “vital that transatlantic cooperation in counter-terrorism continues,” the draft asserts, adding that the European Parliament, “is ready actively to engage in a dialogue with US counterparts”.

Reforms need “to ensure that the use of surveillance and data processing for foreign intelligence purposes is limited by clearly specified conditions and related to reasonable suspicion or probable cause of terrorist or criminal activity,” it urges.

The fact is that there are no serious moves by the US and Britain to dismantle any of the mass surveillance programmes they operate. The intelligence agencies criticised in the report refused to “co-operate with the inquiry the European parliament has been conducting on behalf of citizens,” the draft states.

The committee voted last week in favour of inviting Snowden to testify from Russia, where he is in forced exile, via video-link.

Two votes were cast against by members of the UK’s Conservative Party. Timothy Kirkhope used the occasion to heap further slanders on Snowden, stating that he had “endangered lives” and adding that inviting him to speak was a, “highly irresponsible act” by a committee that “continues to act like a school debating society that is oblivious to the risks the West now faces, and the tactics used by our enemies”.

In a barely veiled threat Kirkhope added, “At least if Snowden wants to give evidence to MEPs he will now have to come out of the shadows and risk his location being discovered.”

Kirkhope’s comments follow statements last week by the Republican chairman and ranking Democrat on the US House Intelligence Committee, who said a classified Pentagon report had concluded Snowden’s revelations damaged the US military.

“The vast majority of the material was related to the Defense Department, and our military services,” not NSA operations, Chairman Mike Rogers said, adding, “Clearly, given the scope and the types of information, I have concerns about operations that would be ongoing in Afghanistan.”

C.A. Dutch Ruppersberger, the committee’s ranking Democrat since 2011, claimed that that Snowden had stolen approximately 1.7 million intelligence files that “concern vital operations of the US Army, Navy, Marine Corps and Air Force.”

In a scurrilous statement, he added, “Snowden handed terrorists a copy of our country’s playbook and now we are paying the price, which this report confirms”.

Last Friday, outgoing NSA deputy director, John C. Inglis, said there were no plans to end the bulk collection of the phone data of all Americans. “I’m not going to give that insurance policy up, because it’s a necessary component to cover a seam that I can’t otherwise cover,” he said.

On January 17, Obama is to announce his response to the December advisory panel recommendations on the NSA. (See “Obama advisory committee whitewashes US spying programs”) It has been well-trailed that he will announce few changes if any to the existing set-up.

Germany dismisses report “no-spy” talks with US close to collapse: here.

Enhanced by Zemanta

77 thoughts on “‘NSA, GCHQ spying is illegal’

  1. Pingback: NSA spying on offline computers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: British war crimes in Iraq news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: NSA spying on 200 million phone messages a day | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Canadian spies lied to the courts | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: European parliament invites whistleblower Edward Snowden | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Edward Snowden’s life threatened by United States spies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: NSA spying is illegal, Privacy Board says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: United States NSA recruiting child spies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: NSA spying on political views of millions of of cellphone users | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: NSA spying scandals continue | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: NSA spying, Edward Snowden and the European Parliament | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: NSA spying threatens journalism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: NSA, Australian economic spying on Indonesia and United States lawyers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Over one million petition for Brazilian asylum for Snowden | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: NSA spying on WikiLeaks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Edward Snowden voted Rector of Glasgow University in Scotland | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: NSA, GCHQ spies inflitrating online groups | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: NSA, GCHQ spy on millions of Yahoo users | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: NSA spies on billions of people, Snowden says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Worldwide NSA political and economic spying, new Snowden documents | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: ‘British secret police spying on Parliament’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: NSA spying on Merkel investigation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: British government spies on anti-Iraq war Green party | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Cameron’s hypocrisy on Magna Carta and British civil liberties | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: British government spying on everyone | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Stop British governmental mass spying on citizens | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Dutch Internet provider sues British spies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: United States NSA spying even on its Bahraini royal allies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: United States NSA role in censoring British daily Guardian | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Edward Snowden against British government’s new massive spying plans | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: British, United States spying violating international law | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: German government okays spying on USA, Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: British government treats Bahraini human rights defender as a criminal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: British corporate involvement in US drone assassinations | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: Cameron spying more on British citizens, on Saudi autocracy’s advice | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Bush’s spying on Yahoo customers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: NSA world wide spying, new Snowden revelations | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Edward Snowden wins Right Livelihood Award | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: British government’s Libyan torture scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: British spy boss demands Internet companies should help spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: ‘British spies in child abuse cover-up’ | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Merchants of death’s luxury dinner in Tower of London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: British spies spy on Scotland Yard in torture scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Corrupt British Blairite warmonger Hoon loses court case | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: Brown Muslims terrorists, white nazis not terrorists? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: Writers, media self-censoring because of NSA spying | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Charlie Hebdo massacre abused for attacking civil liberties | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  48. Pingback: British secret police spying on journalists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  49. Pingback: British secret police spying on Parliament | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  50. Pingback: Collabroration between British MI5 and Hitler’s Gestapo | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.