This video is called CARTA: Bipedalism and Human Origins-Comparative Anatomy from Australopithecus to Gorillas.
From the BBC:
4 June 2013 Last updated at 07:03 GMT
Human ancestors‘ diet changed 3.5 million years ago
By Melissa Hogenboom, Science reporter, BBC News
A new analysis of early human teeth from extinct fossils has found that they expanded their diets about 3.5 million years ago to include grasses and possibly animals.
Before this, humanlike creatures – or hominins – ate a forest-based diett similar to modern gorillas and chimps.
Researchers analysed fossilised tooth enamel of 11 species of hominins and other primates found in East Africa.
The findings appear in four papers published in PNAS journal.
Like chimpanzees today, many of our early human ancestors lived in forests and ate a diet of leaves and fruits from trees, shrubs and herbs.
But scientists have now found that this changed 3.5 million years ago in the species Australopithecus afarensis and Kenyanthropus platyops.
Their diet included grasses, sedges, and possibly animals that ate such plants. They also tended to live in the open savannahs of Africa.
The new studies show that they not only lived there, but began to consume progressively more foods from the savannahs.
Researchers looked at samples from 175 hominins of 11 species, ranging from 1.4 to 4.1 million years old.
Their diet was analysed from the chemical make up of their teeth, identifying the carbon isotopes within them.
The ratios of different types of carbon atoms, or isotopes, in fossils can give clues to what a fossil creature ate because different foods have different carbon isotope signatures.
“What we have is chemical information on what our ancestors ate, which in simpler terms is like a piece of food item stuck between their teeth and preserved for millions of years,” said Dr Zeresenay Alemseged, from the California Academy of Sciences, co-author on two of the papers.
“Because feeding is the most important factor determining an organism’s physiology, behaviour and its interaction with the environment, these finds will give us new insight into the evolutionary mechanisms that shaped our evolution.”
It is not yet clear whether the change in diet included animals, but “the possible diets of some of our hominin kin” has been considerably narrowed down, Dr Matt Sponheimer, lead author of another of the papers, told BBC News.
A new habitat
“We now have good evidence that some early hominins began using plant foods that are not used in abundance by living African apes today, and this probably led to a major change in the way they used the landscape.
“One consequence could be that the dietary expansion led to a habitat expansion, as they could travel to more open habitats more efficiently.
“We know that many early hominins lived in areas that would not have readily supported chimpanzees with their strong preference for forest fruits. It could also be argued that this dietary expansion was a key element in hominin diversification.”
The study has also answered, at least in part, what researchers have long been speculating – how so many large species of primate managed to co-exist.
“They were not competing for the same foods,” said Prof Thure Cerling from the University of Utah, who led one of the research papers.
‘The modern human’
“All these species who were once in the human lineage, ventured out into this new world of foods 3.5 million years ago, but we don’t yet understand why that is.”
As well as looking at non-human primates, the researchers analysed fossils from other animals from the same era and did not find any evidence of a change in diet.
This combined research highlights a “step towards becoming the modern human”, said Dr Jonathan Wynn from the University of South Florida, who led the analysis of Australopithecus afarensis.
“Exploring new environments and testing new foods, ultimately might be correlated with further changes in human history.”
These four complementary studies give a persuasive account of shifts in dietary niche in East African hominins, Dr Louise Humphrey from the Natural History Museum in London, told BBC news.
Australopithecus was the ape-man ancestor of humans and walked upright
As many as nine different species may have existed two-four million years ago in Africa
The males were up to twice the size of the females. However, even the largest male was quite short compared to modern humans, at only 150cm tall
The species with hefty jaws and massive faces – known as robust australopithecines – are believed by many scientists to belong in a separate genus, Paranthropus
Source: BBC Nature
Multiple studies of carbon isotopes in fossil hominin teeth from southern and eastern Africa document the change from woodland to grassland diet which marked a major step in the evolution of early humans: here.
A newly discovered skull, some 1.8 million years old, has rekindled debate over the identity of humanity’s ancient ancestors. Uncovered at the Dmanisi site in the Caucasus in Georgia, “Skull 5” represents the most complete jaw and cranium from a turning point in early human history: here. And here.
- Early Human Ancestors Transformed Diet Around Lucy’s Time (livescience.com)
- Even Our Ancestors Never Really Ate the “Paleo Diet” (blogs.discovermagazine.com)
- Human ancestors’ diet changed 3.5 million years ago (ancientfoods.wordpress.com)
- Human Ancestors? (theimmortalslegend.wordpress.com)
- Human Ancestors’ Diet Began Including Grasses and Animals 3.5 Million Years Ago (hngn.com)
- Answers in Genesis claim new Australopithecus fossil is human! (evoanth.wordpress.com)
- ScienceShot: Lucy’s Svelte Look (news.sciencemag.org)
- Is Lucy a chimp ancestor? (evoanth.wordpress.com)
- ‘Ancient humans’ used toothpicks (bbc.co.uk)
- UT Austin Anthropologists Confirm Link Between Cranial Anatomy and Two-Legged Walking (utexas.edu)
Evolution is predictable, study suggests:
Evolution punishes selfish jerks over time, study finds:
Two biologists have published evidence that
evolution doesn’t favor the selfish — disproving,
they claim, a theory popularized last year.
Findings could simplify human lineage:
Several ancestral forms of humans were really one
species, not separate ones as previously thought,
according to new research.
Pingback: Mammuth ancestor discovery in Namibia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: 3.3-million-year-old stone tools discovery in Kenya | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: New ‘apeman’ species discovery in Ethiopia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Earliest Australians earlier than thought | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Human ancestor discovery in Ethiopia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: How human ancestors ate | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Paranthropus prehistoric hominins, video | Dear Kitty. Some blog