From BirdLife:
Hiding in plain sight: New species of bird discovered in capital city
Tue, Jun 25, 2013
A team of scientists with the Wildlife Conservation Society, BirdLife International, and other groups have discovered a new species of bird with distinct plumage and a loud call, living not in some remote jungle, but in a capital city of 1.5 million people.
Called the Cambodian Tailorbird Orthotomus chaktomuk, the previously undescribed species was found in Cambodia’s urbanised capitol Phnom Penh and several other locations just outside of the city including a construction site.
Scientists describe the new bird in a special online early-view issue of the Oriental Bird Club’s journal Forktail.
The grey wren-sized bird with a rufous cap and black throat lives in dense, humid lowland scrub in Phnom Penh and other sites in the floodplain. Its scientific name ‘chaktomuk’ is an old Khmer word meaning four-faces, perfectly describing where the bird is found: the area centered in Phnom Penh where the Tonle Sap, Mekong and Bassac Rivers come together.
Only tiny fragments of floodplain scrub remain in Phnom Penh, but larger areas persist just outside the city limits where Cambodian Tailorbird is abundant. The authors say that the bird’s habitat is declining and agricultural and urban expansion could further affect the bird and its habitat. BirdLife will assess the species’ conservation status for the Red List on behalf of the IUCN.
This same dense habitat is what kept the bird hidden for so long. Lead author Simon Mahood of WCS began investigating the new species when co-author Ashish John, also of WCS, took photographs of what was first thought to be a similar, coastal species of tailorbird at a construction site on the edge of Phnom Penh. The bird in the photographs initially defied identification. Further investigation revealed that it was an entirely unknown species.
“The modern discovery of an un-described bird species within the limits of a large populous city – not to mention 30 minutes from my home – is extraordinary,” said Mahood. “The discovery indicates that new species of birds may still be found in familiar and unexpected locations.”
The last two decades have seen a sharp increase in the number of new bird species emerging from Indochina, mostly due to exploration of remote areas. Newly described birds include various babbler species from isolated mountains in Vietnam, the bizarre bare-faced bulbul from Lao PDR and the Mekong wagtail, first described in 2001 by WCS and other partners.
Co-Author Jonathan C. Eames OBE of BirdLife International’s said: “Most newly discovered bird species in recent years have proved to be threatened with extinction or of conservation concern, highlighting the crisis facing the planet’s biodiversity.”
See also here.
Related articles
- Bird species on the brink (theage.com.au)
Why don’t you give photo credit to the photographer???
LikeLike
Forgotten, now I have 🙂
LikeLike
I have written to Birdlife and asked them if I can use their photos, and they replied to me that you must have a writtent consent from the photographer.
LikeLike
This photo is not from BirdLife.
LikeLike
I saw it in Birdlife , and the Birdlife staff said that all photos on Internet are copyright protected except those who belong to the public domain.
LikeLike
The Birdlife article has a different photo:
http://www.birdlife.org/community/2013/06/hiding-in-plain-sight-new-species-of-bird-discovered-in-capital-city/
This one, as captioned; is from AFP, on the Australian Broadcasting Corporation site.
LikeLike
It’s not the first time you breach copyright laws, you did it as well with the leucistic Chaffinch!
LikeLike
On https://dearkitty1.wordpress.com/2013/05/09/white-chaffinch-in-scotland/
you can read, ever since the photo is there:
“Photo courtesy of Ian Cairns”.
LikeLike
Methinks that Wildlife Extra also are very strict with photos and that you must have a written consent from the photographer , and you didn’t write the photographers name under the photo as is stated in the International copyright laws!
LikeLike
It’s stated in the International copyright laws that the photo must follow by a copyright mark , followed by the photographers name and website!
LikeLike
The photographer’s name is in the caption.
LikeLike
In the caption, that’s not right! It’s stated that it must follow the photo! You communists juts blame others when you steal other peoples photos!
LikeLike
It is a bit strange to divert this discussion to communism, as
a) it has nothing to do with the photo
b) I am not a member of any political party or group. In South Africa during the apartheid regime, the government called anyone disagreeing with racial discrimination a “communist”. Those very wide definitions should belong to the past, not to 2013.
LikeLike
An example of a coffect article using the bird photo is here:
http://raxacollective.wordpress.com/2013/06/27/wildlife-conservation-society-announces-discovery-of-new-bird-species/
LikeLike
The word “coffect” is new and unknown for me.
At the link which you mention, the upper photo has a caption under the photo. The lower photo, at the end of the article, does not have a caption at all; neither visible with mouseover, nor underneath the photo.
LikeLike
And I see that you still haven’t corrected your photos with a photo credit?
Sorry about the spelling but it was too early in the morning
LikeLike
I found the word “coffect” on the Internet (“people hating coffect” etc.) but without an explanation what it meant. It is not in Wikipedia.
I put photo credits in my captions. Both in the “title” tag and in the “alt” tag of pictures. This way, both Microsoft Explorer users and people with other browsers like Firefox can see the content of the captions.
LikeLike
I can’t see any captions ! Why discuss with Internet trolls at all!
LikeLike
Mouse over the pictures.
LikeLike
That’s not too good, but methinks the upper photo caption referrs to the lower as well!
LikeLike
It probably does, but you can’t see that at the lower photo.
LikeLike
I have solved the issue. It’s stated in the article that you must click on the pic, and then pops the Guardian article up with the photographers name.
LikeLike
True. But if people don’t click on the link to the Guardian article, then they don’t see who the photographer is (it is not the same photographer as the upper photo).
LikeLike
OK, but still not according to the International copyright laws, where it’s stated that a photo must follow by a photographers name and website.
LikeLike
Do you have a link for that rule?
LikeLike
http://www.roniloren.com/blog/2012/7/20/bloggers-beware-you-can-get-sued-for-using-pics-on-your-blog.html
LikeLike
Clicking on that link, I get the message:
“This service is currently unavailable for scheduled maintenance. We will return no later than 4:00AM EST following this maintenance window. ”
I will look later.
LikeLike
The link tells about Roni Loren’s experience with this issue, but does not quote or link to the official rules (on captions, in picture tags or under the photo, etc.)
LikeLike
The link is working now! And its stated that all material that you will use on blogs etc must have a written consent from the photographer, exaxctly as Birdlife stated. And you have violated those rules!
I have never used a photo or article from the Internet without using a permission from the photographers or writers. For example many of my bird piccies are by Andrew Adams and whale piccies by George McCallum. Copyright protected material which I’m allowed to use.
Note as well, the piccies don’t need to have a copyright sign, they are anyway under copyright rules.
LikeLike
Pingback: Forest birds of New Britain threatened | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: One Lovely Blog Award, thanks theseeker! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: New Spanish bird atlas | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: European birds comeback | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Good giant ibis news from Cambodia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Endangered Mekong giant catfish caught, released in Cambodia | Dear Kitty. Some blog