Afghans illegally imprisoned by British forces


This video from the USA is called Americas Secret Afghan Prisons: Investigation Unearths New US Torture Site in Afghanistan 1 of 2.

This video is called Americas Secret Afghan Prisons: Investigation Unearths New US Torture Site in Afghanistan 2 of 2.

From the BBC:

29 May 2013 Last updated at 04:00 GMT

Afghans ‘unlawfully held’ by UK forces at Camp Bastion

By Dominic Casciani and Clive Coleman, BBC news

British forces are detaining up to 85 Afghan nationals in a holding facility at Camp Bastion, in what could amount to unlawful detention and internment, documents obtained by the BBC suggest.

UK lawyers acting for eight of the men said their clients had been held for up to 14 months without charge.

They compared it to when the public became aware of Guantanamo Bay and want the UK High Court to free them.

Camp Bastion in Helmand province is the largest British military base in Afghanistan, housing nearly 30,000 servicemen and women.

Legal documents seen by the BBC suggest that an estimated 85 suspected insurgents are being held at the base in a temporary holding facility.

‘Exceptional circumstances’

British forces in Afghanistan, operating as part of the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf), are allowed to detain suspects for 96 hours.

However, in “exceptional circumstances” – for example, to gather critical intelligence to protect lives – they can hold them for longer periods.

The Ministry of Defence has previously said that Isaf neither has the power nor the facilities to intern detainees in Afghanistan.

But nor can the British pass them to the Afghan authorities, after Defence Secretary Philip Hammond imposed a ban on handing over suspects to Afghan forces last November because of fears over ill-treatment.

UK lawyers acting for eight of the men said their clients were arrested by British soldiers in raids in villages in Helmand and Kandahar provinces and have been held for between eight and 14 months without charge.

They claimed it amounted to unlawful detention and internment.

Lawyers for the men, whom the BBC has chosen not to name over fears for their safety, launched habeas corpus applications at the High Court in London on 18 April, with a full hearing due in late July.

Habeas corpus, in this context, argues for the right to be brought before a court to determine whether their detainment is lawful or not.

The lawyers argue that the MoD should release the men because the British army has no power to continue holding them.

‘Perfect storm’

A senior government lawyer, James Eadie QC, described this situation in court as a “perfect legal storm” because the Army suspects each detainee of links to insurgents.

The families of two of the men who appear to have been held the longest said they were arrested in spring last year and interrogated in the weeks that followed.

But legal papers state their interrogation ended “many months ago”.

Last week, the two were allowed access to lawyers but they have still not been told why they are being held and they have not been charged with any crime.

The families only established where the men were being held with the help of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

One, a teenager, has been held for 14 months, while the other, a 20-year-old father, has been held for 12 months.

In legal papers Dan Squires, a barrister for the 20-year-old, told the High Court: “He has not been granted access to lawyer nor brought before a court.

“He does not know how long he is to remain detained or for what purpose. He has asked whether he will be transferred to Afghan authorities but had been told they do not consider that he has committed any criminal offence and so do not want to receive him.”

‘Suspected killers’

In preparatory legal arguments at the High Court on 22 April, Mr Justice Collins told the government that the case raised serious questions about the British army’s power to hold suspects in Afghanistan, because the UK could not operate a Guantanamo Bay-style prison – referring to the US facility in which enemy combatants can be held indefinitely without trial.

UK forces operate in Afghanistan as members of Isaf.

Isaf was established by a UN Security Council resolution which “authorises the member states participating in Isaf to take all necessary measures to fulfil its mandate”.

The Security Council resolution does not include a power to intern detainees on the basis that they are regarded as a threat to national security or otherwise.

Detention procedures

Phil Shiner, lawyer for eight of the men, said: “This is a secret facility that’s been used to unlawfully detain or intern up to 85 Afghans that they’ve kept secret, that Parliament doesn’t know about, that courts previously when they have interrogated issues like detention and internment in Afghanistan have never been told about – completely off the radar.

“It is reminiscent of the public’s awakening that there was a Guantanamo Bay. And people will be wondering if these detainees are being treated humanely and in accordance with international law.”

See also here.

20 percent of Afghan children never reach the age of five: here.

5 thoughts on “Afghans illegally imprisoned by British forces

  1. Pingback: United States torture of Afghan prisoners | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: War crimes in Afghanistan not investigated, Amnesty says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Unindicted prisoners in Bagram, Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: NATO injures Afghan schoolgirls | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.