German militarism, Afghanistan and Qatar


This Reuters video says about itself:

A spokesman for the Afghan defence ministry says his ministry condemns the killing of six Afghan soldiers by German troops.

By Johannes Stern in Germany:

Germany extends military mission in Afghanistan and arms Qatar

25 April 2013

On April 18, German foreign minister Guido Westerwelle (Free Democratic Party) and defence minister … de Maizière (Christian Democratic Union) announced that the German army (Bundeswehr) will keep at least 800 soldiers in Afghanistan beyond the official date for the withdrawal of NATO combat troops at the end of 2014.

On the same day, the German media reported that Germany is sending 62 tanks and 24 howitzers to the semi-feudal state of Qatar.

The offensive by German imperialism in Central Asia and the Gulf region is closely coordinated with the US, which Berlin regards as a key ally for the enforcement of its geo-strategic and economic interests internationally.

Thus far, the US government of President Barack Obama has not announced how many troops it intends to keep in Afghanistan and is still negotiating with the regime of Hamid Karzai terms of their deployment, which Washington insists must include complete immunity from prosecution for war crimes and other offences.

The top US commander in Afghanistan, Gen. Joseph Dunford, told a Senate hearing last week that he will make a recommendation in November 2013 after seeing how Afghan puppet troops perform during the so-called summer fighting season. Reported proposals have ranged from as few as 6,000 troops to as many as 20,000.

Following a NATO ministers’ meeting In February, de Maizière announced that Washington had decided to leave 8,000 to 12,000 troops behind after 2014, but US defence secretary Leon Panetta quickly called the report inaccurate.

Germany has played a leading role in the occupation of the country since the invasion of Afghanistan. Since 2006, Germany has been a so-called “lead nation” in the International Security Assistance Force mission and heads the ISAF Regional Command North, which covers nine provinces and an area of more than 162,000 square kilometres.

Germany is the third largest contributor of troops after the United States and Britain and will play a leading role in the ISAF successor mission, “Resolute Support,” after 2014.

The Foreign Office describes Germany’s role in the new strategy for Afghanistan occupation as follows: “As part of this model, the armed forces would be involved in Kabul. In addition, Germany would take responsibility in northern Afghanistan, as the ‘framework nation’ for all local training, consulting and support services…. After two years, Germany will then focus on the area of Kabul.”

In other words, Germany is planning an indefinite presence in Afghanistan and participation in the long-term military occupation of the country together with its NATO allies. It will advise the imperialist-installed puppet government in Kabul and train and support the Afghan military in suppressing domestic opposition by the Afghan people to foreign occupation.

In common with the US ruling class, the German bourgeoisie also regards Afghanistan as strategically important for its interests. Afghanistan represents a bridgehead between the resource-rich regions of the Middle East and Asia, and also has its own considerable natural resources.

Germany has extensive interests in the resources of the region and already has raw material partnerships with Kazakhstan and Mongolia. German imperialism is intensifying its military activities in order to satisfy the hunger of the German economy for resources and energy.

The World Socialist Web Site commented recently on an article in Handelsblatt that made clear that Germany is making intensive preparations to once again wage war over resources. Many of the important raw materials for the German economy such as rare minerals, copper ore, iron ore and lithium are to be found in Afghanistan.

The extension of the Afghanistan mission is also linked to Germany’s upgrading of the Qatari military. Both are aimed at increasing the influence of German imperialism in the Middle East and Central Asia in close military cooperation with Washington.

The delivery of German tanks to Qatar valued at €1.89 billion was announced just as the United States concluded its own huge arms deal with its allies in the Middle East. According to the New York Times, the US is supplying missile systems and fighter jets worth about US$10 billion to Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and Israel.

The arms are directly linked to the preparations for a direct military intervention in Syria and a war against Iran, which have been intensified in recent days.

At the start of his Middle East tour, US defence secretary Chuck Hagel announced on Sunday that the arms deal sends a “very clear signal” to Iran. “The military option is one option that remains on the table, must remain on the table.” He added that the US intelligence agencies were investigating whether the Syrian government of President Bashar al-Assad has used chemical weapons.

For some time, the Obama administration has threatened direct military intervention in Syria in the event of any alleged use of chemical weapons by the Assad regime. On Tuesday, the Israeli intelligence chief, Brigadier-General Itai Brun, claimed that Syria “has increasingly used chemical weapons”.

In bilateral talks last week between German chancellor Angela Merkel and the prime minister of Qatar, Sheikh Hamad bin Jassim Al-Thani, it became clear that the German arms sales to Qatar are directly bound up with preparations for war against Syria and Iran.

Merkel declared that, together with Al-Thani, she believed “there should be no nuclear-armed Iran” and “that Assad has lost his legitimacy.”

Germany and Qatar have long been driving forces in the preparations for war against Syria. Qatar plays a central role in financing and arming the majority of Sunni extremist rebel groups in Syria, which serve as imperialism’s shock troops in the country. Germany has set up two Patriot missile defence systems in Turkey, and both the German Navy and the German Federal Intelligence Service are involved in intelligence work for the Syrian opposition.

Last weekend, the so-called Friends of Syria, which includes both Germany and Qatar, announced at its meeting in Istanbul that it would increase its support for the Syrian opposition. US secretary of state John Kerry announced plans to double its financial support for the opposition to US$250 million and supply body armour, night vision equipment and armoured vehicles to the rebels. Westerwelle, who until now has officially rejected any direct arming of the opposition, spoke at the fringes of the conference in favour of a possible relaxation of the European Union arms embargo against Syria.

While the federal government is pushing for war, the German media is beating the military drum. On Sunday, Die Welt demanded more arms for the pro-imperialist opposition: “The so-called Friends of Syria know their partners within the Syrian opposition. They should supply them in a responsible and controlled manner with everything they need for their struggle against Assad’s regime of terror. It is a fight to the death, one in which any compromises or peaceful political settlement no longer seems possible. For such it is far too late.”

After more than a decade of combat and the brutal occupation of Afghanistan, the German elite increasingly regards war once again as a legitimate and “normal” means of politics.

In an interview with the British Guardian, Defence Minister de Maizière said on Monday: “In Afghanistan, German soldiers had to fight for the first time because of necessity. Some of our partners thought we were ‘cake-eaters’, and not up to the task…. But the German armed forces proved to be able to fight. Germany had to learn that fighting is important.” He then quoted the Prussian general and military historian Carl von Clausewitz, who said, “War is the continuation of politics by other means.”

German President Gauck calls for aggressive foreign policy: here.

CIA Paid Millions In ‘Ghost Money’ To Afghan President’s Office, NYT Reports: here.

11 thoughts on “German militarism, Afghanistan and Qatar

  1. 7 American service members killed in Afghanistan

    By PATRICK QUINN and RAHIM FAIEZ

    — May. 4 5:04 PM EDT

    KABUL, Afghanistan (AP) — Seven U.S. soldiers and a member of the NATO-led coalition were killed on Saturday in one of the deadliest days for Americans and other foreign troops in Afghanistan in recent months, as the Taliban continued attacks as part of their spring offensive.

    The renewed violence came as Afghan President Hamid Karzai acknowledged at a news conference that regular payments his government has received from the CIA for more than a decade would continue. Karzai also said that talks on a U.S.-Afghan bilateral security agreement to govern future American military presence in the country had been delayed because of conditions the Afghans were placing on the deal.

    The U.S.-led coalition reported that five international troops were killed by a roadside bomb in southern Afghanistan, and coalition spokesman Capt. Luca Carniel confirmed that all five were American.

    The coalition did not disclose the location of the roadside bombing. However, Javeed Faisal, a spokesman for the governor of Kandahar province, said the coalition patrol hit the bomb in the Maiwand district of the province, the spiritual birthplace of the Taliban.

    Later, the coalition reported that a soldier with the Afghan National Army turned his weapon on coalition troops in the west, killing two in the most recent of so-called insider attacks. Such attacks by members of the Afghan security forces against their fellow colleagues or international troops have eroded confidence in the Afghan forces as they work to take over from foreign forces.

    Both killed were American, according to two U.S. officials who spoke on condition of anonymity to disclose the nationalities ahead of an official announcement.

    Another coalition service member was killed in an insurgent attack in northern Afghanistan, the NATO-led force said. It did not provide any further details of the incident.

    It was the fourth time since last summer that seven Americans have been killed on a single day in the war.

    On March 12, a Black Hawk helicopter crashed outside Kandahar, killing five U.S. troops. Two more U.S. troops were killed that day by an insider attack.

    And on April 6, Afghan militants killed six Americans, including a young female diplomat, and an Afghan doctor in a pair of attacks in southern Afghanistan. The three U.S. service members, two U.S. civilians and the doctor were killed when the group was struck by an explosion while traveling to donate books to a school. A seventh American, a civilian, was killed in a separate insurgent attack in the east.

    On Aug. 16, 2012, seven American service members were killed in two attacks in Kandahar province. Six were killed when their helicopter was shot down by insurgents and one soldier died in a roadside bomb explosion.

    At the news conference, Karzai said he had met earlier in the day with the Kabul station chief of the CIA and was reassured that the agency’s payments to the Afghan government would continue. The New York Times had reported that for more than a decade, the CIA had given the Afghan National Security Council tens of millions of dollars in monthly payments delivered in suitcases, backpacks and plastic shopping bags.

    Karzai said he told the station chief: “‘Because of all these rumors in the media, please do not cut all this money because we really need it. We want to continue this sort of assistance.’ And he promised that they are not going to cut this money.”

    Karzai described the payments as a form of “government-to-government” assistance, and while he wouldn’t say how much the CIA gave to the National Directorate of Security, which is the Afghan intelligence service, he said the financial help was very useful. He claimed that much of the money was used to care for wounded employees of the NDS, Afghanistan’s intelligence service, and operational expenses.

    “We have spent it in different areas (and) solved lots of our problems,” Karzai said.

    He said the CIA payments were made in cash and that “all the money which we have spent, receipts have been sent back to the intelligence service of the United States monthly.”

    The CIA declined to comment on Saturday.

    During the news conference at the presidential palace, Karzai also discussed ongoing negotiations on a U.S.-Afghan bilateral security agreement. He said talks had been delayed because of certain conditions that Afghanistan was insisting be included in the pact, which will govern a U.S. military presence after 2014 when nearly all foreign combat troops are to have finished their withdrawal from Afghanistan. The talks, which started in late 2012, are set to last up to a year.

    President Barack Obama has not said how many troops will remain, although there have been estimates ranging from 8,000 to 12,000. It is unlikely such an announcement will be made until the security agreement is signed. Those troops would help train Afghan forces and also carry out operations against al-Qaida and other militant groups.

    Karzai said Afghanistan was ready to sign a deal as long as the American government in exchange for being able to stay on bases in the country agrees to terms of Afghan security, funding assistance and help with training and equipping Afghan security forces. It is thought that the contentious issue of providing U.S. troops immunity from Afghan law is a low priority for the Afghan government in the negotiations.

    The Afghan government has not said how much rent it would want for three or four U.S. bases, but it is believed to be in the billions. Afghanistan is also thought to be seeking security guarantees to protect its porous borders, including the frontier with Pakistan that is the main infiltration route for insurgents who retain sanctuary in Pakistan’s lawless tribal areas.

    It was unclear how Karzai expected the United States or any of its allies to guarantee Afghanistan’s borders against attack.

    Like

  2. Pingback: Qatar princes get richer, workers die | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: No World Cup in dictatorial Qatar, Moroccan footballer says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Slave labour in Qatar | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Qatar dictatorship’s ‘free’ press | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Afghan civilian German war crime survivors not compensated | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: German militarism in the Middle East and Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: German militarism revival | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Afghan war crime survivors not compensated by German government | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: German army covers up neo-nazi scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Another German army officer arrested in neonazi teror scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply to petrel41 Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.