This video says about itself:
Authorities Censor Two Arab Spring-Inspired Art Pieces at Gallery
Two paintings inspired by the Arab Spring at an art fair in the UAE were taken by authorities, to the surprise of curators and collectors.
From Inside Higher Ed:
Scholar Detained, Meeting Aborted
February 25, 2013 – 3:00am
In 2011, the London School of Economics and Political Science was embarrassed by revelations of its ties to the government of the deposed Libyan dictator Muammar el-Qaddafi. A highly damning outside report accused senior leaders of the university of failing to protect academic values while seeking to raise money and build ties in the Middle East.
LSE (as the university is called) has continued to build ties in the Middle East. But on Friday, when one of its scholars was briefly detained and blocked from participating in a conference the university was co-sponsoring in the United Arab Emirates, LSE called off its participation in the conference, which had been slated to be held Sunday at the American University of Sharjah, the co-sponsor of the event. Without detailing events, LSE issued a statement Friday in which it said that it was calling off its participation in a meeting on “The New Middle East: Transition in the Arab World” because of “restrictions imposed on the intellectual content of the event that threatened academic freedom.” The American University of Sharjah confirmed that the event was called off and said only this about the reasons why: “The decision made by LSE cited restrictions on the intellectual content of the event that threatened academic freedom as the reason for the cancelation. AUS is unaware of any other information relating to the last minute cancellation.”
The embassy of the UAE in Washington did not respond to a request from Inside Higher Ed for comment.
The apparent cause of the conference’s collapse was a move by authorities to detain Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, who teaches government and does research on the Middle East, when he arrived in Dubai for the conference. He was barred from entering the country and was sent back to Britain.
Via e-mail with Inside Higher Ed, Ulrichsen described what happened: “At the immigration desk, my passport obviously triggered a red flag…. I was taken to a backroom passport office where my passport was scrutinized page by page. After 15 minutes an official came and took the passport away for about an hour. During this time, there were between three-five officials and security personnel in the office but they ignored me and didn’t stop me from using my smart-phone to publicize my predicament on Twitter or make phone calls.
“Finally, an official returned with a representative from Emirates and told me that I was not allowed to enter the UAE and would be sent back to London. I had to purchase my own ticket back and the official kept my passport and new boarding pass until I departed. Before picking them up, I had to answer several questions from a security officer about why I was in the UAE, for what reason, with whom I was meeting, etc.” Asked why officials might not have wanted him in the country, Ulrichsen said that his “writing over the past two years has consistently been critical of the Gulf States’ reactions to the Arab Spring.” He has written numerous pieces about political prisoners in the country, and summarized concerns about civil liberties and political freedom in a piece for Open Democracy called “UAE: Holding Back the Tide.” Ulrichsen added that “as someone who has visited and traveled widely within the UAE and seen at first hand the wide inequalities and discrepancies of wealth between Abu Dhabi/Dubai and the much poorer Northern Emirates, I clearly was a knowledgeable voice that was very threatening to the regime.”
Ulrichsen has also written critically about the government of Bahrain and its response to protests there, and that was to have been the subject of his talk at the conference — but he said he believes this topic was declared off-limits. Ulrichsen praised LSE for refusing to go along with the conference, and said he thought it reflected the promises LSE made after the Libya controversy to keep academic values central when working in other countries.
“LSE did absolutely the right thing,” Ulrichsen said. “By leaving the decision to intervene in the academic content of the conference to remove my paper on Bahrain until the last minute, the UAE authorities may have hoped that the LSE would acquiesce in a fait accompli and carry on regardless. By calling their bluff, the LSE acted on a principled stance; it is difficult to see how any other decision could have been made in light of the new ethics codes that were put in place by the Woolf Inquiry [the outside report] as one of the ‘lessons learned’ from the LSE-Libya affair in 2011.”
The incident this weekend has prompted much chatter on Twitter praising Ulrichsen and LSE and raising questions about Western universities and their activities in parts of the world without traditions of full freedom of expression.Jon Western, a professor of international relations at Mount Holyoke College, wrote on the blog The Duck of Minerva that the situation with this conference relates to “the broader challenges facing academic institutions that are trying to expand their presence around the globe. There is a lot of pressure by college and university administrators to expand and open academic operations (including academic conferences, study abroad and cultural exchanges, direct programs, and new satellite campuses) in countries that are really rich with historically less access to higher education and where the norms of academic freedom vary substantially. And, while there may be occasional examples of restrictions on academic freedom that are this explicit, my sense is that there are far more academic programs and operations indirectly influenced by more restrictive norms on academic freedom in host countries.”
Trial of political activists underway in United Arab Emirates: here.
UAE clamps down on Facebook, issues ‘do’s and don’ts’ for the country’s users: here.
- Gulf conference abruptly cancelled (bbc.co.uk)
- UAE confirms Ulrichsen was prevented entry to UAE (gulfnews.com)
- Arab Spring forum in UAE cancelled (arabtimesonline.com)
- UAE bars British scholar over his views on Bahrain (journalstar.com)
- UAE bars British scholar over his views on Bahrain (miamiherald.com)
- LSE Middle East conference abruptly cancelled (educationviews.org)
- UAE blocks academic from Arab Spring meet (thehindu.com)
Dubai Officials Block Bahrain-Based AP Journalist
DUBAI, United Arab Emirates February 25, 2013 (AP)
A Bahrain-based journalist for The Associated Press has been blocked from entry into the United Arab Emirates under apparent new restrictions by Gulf Arab states.
Reem Khalifa and her husband, Mansoor al-Jamri, chief editor for Bahrain’s independent Al Wasat newspaper, were told Monday at Dubai International Airport that they were [on] a list to deny entry. No further explanations were immediately given, but it appears part of tighter coordination between Gulf allies to control and monitor journalists, activists and others in the region.
Khalifa and her husband, on a private visit to Dubai, closely cover Bahrain’s 2-year-old uprising between majority Shiites and the kingdom’s Sunni rulers, who are closely backed by other Gulf leaders.
A senior UAE official said airport immigration issues fall under Dubai police, which had no immediate comment.
UAE man jailed 10 months for tweeting on father’s trial
Reuters – 2 hrs 42 mins ago
DUBAI (Reuters) – A court in the United Arab Emirates sentenced a man to 10 months in jail on Monday after he tweeted details of the trial of his father and 93 other people accused of plotting to seize power in the Gulf Arab state, an Emirati activist said.
Human Rights Watch (HRW) said last week that Abdulla al-Hadidi was arrested on March 21 on charges of publishing “in bad faith” false details of a public trial session on the Internet.
The day before the arrest, officials from the Federal Supreme Court in Abu Dhabi had informed Hadidi and several other relatives of the defendants family members would no longer be allowed to attend the trial, HRW said.
Rights groups urged UAE authorities to grant full public access to the trial. A source close to the UAE government has said the trial was taking place in a “very transparent manner”.
UAE newspapers have said the defendants belong to al-Islah, a local Islamist group which says it wants peaceful reform.
Emirati activist Ahmed Mansoor said the Abu Dhabi court found Hadidi guilty of publishing on Twitter “with bad intent” what happened at the hearing. But the court acquitted him of using force and violence with public officials during the trial.
Mansoor, who said he had spoken to one of the lawyers involved in the case, told Reuters Hadidi’s attorney would appeal the sentence.
A source close to the UAE government said it “is not our practice to comment on court deliberations and rulings”.
The state news agency WAM in January quoted the attorney general, Salem Saeed Kubaish, as saying that members of the group had sought to penetrate institutions of the state, including schools, universities and ministries.
The defendants are accused of “belonging to an illegal, secret organization … that aims to counter the foundations of this state in order to seize power and of contacting foreign entities and groups to implement this plan,” WAM said.
(Writing by Yara Bayoumy; Editing by Sami Aboudi and Robin Pomeroy)
Pingback: Bahraini human rights activist speaks | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government welcomes dictatorships at London arms fair | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Palaces for Bahrain royals, no homes for their subjects | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi absolute monarchy threatened by pro-democracy movement | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Typhoon warplanes to Bahraini dictatorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British government helps corrupt BAE selling weapons to dictators | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Stop oil sheiks’ killing of Pakistani MacQueen’s bustards | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Jail for tweeting in Turkey, Bahrain, etc. | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British student tortured, jailed in United Arab Emirates | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Tony Blair’s financial links to Gulf oil monarchies criticized | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain absolute monarchy transphobia arrest | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saudi government help for Isis extremists in Iraq | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Sandhurst, British academy for Arabian princely military dictators | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Tony Blair, buddy of Kazakhstan dictator | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Re-starting Iraq war helps ISIS terrorism | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Anti-humanitarian Bahrain government, ally in ‘humanitarian’ war | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahraini torture prince investigated by British police? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Qatar dictatorship gets more British weapons | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Civilians killed in Pentagon’s re-started Iraq war | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: UAE museum construction workers exploited and oppressed | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Washington summit ‘against extremism’, with ‘extremist’ regimes | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Hillary Clinton’s money from dictatorships | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Tony Blair’s Emirates dictatorship money | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Conservative-Dubai dictatorship alliance | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: ISIS and absolute monarchies in the Middle East | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: UAE people spied upon by government, foreign corporations | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: No training in dictatorial Dubai, fans persuade football clubs | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Conservatives soft on UAE human rights violations | Dear Kitty. Some blog