Governments ignore science on fishing

This video is called Overfishing – The consequences.

From Wildlife Extra:

Bankrupting our oceans: Fisheries Ministers ignore 87% scientific advice

Fishing quotas on average 45% higher than scientists advise.

December 2102. An analysis by WWF shows that over the past nine years fisheries ministers have only followed scientific advice in 13 per cent of their decisions; and set fishing quotas on average 45 per cent higher than the recommended scientific advice. This means that ministers have approved fishing of 6.2 million extra tons of fish, in addition to the scientifically proposed catch levels – this is legalised overfishing.

WWF’s analysis, developed ahead of the PECH committee (the specialist committee on fisheries in the European Parliament) vote taking place on the 18th of December as part of the EU fisheries reform process currently in progress, paints a worrying picture of legalised overfishing by EU governments.

Fisheries ministers doing a bad job

“The European Parliament needs to see what a bad job fisheries ministers have been doing over the past decade. One extraordinary example of this is a deviation of 264 per cent above scientific advice for sole in 2008! MEPs now have a unique opportunity and the power to right a wrong and the answer is simple – listen to science and let fish stocks recover”, says Tony Long, Director of WWF’s European Policy Office.

Quotas don’t include discards

To add to the problem of not following scientific advice, the setting of quotas does not include the quantity of fish that is thrown overboard and wasted and not registered as catch. For example between 2003 and 2005, fishing of North Sea cod alone resulted in 18,000 tons of fish being discarded, equivalent to filling around 1,300 average sized rubbish trucks.

80% Mediterranean fish stocks are overfished

In Europe almost half the stocks in the northeast Atlantic are overfished and in the Mediterranean this figure is as high as 80 per cent. EU fishing fleets have been plundering European waters for too long, resulting in two-thirds of assessed fish stocks being overfished in total. Continuing this way will prove devastating not only to Europe’s fish stocks but also to the fishing industry in the long-term, where we will see a decline in profits and income for fishermen, unless the upcoming EU fisheries reform ensures that fish stocks are recovered and managed at sustainable levels.

€7.5 million spent on ignored advice

“To add insult to injury, by disregarding scientific advice, fisheries ministers are effectively not only making decisions that are depleting a ‘public good’ such as fish, but they are also wasting fish through discarding and wasting EU citizens’ money. Between 2003 and 2012, the European Union paid around €7.5 million to ICES for a scientific service which the fisheries ministers are simply not taking into account when making their decisions. Something has got to change,” continues Mr Long.

Positive trends in fish stocks recovering have been seen in recent years, however all too often they are an exception rather than a rule. The current situation needs to be reversed and legal overfishing needs to be stopped – fish stocks will only be able to recover when the right political decisions are made which follow scientific advice.

5 thoughts on “Governments ignore science on fishing

  1. Pingback: Governments ignore science on fishing « Philip's Blog

  2. Pingback: Britain to oppose new EU controls on cod catches | Environment | The Observer | oceanNRG

  3. Pingback: Artists helping fish | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Overfishing making fish smaller | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Galapagos conservation news | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.