This video is called Tringa totanus – Common Redshank.
From Wildlife Extra:
Light pollution not all bad for wildlife – Helps some waders feed at night
Ecologists shed new light on effects of light pollution on wildlife
November 2012. Light pollution is often associated with negative effects on wildlife. Now, ecologists have found that by mimicking a perpetual full moon, the gas flares and electrical lighting along Scotland‘s Forth estuary are helping shorebirds stock up on more food during the winter to fuel their spring migration. The research is the first to use night-time light data from US military satellites to study animal behaviour.
Coasts and estuaries are most heavily developed
Coasts and estuaries are among the most rapidly developing areas on Earth. Night-time satellite images of the planet show that except Antarctica, continents are ringed with halos of brightly-lit human development. But coasts are also key wildlife sites. Every year, millions of waterbirds arrive from the Arctic to overwinter on UK coasts, yet scientists remain largely in the dark about how these birds respond to the bright lights of coastal cities and industry.
To shed light on the issue, Dr Ross Dwyer and colleagues from the University of Exeter investigated how artificial light affected feeding habits of the common redshank in the Forth estuary, one of Scotland’s most industrialised coasts. As well as major industry such as Grangemouth oil refinery and Longannet power station, whose lights and gas flares illuminate the intertidal areas at night, the estuary’s pristine salt marsh and mudflats are home to hundreds of thousands of migrating birds each winter.
Dr Dwyer measured the amount of artificial light in the Forth estuary at night using satellite images from the US Air Force. Although they have been previously used to study electrical power consumption, this is the first time such US military data has been used in animal behaviour research.
Redshanks with radio transmitters
He then worked out how the light affected the birds’ foraging behaviour by attaching tiny radio transmitters to the backs of 20 redshanks. The devices monitored the birds’ location and contained posture sensors to detect how often the birds put their heads down to feed.
Generally, redshanks need to forage day and night during the winter to find enough food. These birds usually forage by sight during the day, which provides them with the most food, and less efficiently at night by locating prey by touch using their bills.
The study found that artificial light had a major impact on how redshanks searched for food, allowing them to forage more efficiently. At night, birds in brightly-lit areas foraged for longer and foraged by sight, rather than touch, compared with birds under darker night skies.
According to Dr Dwyer: “Artificial light from industrial areas strongly influenced the foraging strategy of our tagged birds. It was as if the 24-hour light emitted from lamps and flares on the Grangemouth oil refinery site created, in effect, a perpetual full moon across the local inter-tidal area which the birds seemed to capitalise on by foraging for longer periods at night and switching to a potentially more effective foraging behaviour to locate prey.”
Light pollution – Negative affects
The results contrast with other studies, which have found adverse effects of light pollution on wildlife. Previous research found artificial light caused newly-hatched turtles to head away from the sea, rather than towards it, and caused seabirds such as petrels to collide with lighthouses and other lit structures.
Named for their long bright orange or red legs, the common redshank is a medium-sized shorebird with a greyish brown back and wings in winter, and a black-tipped orange bill. On their wintering sites, the birds patrol estuaries and coastal lagoons feeding on molluscs, worms and crustaceans. Redshanks are generally very wary and nervous birds. Often the first to panic, they give noisy ‘teu-hoo’ alarm calls, earning them the nickname ‘sentinel of the marshes’.
Redshanks are widely distributed, breeding and wintering across temperate Europe and Asia. Although numbers are in decline, the species is widespread and quite plentiful in some regions, and thus not considered a threatened species by the IUCN.
The research was published in the British Ecological Society’s Journal of Animal Ecology.
How Lights Threaten Birds: here.
- Light pollution can have positive effects on wildlife, study shows (guardian.co.uk)
- Light pollution ‘helps wildlife’ (independent.ie)
- Light Pollution May Actually Help Some Migratory Birds (treehugger.com)
- Industrial lights help birds feed (bbc.co.uk)
- At Least One Bird Is Pretty Happy About the Local Oil Refinery (motherboard.vice.com)
- Clamorous reed warblers in Bahrain (dearkitty1.wordpress.com)
I’m relieved that some of our activities are not all bad….thanks Kitty, SN
I wonder whether there would be similar results for non-redshank waders.
Yes, it would be a very interesting and worthwhile study. SN.
Indeed. It might be a problem that radio transmitters might be too big for birds smaller than redshanks, like sanderlings.
Definitely, it would be a problem with smaller birds. The study would be unacceptable if it interfered with their natural behaviour or caused them any discomfort whatsoever. SN
True. The problem might be solved with making still smaller transmitters for small birds. Meanwhile, eg curlews might be studied.
Yes the beautiful Curlew. As a youth I walked the hills in the Forest of Bowland (which is not actually a forest) and could imitate their call. Happy memories, wonderful bird.
Here is a curlew blog post:
Thanks Kitty, that’s very thoughtful of you. SN 🙂
Pingback: Light pollution hurts turtles, helps redshanks « Philip's Blog
Pingback: Star Photography – How to Take Photos of the Stars | News
Pingback: White redshank in Wales | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Aldebaran and oystercatcher against light pollution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Coastal bird count, from Europe to South Africa | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Helping grounded seabirds in Peru | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Red light does not harm bats | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: More Dutch birds information on the Internet | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: White redshank in Wales | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Berlin bats and light pollution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Brown shrike in Belgium, first ever | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Saving insects from light pollution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Florida, USA green turtles’ health research | Dear Kitty. Some blog