Nineteenth-century British medicine and graverobbing


This video from England is called Doctors, Dissection and Resurrection Men teaser trailer.

From Socialist Worker weekly in Britain:

Tue 27 Nov 2012

The skeletons in the closet of Victorian medical science

An exhibition at the Museum of London unearths the looted graves on which modern surgery was built, writes Dave Sewell

When archaelogists dug around the grounds of the Royal London Hospital in Whitechapel in 2006, they discovered a long forgotten cemetery.

Many of the bones had been sliced, drilled and dissected. Others had been rejoined with metal wire or stained by wax.

This is where the Museum of London’s new exhibition on “Doctors, Dissection and Resurrection Men” begins. It tells of the grisly trade in stolen corpses that allowed modern medicine to develop.

As well as unearthed remains it includes dissecting tables, diaries, pamphlets—and some exquisite wax anatomical models.

In 19th century London the demand for skilled surgeons exploded. Migrant workers poured into the booming docks and industries. Their bosses took out hospital subscriptions because of the appalling level of work accidents.

Before anaesthetic or antiseptic, every­thing depended on the surgeons’ skill, speed and precision. And the only real training could come from cutting up corpses known as cadavers.

But since the 1751 Murder Act, only those hanged for murder could be legally dissected. The dishonour and humiliation of dissection was intended as an extra punishment.

So almost every respectable surgeon made up the difference by cutting deals with a feared and hated underground trade in graverobbing.

In 1827 terrified patients at the Royal London raised the alarm as hospital graves next to their ward were robbed.

Five years earlier William Millard was caught in the act there. He died in prison while his wife Ann campaigned tirelessly to expose the hospital authorities. They had used him for years to supply bodies—only to let him take all the blame.

Coffins

Paupers’ mass graves made easy pickings, while unearthed coffins of richer people show metal spikes and bars designed to keep the body snatchers out.

The freshest corpses were the most prized—and some graverobbers turned to murder. John Bishop and Thomas Williams were executed for killing a boy for dissection in 1821.

Vengeful crowds nearly broke down the doors to watch as they themselves were dissected. Pieces of their skin preserved for grisly souvenirs are shown here, while a gripping video installation tells their sordid tale.

By 1832 the panic over the “Resurrection Men” gave surgeons a means to push for a change in the legislation.

The Anatomy Act of 1832 authorised the dissection of any corpse unclaimed within two days of death—a fate often hard to avoid for migrant labourers whose relatives could be hundreds of miles away.

The establishment of workhouses in 1834 created a further supply of bodies. Dissection was still considered a dreaded punishment—but now for poverty rather than murder.

In the hundred years following the Anatomy Act, over 99 percent of corpses came from workhouses, hospitals and asylums. The act was finally repealed in 1984.

At the heart of this gripping exhibition lies a tragic contradiction. Dissection of the dead was a weapon to terrify the living poor. Yet it was the poor themselves who had the most to lose from untrained surgeons.

So vital advances in medical sciences were inseparable from a medical establishment preying on the very people they were meant to heal.

Doctors, Dissection and Resurrection Men runs until 14 April at the Museum of London, 150 London Wall, EC2Y 5HN. £9 admission. Go to www.museumoflondon.org.uk.

‘THE BODY TRADE’ “When Americans leave their bodies to science, they are also donating to commerce: Cadavers and body parts, especially those of the poor, are sold in a thriving and largely unregulated market.” [Reuters]

7 thoughts on “Nineteenth-century British medicine and graverobbing

  1. Certainly a conundrum however, without it man would not have progressed as he did. This does not excuse the moral debauchery created by some, though it does gives a sense of rationalisation for the extremes practiced.
    I enjoyed the video; very eye opening…!

    Like

    • Thanks for your comment, Carolyn! What should have happened, instead of graverobbing, is pointing out to people the possibility of putting their body at the disposal of science voluntarily after dying. However, there were strong religious prejudices against that.

      Like

  2. Pingback: Nineteenth-century British medicine and graverobbing | Mental Health, Politics and LGBT issues | Scoop.it

  3. Pingback: Liebster Award, thanks Morrighan! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: English poem on unemployment | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Liebster Award, thanks Morrighan! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: British junior doctors keep fighting | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.