United States religious Right pseudo-science


This video from the USA is called Sarah Palin Thinks Humans & Dinosaurs Co-Existed.

From the National Memo in the USA:

Weird Science: Six ‘Scientific’ Theories That Right-Wingers Insist Are True

August 24th, 2012 11:08 pm

Jason Sattler

Mike Huckabee isn’t the only conservative now defending Todd Akin (R-MO) — who is still running to replace Claire McCaskill (D-MO) in the U.S. Senate. Huckabee and other religious right leaders within the GOP insist that Akin is right — although many of the party’s leading figures — including the party’s presidential nominee Mitt Romney and Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus — asked Akin to withdraw after the congressman said that victims of “legitimate rape” can’t get pregnant.

Conservapedia – the right-wing alternative to Wikipedia – not only supports Akin, but has published a footnoted reference that defends Akin’s scientific prognosis about “legitimate rape” victims — something that only Rep. Steve King (R-IA), of all elected Republicans, has attempted to do so far. “In the experience of most sexual assault centers, the chance of pregnancy occurring is quite low,” says Conservapedia, quoting from “the classic text book by Lentz.” It’s a text that American women impregnated by rape — estimated between 25,000 and 32,000 victims annually — would surely dispute.

Rewriting science to fit a political agenda is a constant complaint conservatives voice about liberals. Yet the left believes in the academic discipline of rigorous peer review. The right continually relies on literal interpretations of the Bible and pseudo-science, which is the only way you’d ever buy any of the following theories.

Dinosaurs existed at the same time as humans, and still exist

You may know that in the state of Louisiana students are being taught that the Loch Ness Monster is real. The belief that dinosaurs existed at the same time as mankind — and still may exist today — is crucial to “New Earth Creationism,” which posits that the earth – as the Bible says – is only six thousand years old. How else would you explain these recent dinosaur sightings in Papua New Guinea?

8 thoughts on “United States religious Right pseudo-science

  1. Now post some of the good things about conservatives. Remember; there are fiscal conservatives who don’t care for social conservatives. There are conservatives who are both social and fiscal. But liberals tend to be both socially and fiscally liberal. Thanks for thinking about it.

    Like

    • You mention a very big complex of issues.

      It is even more complex than you mention. Eg, just in the USA, there are also paleoconservatives versus neoconservatives.

      And in the USA, “conservative” may not mean the same thing as in Canada (at least, not historically), or in Britain, or in Latin America. “Liberal” also does not mean the same in the USA as in European countries or Australia.

      In the archives of my blog, you will find quotes from some “good” things written in conservative media. Eg, British Conservative papers about Tony Blair. A British Conservative and monarchist daily’s criticisms of the royal family:

      British royals’ connection to Bahrain tyranny

      Like

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.