Facebook stock market scandal

This video from the USA is called Facebook vs. Google: Who Got IPO Shares?

By Barry Grey in the USA:

Facebook IPO engulfed by insider trading scandal

24 May 2012

Multiple investigations and lawsuits have been announced following reports of deceptive practices and insider trading in connection with last Friday’s $16 billion initial public offering of Facebook stock.

On Tuesday, Reuters reported that the social networking company and its bank underwriters downgraded their forecasts for the company’s earnings shortly before they increased the number of shares and raised the offering price in advance of the IPO. Neither Facebook nor the banks publicly announced their downgrades. The major banks involved are Morgan Stanley, JPMorgan Chase, Goldman Sachs and Bank of America.

Morgan Stanley, the lead underwriter of the IPO, is specifically accused of informing institutional investors and favored clients of its downgrade of Facebook and not telling the investing public at large.

These revelations suggest that insider trading and deception played a role in heavy selling of Facebook stock that drove down the price to barely more than the $38 initial offering price at the close of trading Friday, and has since cut the stock to $32, down 16 percent from the offering price. While Facebook executives, early investors in the company and Wall Street insiders, including at least some of the underwriting banks, made a fortune selling shares, many thousands of small investors have suffered heavy losses in the biggest ever Internet IPO.

The stench of fraud is compounded by the frenzied media hype in the run-up to the IPO, which was instrumental in inveigling small investors into what appears to have been a trap laid by Facebook and the banks.

On Tuesday, Mary Schapiro, chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, said her agency would look into charges surrounding the Facebook public offering, and both the Senate Banking and House Financial Services committees said they would begin to investigate the deal.

William Galvin, the secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on Tuesday subpoenaed Morgan Stanley’s internal documents on the IPO. In addition, an official at the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Wall Street’s own regulatory body, said the group would examine the private advisories by bank underwriters to big investors.

Facebook shareholders meanwhile filed suit in federal district court in New York against Facebook, Morgan Stanley and other bank underwriters charging that the defendants fraudulently concealed the company’s weakened growth forecasts. A similar suit was filed in California.

Another suit was filed by investors against Nasdaq, which lists Facebook shares. The exchange was swamped last Friday by record trading volume in the new public stock and experienced delays and failures to confirm investors’ trades.

On May 9, nine days before the IPO, Facebook filed an updated IPO prospectus with the Securities and Exchange Commission in which it said its revenue and earnings prospects were threatened by a disconnect between the growth of its user base and ads volume. Its users were growing much faster than its ads business, a problem the company attributed to the rapid growth of its mobile user base.

Facebook officials personally called stock analysts at its major IPO underwriters to advise them of these negative trends. Just days before the IPO, analysts at Morgan Stanley, Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and Bank of America lowered their forecast numbers for Facebook as a result. The banks then relayed the weaker forecasts to selected clients, one of whom reportedly was warned that second-quarter revenue could be 5 percent lower than earlier estimates.

At virtually the same time they were downgrading their business forecasts, Facebook and the underwriters decided to raise the price range of the initial stock offering from a high of $35 to a high of $38 and increase the number of shares being offered by 25 percent.

The Financial Times on Wednesday quoted Hugh Evans of T. Rowe Price, a big institutional shareholder of Facebook, as saying, “They raised the range on the offering literally two days after the underwriters called around saying, ‘lower your numbers for the second quarter.’ Those two things don’t go together, ever.”

These facts may explain why Facebook executives, long-time shareholders and underwriting banks decided on the eve of the IPO to increase the shares they planned to sell. The Wall Street Journal reported May 17 that Goldman Sachs, Tiger Global Management and Facebook director Peter Thiel, one of Facebook’s first investors, had more than doubled the volume of shares they planned to sell.

Pat Garofalo and Travis Waldron, ThinkProgress: “Facebook’s initial public offering – which so dominated the financial press that Facebook has been on the cover of the Wall Street Journal for nine straight days – has started to raise some red flags for regulators, after it came to light the company and its Wall Street underwriters quietly hid a report about weak revenue. And that’s just one of several ways in which the Facebook IPO highlights how Wall Street and big companies can game the rules to gain an economic advantage”: here.

Mark Zuckerberg Net Worth No Longer On Bloomberg Billionaire’s List After Facebook Share Slide: here.

11 thoughts on “Facebook stock market scandal

  1. Pingback: Anti-fascist trade unionist gets applause | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: United States corporate Internet censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Price of Facebook shares plunges

    BUSINESS: Shares in US social network Facebook sunk to new lows today after a ban on investors ditching the stock was lifted.

    They fell by 6 per cent to below £12.70 after after investors who bought into the company before it went public were allowed to sell up to 271 million shares as a “lock-up” period expired.

    Facebook has now seen £31.2 billion wiped from its value since its £66.2bn flotation in May.



  4. Pingback: Extinct graptolites’ modern relatives | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Internet freedom activist Aaron Swartz, funeral report | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Facebook blokkeert NOS-redacteuren

    Update: dinsdag 26 feb 2013, 12:17

    Redacteuren van NOSop3 zijn voor 24 uur geblokkeerd op Facebook. Aanleiding is een artikel over een gastdocent aan de Wageningen Universiteit, die na een college werd betrapt terwijl hij porno keek. Het verhaal werd gisteren met foto op Facebook geplaatst.

    Eerder werd NOSop3 berispt na een verwijzing naar een filmpje met naakte mensen erin over GroenLinks.

    Volgens FB is de Verklaring van rechten en verantwoordelijkheden van Facebook geschonden. De NOS vindt het logisch dat FB grenzen trekt, maar minder logisch dat een journalistieke organisatie op deze manier wordt afgestraft.



  7. Pingback: JP Morgan bank Chinese corruption scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: JP Morgan bank Chinese corruption scandal | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Facebook and privacy | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Economic crisis, but not for the rich | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.