This 6 August 2012 video says about itself:
Elephant killers Trump, King Juan Carlos of Spain
The Spanish branch of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) says it stripped the King of his position because his participation in the hunting safari was incompatible with the group’s goal of conserving endangered species.
Killers of elephants like the Trumps make the future of the elephants so urgent? …
Trump sleeping with foreign girls and hating elephants and foreign looking people.
Spain should take away the king’s crown…..What an example …
The sad part is that the Spanish people paid for this safari while NBC employs the Trumps using that money to kill elephants..
What will happen if the elephants invade the Trump Towers…
There was general outrage when King Juan Carlos of Spain, though honorary president of the World Wildlife Fund, went to Botswana for an expensive hunting trip. His Majesty then killed an African elephant.
Because of the outrage, the king has apologized, saying he would not do this again.
Some people may have considered the king’s behaviour uncivilised, “caveman-like”. However, then they did not know yet about new research, showing that about 100,000 years ago, humans from what is now Spain already killed elephants (or maybe, as we will see, they were scavengers of already dead elephants). Not in Botswana; in Spain itself.
Though the article quoted below does not say so, very probably those Spanish elephant hunters (or scavengers) were not the present human species Homo sapiens, but Neanderthal people.
This video, in Spanish, is called Ciencia neandertal 1. Neanderthal art r/evolution. La piedra Rosetta de la prehistoria.
It is about Neanderthal artistic representations of, eg, elephants.
From Spero News:
Spaniards once ate elephant meat
Tuesday, April 24, 2012
Humans that populated the banks of the river Manzanares (Madrid, Spain) during the Middle Palaeolithic (between 127,000 and 40,000 years ago) fed themselves on pachyderm meat and bone marrow.
Though these Middle Palaeolithic elephant eaters living in caves in what later became Madrid, have some things in common with the 21st century king living in a palace in Madrid, there are some big differences as well.
The Neanderthal people did not make 30,000 euro journeys to Botswana. They moved on foot around Madrid, which did not cost anyone anything.
And, in the Middle Palaeolithic, there was no agriculture yet, and in the Ice Age cold climate there were just few, tundra type, plants to eat. So, then eating animals like elephants was a matter of survival (as it was in England some 400,000 years ago). It is not any more today; certainly not for the king of Spain.
This is what a Spanish study shows and [it] has found percussion and cut marks on elephant remains in the site of Preresa (Madrid).
In prehistoric times, hunting animals implied a risk
a risk far bigger than today on royal safaris in Botswana
and required a considerable amount of energy. Therefore, when the people of the Middle Palaeolithic (between 127,000 and 40,000 years ago) had an elephant in the larder, they did not leave a scrap.
Another difference with the 2012 royal hunt.
Humans that populated the Madrid region 84,000 years ago fed themselves on these prosbocideans‘ meat and they consumed their bone marrow, according to this new study. Until now, the scientific community doubted that consuming elephant meat was a common practice in that era due to the lack of direct evidence on the bones. It is still to be determined whether they are from the Mammuthus species of the Palaleoloxodon subspecies.
It is not Palaleoloxodon, but Palaeoloxodon. Palaeoloxodon is not a subspecies, but a subgenus of the genus Elephas; of which today only one species survives, the Asian elephant Elephas maximus.
The researchers found bones with cut marks, made for consuming the meat, and percussion for obtaining the bone marrow. “There are many sites, but few with fossil remains with marks that demonstrate humans’ purpose” Jose Yravedra, researcher at the Complutense University of Madrid (UCM) and lead author of the study published in the Journal of Archaeological Science points out to SINC.
This is the first time that percussion marks that showed an intentional bone fracture to get to the edible part inside have been documented. These had always been associated with tool manufacturing but in the remains found, this hypothesis was discarded. The tools found in the same area were made of flint and quartzite.
The team, made up of archaeologists, zooarchaeologists and geologists from UCM, the Institute of Human Evolution in Africa (IDEA) in Madrid and the Spanish National Research Centre for Human Evolution (CENIEH) in Burgos, collected 82 bones from one elephant, linked to 754 stone tools, in an area of 255 metres squared, in the site of Preresa, on the banks of the river Manzanares.
In the case of the cut marks on the fossil remains, these add to the “oldest evidence of exploiting elephants” in the site of –idos
, close to the river Jarama, according to another study published by Yravedra in the same journal. “There are few records about the exploitation of elephants in Siberia, North America and central Europe”, the zooarchaeologist explains.
The risk of hunting an elephant
The internal organs were what the predator ate first, be they human or any kind of carnivore. The prehistoric signs of the banquet help researchers to find out who was the first to sit down at the table, as the risk of hunting an elephant posed the question as to whether humans hunted it or were scavengers.
“This is the next mystery to be solved” Yravedra replies, who reminds us that there is evidence of hunting in other smaller animals in the same site. However, due to the thickness of fibrous membranes and other elephant meat tissues, humans did not always leave marks on the bones. “And for this reason, sometimes it is difficult to determine if humans used their meat”.
The ‘Holy Grail’ of Palaeolithic diet
Animal fat was highly valued by hunters and gatherers that had a diet rich in meat and low in carbohydrates. When there was little meat, other resources such as bone marrow became a source of lipids.
According to the study, this practice was not very common due to the difficulty of extracting the marrow from the bones. Furthermore “exploiting the fat is something that has not been reported until now” the researcher says. Other food sources, such as brains, had the same nutritional benefits.
The smallest mammoth ever known to have existed roamed the island of Crete millions of years ago, researchers say: here.
Could Neanderthals have painted? Here.
Pingback: Spanish king unwelcome, town says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Oldest European Neolithic bow discovery | Dear Kitty. Some blog