From daily The Guardian in Britain:
Bahrain ‘torture service’ official to attend royal wedding
Ambassador to UK was previously in charge of Bahraini agency that is accused of electric shocks and beatings
Thursday 28 April 2011 17.49 BST
The former head of an agency accused of torture and human rights abuses is expected to be a guest at Friday’s royal wedding, the Guardian has learned.
Sheikh Khalifa Bin Ali al-Khalifa is a former head of Bahrain‘s National Security Agency (NSA) and will attend the wedding in his role as the current Bahraini ambassador to London.
British sources confirmed he had been invited and a spokesperson for the Bahraini embassy in London said he was expected to attend.
Khalifa was head of the agency from 2005 to 2008. The pressure group Human Rights Watch alleges that in 2007 detainees in Bahrain suffered torture including electric shocks and beatings.
On Thursday an invitation to attend the wedding was withdrawn from the Syrian ambassador to London because of concerns over domestic repression and human rights abuses. Libya is also excluded.
Bahrain has in recent months been wracked by protests and its government has been accused of unleashing a violent crackdown on dissent.
The concerns led to Bahrain’s crown prince declining to attend the wedding after originally being invited. However an invitation remains open to Khalifa, who became Bahrain’s ambassador to London in 2008.
According to the ambassador’s biography on the embassy’s website, he was head of the NSA from 2005 to 2008 before taking up the London posting.
A spokesperson for the Bahraini embassy in London confirmed the ambassador had been invited to the wedding and said: “I’m expecting he’s going to participate.”
A spokesperson for St James’s Palace said: “All heads of mission in London from countries with whom the United Kingdom is in normal diplomatic relations have been invited to the wedding. We acted in consultation with the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.”
A Human Rights Watch report on torture in Bahrain found: “Since the end of 2007 officials again have used torture and ill-treatment, particularly during the interrogation of security suspects. Human Rights Watch’s conclusion is based on interviews with former detainees and others, as well as its review of government documents.
“Security officials appear to have utilised a specific repertoire of techniques against many of those arrested designed to inflict pain and elicit confessions. These techniques included the use of electro-shock devices, suspension in painful positions, beating the soles of the feet (falaka) and beatings of the head, torso, and limbs.
“Some detainees also reported that security officials had threatened to kill them or to rape them or members of their families.”
The report implicates Bahrain’s NSA: “Most of the former detainees who spoke with Human Rights Watch said that they had been subjected to torture and ill-treatment at the headquarters of the ministry of interior’s general directorate of criminal investigation (CID) … and/or at the offices of the NSA, also on the grounds of the ministry of interior.”
The report tells of a group of men who claimed to have suffered torture at the hands of the NSA. “Seventeen of the men also identified one or more of the officers from the CID or NSA who they claimed participated in their torture.”
The decision to rescind the royal wedding invitation to Dr Sami Khiyami, the Syrian ambassador, was made after the foreign secretary, William Hague, decided it would be “unacceptable” for a representative of the Syrian government to attend in the light of the killing of hundreds of pro-democracy demonstrators.
Sami Khiyami, the Syrian ambassador, as far as I know, was banned from the wedding of Prince William and Kate Middleton for representing a dictatorial regime. Not because of personal involvement in crimes against humanity.
While, on the other hand, Sheikh Khalifa Bin Ali al-Khalifa, the Bahrani ambassador, is not just representing a dictatorial regime, but has personally blood on his hands as well.
So, if the British royals and the British government have any honesty, they will disinvite Sheikh Khalifa Bin Ali al-Khalifa, the Bahrani ambassador (and the other dictatorship represesentatives which they have invited), to the royal wedding. Don’t expect too much from them, however.
Royal Wedding will generate 12 times as much greenhouse gas than Buckingham Palace in a whole year: here.
Five Reasons to Hate the Royal Wedding: here.
A royal wedding is a sure indicator of hard times, at least for the broad mass of the population not invited to the ceremony but expected to foot the bill: here.
Butterflies and Weddings Don’t Mix: here.
Royal relative Pippa Middleton is in trouble after a friend threatened a photographer with a gun: here.
British Prince Consort Philip: here.
Pingback: North Korea after Kim Jong-Il’s death | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Administrator on May 10, 2011 at 9:15 pm said:
Monarchy has its uses
Socialist Worker clearly did not like the royal wedding. But many are fascinated with the royal family, and they may not be as foolish as you think.
Royalty are unelected. But when did most of us last elect our managements?
Employees have no say in those who have power over our lives.
Ceremonial figureheads do have a use in keeping the pomp and circumstance away from elected politicians.
This enables them to get on with the job and avoids them becoming charismatic figures, which is a gift to the right.
I think we should concentrate on getting rid of capitalism, and realise why the royal family are so attractive to many.
Jonathan Goll, Birmingham
Guarding rich and powerful
The royal wedding showed the state of our nation and the divided nature of the class system.
The police and military are preparing for savage cuts, yet they policed this display of pomp and pageantry.
They were protecting the grotesquely rich and famous.
Jay Thompson, Newcastle
Shelley would not be stunned
After all the stomach-turning guff that’s been poured out about the royal wedding, perhaps the last word should go to the poet Shelley:
“Monarchy is only the string that ties the robber’s bundle.”
Ken Montague, West London
Royalty is a sham
I was a member of the Socialist Workers Party many years ago, and even though my membership is lapsed I still feel very strongly about its ideals.
The royal wedding only underpinned why I still believe in them.
The royals live in total opulence, indulgence and have a complete disregard for what the working class is up against in this time of capitalist domination.
As soon as the public can see the sham that is royalty for what they are, and not the media-fueled indoctrination we are force-fed, the better.
It won’t be soon enough.
Graham Chuck, South Brent, Devon
Pingback: Bahrain, dictatorship, resistance and British royals | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Expensive British royal jubilee | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Yemen, Bahrain revolutions on Dutch TV | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain jails human rights activists | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahraini torture prince to Olympics, British weapons to Bahrain | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahraini pro-democracy poetess tortured by royal | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain kangaroo court trials | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Facebook censors British strike news | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahraini poetess Ayat Al-Gormezi, journalist Al-Murshid, in danger | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Britain’s Cameron embraces Bahrain tyranny | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Irish against British royal visit | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Kate Middleton, British royals, and Berlusconi | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British royal pregnancy and US republic | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Sad Christmas for rich Britons | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain dictatorship police attacks women with grenades | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahrain dictatorship denies entry to human rights lawyer | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahraini teachers still persecuted | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Bahraini children tortured, Amnesty says | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British Prince Andrew’s gifts from Bahraini, other dictatorships | Dear Kitty. Some blog