Smash the criminal Murdoch media empire


Rupert Murdoch and underling Rebekah Brooks

By Owen Jones in Britain:

Murdoch’s press must meet its end

Tuesday 12 July 2011

It is a myth that we have a free press in this country.

We have a press that is free of direct government control, that is certainly true.

But instead the mainstream press is almost exclusively dominated by media barons with their own political agendas.

The News of the World phone-hacking scandal is becoming grubbier and, frankly, more stomach-churningly sickening by the day.

But it also shines a light on the nature of power in modern Britain.

A door has opened slightly so we can catch a glimpse of the murky links that exist between the political elite, media barons and the police.

It is crucial that we don’t get sucked into a narrative of bad eggs, that a purge of a few rotten individuals is all that is needed and things can broadly carry on as before.

This sordid story should put the way the British media is run into the spotlight.

If any good comes of this, it is a potentially crippling blow to the Murdoch empire.

The Australian-born US businessman is often named as one of the most powerful men in Britain.

As we all know, prime ministers court his favour and cower in fear of his wrath.

There is no more glaring example of how our democracy is distorted by media power than Murdoch’s empire.

A full-on Twitter uprising waged against the News of the World played a major role in forcing a number of companies to withdraw advertising from the paper.

But the News International brand – and all of its associated papers – have been severely tarnished. Murdoch‘s power has undoubtedly been weakened.

Competing with Silvio Berlusconi, Murdoch is the most notorious media mogul, but other than the Guardian – which is managed by the Scott Trust – the entire mainstream press is in the hands of wealthy plutocrats.

The journalists themselves come from unrepresentative backgrounds. According to the Sutton Trust, over half of the top 100 journalists are privately educated, with not many over one in 10 having attended a comprehensive school.

No wonder we end up with biased, right-wing coverage resulting in attacks on public services by those who don’t use them but resent paying taxes to fund them, opposing the 50p tax band – unlike the general public, as polls repeatedly show that many of them found themselves placed in – and ignoring or attacking working-class communities they have had no contact with.

The Murdoch press is far from alone, but it is renowned for its union-bashing.

If the NUJ was actually recognised and able to organise, journalists may have stuck to the union’s code of conduct and been able to resist being bullied by ruthless and amoral managers.

If good is to come out of this whole affair, it is to call for a total overhaul of our over-powerful, unrepresentative, amoral press.

As a minimum we should support the break-up of media monopolies – no businessperson should be able to control more than one daily newspaper, and they must be barred from having any simultaneous stake in broadcasting.

That would at least limit the power that a single mogul has over elected governments.

We should also fight for the unionisation of all journalists and for recognition agreements in all newspapers.

That would help stop journalists being bullied by those above into conducting the sorts of outrages that are being revealed by the day.

We should also put the focus on just how unrepresentative our media is of the society it exists to serve.

That means tackling issues like the death of local newspapers which once gave working-class aspiring journalists a step on the ladder.

Unpaid internships and poorly paid starter jobs that only the wealthy can afford, not to mention the emphasis on hugely expensive qualifications such as the City University journalism course, continue to exacerbate this problem.

But we could also be more radical. We should fight for a free press, and that means a media no longer run by oligarchs.

The internet revolution has posed a challenge to the current structure of the British media, but it’s not enough – online content is itself often dominated by old-style media providers.

We need to look at democratically managed newspapers run by not-for-profit trusts perhaps with elected representatives of readers on management boards.

Let’s not just stand back while News International throws a few sacrificial lambs to the wolves.

Let’s call for the total transformation of a media that is way out of control and distorting our democracy.

This could be the moment that the British press just pushed the British people too far and could prove the opening shot for a movement for a genuinely free press.

Owen Jones is the author of Chavs: The Demonisation of the Working Class, out now on Verso.

MURDOCH WATCH: Blogging the Hacking Scandal: here.

Do Murdoch, Murdoch and Brooks have the balls to face Parliament? Here.

Scotland Yard Accuses Murdoch Empire of Attempting to Undermine Hacking Investigation: here.

Murdoch Phone Hacking Scandal Gets Scant Coverage on Fox and Other Right-Wing Propoganda Outlets: here.

Gordon Brown Alleges Shuttered Murdoch Paper Hired “Known Criminals”: here. And here.

Murdoch Gets Rich Off High-Profile Evangelicals. Frank Schaeffer, AlterNet: “Here’s what you might not know about Rupert Murdoch: he’s one of the leading religion publishers in the world. Rupert Murdoch is one of America’s number one publishers of evangelical and other religious books, including the 33-million seller Purpose Driven Life by mega pastor and anti-gay activist Rick Warren. Murdoch is also publisher of ‘progressive’ Rob Bell’s Love Wins”: here.

Will News Corp face investigation in the US? Here.

8 thoughts on “Smash the criminal Murdoch media empire

  1. TRUTHOUT’S BUZZFLASH DAILY HEADLINES

    The hacking of phones and invasion of privacy by the Rupert Murdoch tabloid press has been the subject of articles for years, but it took the unconscionable and illegal extracting and deleting of messages from the mobile phone of a dead British girl to bring the Murdoch empire to its knees.

    Murdoch, it appears now, had bought off police, politicians, and who knows who else, as he swaggered across the Western world, creating a false, angry, populist worldview through a vast media empire. The sole purpose of this emotional, incendiary and deceptive narrative was to create governments that supported the plutocracy, not the “rabble” of democracy. The tool to accomplish this was the manipulation of the mass media to ignore facts and create a fictional “frame” that pushed populations toward acceptance of an authoritarian state, one that existed for the benefit of the wealthy.

    Franklin Delano Roosevelt knew the danger of a Murdoch controlling, in an Orwellian fashion, the media, and the danger of the likes of the Koch Brothers financing propaganda – through lavish support of think tanks and front “activist” organizations – as well as a government run by corporate lobbyists. Whether it is ownership of the media, concentrated control of the assets of a nation by a few, or de facto corporate governance through campaign contribution leverage on Congress and the White House, Roosevelt warned:

    The liberty of a democracy is not safe if the people tolerate the growth of private power to a point where it comes stronger than their democratic state itself. That, in its essence, is fascism – ownership of government by an individual, by a group.

    In his second inaugural speech FDR declared:

    We had to struggle with the old enemies of peace – business and financial monopoly, speculation, reckless banking, class antagonism, sectionalism, war profiteering.

    They had begun to consider the Government of the United States as a mere appendage to their own affairs. We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.

    Never before in all our history have these forces been so united against one candidate as they stand today. They are unanimous in their hate for me – and I welcome their hatred.

    How little has changed since those remarks were made in 1936, except there is no FDR in the White House to champion the cause of democracy for those 99 percent of Americans who are not part of “organized money.”

    Mark Karlin
    Editor, BuzzFlash at Truthout

    Like

  2. Pingback: Berlusconi party corruption investigation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Rupert Murdoch scandal update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Rupert Murdoch-Tony Blair quarrel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: British nuclear weapons and elections | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Ruling classes and conspiracy theories | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Rupert Murdoch’s new Sun scandals | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Donald Trump’s CIA coup against British Labour? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.