People’s movement, not NATO invasion, can bring democracy

This video from the USA is called Massacre in Libya: Witnesses Say Protesters Have Taken Control of Benghazi Despite Gov’t Violence.

How can the violent regime of Colonel Gadaffi in Libya be replaced by democracy? In the same way as the Greek colonels’ regime fell in 1974. That Greek dictatorship was overthrown by a people’s mass movement from below. Not by bloody NATO invasion from abroad. Quite the contrary: for years, NATO had been happy to work with the anti- communist Greek dictators. Like they co-operated for decades with the Salazarist fascist dictatorship in Portugal as an official NATO member; and with the Franco dictatorship in Spain as an unofficial NATO partner.

For years, NATO country politicians like Tony Blair and Silvio Berlusconi, Western big businessmen and generals have worked hand in glove with the Gadaffi regime.

Now that Gadaffi may be about to fall, there is a tendency in the Western establishment to maybe replace him with, not a bone fide democracy from below, but with a dictatorship imposed by NATO invasion. A dictatorship which would safeguard multinational corporations’ access to Libyan oil; like they hoped that Bush’s Iraq 2003 war would guarantee access to Iraqi oil.

The Libyan democrats will turn out not to like that; like Iraqi democrats did not like George W Bush’s and Donald Rumsfeld‘ s invasion. A Libyan exile, interviewed by Dutch NOS TV this week, claimed that airplanes were bombing Libyan neighbourhoods. Some of those planes, he said, may be not Gadaffi Libyan, but Italian. He execrated Berlusconi for this. So, pro intervention NATO politicians might get a long bloody war like in Iraq as the result of an invasion in Libya. Not a smooth transition to a model puppet oil dictatorship, as George W Bush hoped in early 2003 about Iraq.

As this blog wrote in 2006 about Saddam Hussein (different in many aspects from Gadaffi, but similar in the “humanitarian intervention” from above and abroad, versus pro democracy mass movement from below dilemma):

As for “removing” Saddam Hussein by bloody war: why not in the same way as happened with Pinochet; the Greek colonels’ dictatorship; the Portuguese NATO fascists; Marcos in the Philippines; Mobutu in Congo; Suharto in Indonesia; apartheid in South Africa; Washington’s bloody stooges in Bolivia recently and Venezuela of the 1980s and early 1990s: by the people?

Oh, duh, because people like Cheney and Rumsfeld supported these dictators for ages.

Like they supported Saddam Hussein, already a CIA asset in the 1960s

So, again, Saddam’s removal by the people, like what happened to the dictators of Indonesia, Greece, etc. would have been much better than this war with over 600,000 Iraqi dead and counting; thousands US dead and counting …

By now, estimates of numbers of Iraqi dead are over a million.

By Ann Talbot, about Libya today:

Calls mount for military intervention in Libya

25 February 2011

The British government is actively considering sending Special Forces troops to Libya, on the pretext of rescuing 170 workers trapped in isolated oil exploration encampments, as fighting continues there amid mass uprisings against the regime of Colonel Muammar Gaddafi.

Reports from inside Libya were fragmentary, due to fighting and limitations on foreign media imposed by the Gaddafi regime. They suggested that Misurata, Libya’s third-largest city, was in the hands of anti-Gaddafi forces, with fighting moving to cities such as Zawiya and al-Khums, that are closer to Libya’s capital, Tripoli. Gaddafi also broadcast another belligerent speech today, blaming the uprising on Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden and claiming that protesters were on drugs.

British Foreign Secretary William Hague said that he did not rule out the possibility of sending Special Forces to Libya.


From Lenin’s Tomb blog in Britain:

So, I’ve been keeping track in my mind of the connections between Qadhafi and the Third Way, since it turned out that Blair and Mandelson were tight with the dictator’s son. This morning, I found out that Qadhafi’s international lobbying operation, involved Richard Perle, Francis Fukuyama, Bernard Lewis, Dick Cheney and … Anthony Giddens.

As the protests against Colonel Moamer Kadhafi continued in Libya on Friday, Eritrean refugees and immigrants in the country said that they feared for their safety. Groups of Eritreans in Tripoli and Benghazi told RFI about violent attacks against them and describe the inadequate response to their plight, as other foreign citizens are repatriated: here.

Cypriot President Dimitris Christofias has vowed to veto a Bill that would see the divided country join Nato’s so-called Partnership for Peace programme: here.

3 thoughts on “People’s movement, not NATO invasion, can bring democracy

  1. Libya: Popular democratic uprising in favour of a pro-western regime?

    Arundhati Roy is an intellectual icon of the resistance against
    globalisation. Recently we asked her what she thinks about the
    democratic movements in the Arab world. Her answer was that the support
    those rebellions enjoy in the western media makes her rather anxious.
    How this fact can be interpreted?

    The Egyptian movement was quite a challenge for the regimes of the west,
    as Mubarak was one of the most important pro-western dictators. His
    regime protected Israel and in return received billions of military aid
    each year. In the true spirit of neoliberalism, Washington also
    outsourced torture to Cairo. At the same time, the lords of the world
    have continued to as the keepers of the Holy Grail they call democracy.

    The Tunisian movement was so powerful that it forced the US regime to
    back down from its support, while the former colonial power—France—still
    supported their torture interrogator Ben Ali.

    In Libya on the other hand, the world seems to be alright again. The
    hacks are dancing again to the tune pattern employed against
    Saddam–Milošević–Ahmadinejad. It doesn’t help Qaddhafi that the west has
    been doing good business with him for many years, while he in turn keeps
    the African have-nots out of sight for the EU fortress and supports
    French colonial policy in Chad. For his people and for the Arab world,
    the ageing leader of the revolution has been continuing to mime the
    anti-imperialist, increasingly clownish and devoid of contents. On the
    other side of the Mediterranean, they are now propping up this faded
    anti-imperialist as an enemy for quasi-posthumous revenge against the
    old Qaddhafi.

    The present bear hug is the worst burden to weigh down the democratic
    movement. If it wants to be democratic, it has to reject western
    support, otherwise Qaddhafi could regain legitimacy. Those who really
    want to support the popular movement have to resolutely oppose sanctions
    (let’s not forget the slow genocides in Iraq in the name of “democracy”
    and in Gaza right now); of course we also have to fight any military

    continue reading:


  2. Pingback: Sarkozy, Assad, Mubarak | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Greek government’s anti-democratic policies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.