This is a Dutch video about action in the Netherlands against Shell pollution in Nigeria.
Translated from Dutch site Blik op Nieuws today:
Amsterdam – Shell refuses to disclose documents to three Nigerians and Friends of the Earth in the Netherlands. Those documents might shed more light on the circumstances surrounding leaks from Shell oil pipelines in the Niger Delta.
See also here.
Talking about Big Oil: Amazon Defense Coalition: Indigenous Amazon Victims Call for Chevron to End Attempts to Sabotage Court System: here.
I worked for RDS Procurment for over 27 yrs till 2001 and during most of that time we had standing (blanket) orders for Pipe Clamps for SPDC Nigeria which from 8″ up to 42″ and we airfreighted some of these many a times. These clamps were used to close the holes in the pipelines that were drilled by the Nigerians so that they could get the oil and use it for fuel and to light their homes etc.
Near the end the Nigerians would drill holes in the pipes then come to Shell and complain that the “leak” was polluting the environment and demand money to help them “clean” the “leak” up. This of course was after they took as much product as they needed. It was and I am sure that it still is nothing but extortion and a scam.
Re #1: if things would be really as you claim, of bad bad Nigerians and noble blameless Big Oil corporations like Shell, then why does not Shell hand over the documents, as, supposedly, they have nothing to hide, and the documents would exonerate them?
Are you going to claim as well that the BP fat cats in the Gulf of Mexico are blameless, and the disaster is all the fault of the eleven workers who died (the workers had warned BP bosses about safety but the bosses did not want to listen), of the Louisiana shrimp fishermen, and of the sea turtles dying by the hundreds now, with very probably many more to come?
Here, a more realistic picture of the situation in Nigeria:
Nigeria’s ignored catastrophe dwarfs US oil spill
4:00 AM Saturday Jun 5, 2010
The Deepwater Horizon disaster has been reported around the world, yet the people who live in the Niger delta have had to live with huge oils spills for decades. And now they are calling for international law to step in. John Vidal reports
People evacuate their homes as smoke and flames billow from a burning oil pipeline belonging to Shell. Photo / AP
We reached the edge of the oil spill near the Nigerian village of Otuegwe after a long hike through cassava plantations.
Ahead of us lay swamp. We waded into the warm tropical water and began swimming, cameras and notebooks held above our heads.
We could smell the oil long before we saw it – the stench of garage forecourts and rotting vegetation hanging thickly in the air.
The farther we travelled, the more nauseating it became.
Soon we were swimming in pools of light Nigerian crude, the best-quality oil in the world.
One of the hundreds of 40-year-old pipelines that crisscross the Niger delta had corroded and spewed oil for several months.
Forest and farmland were now covered in a sheen of greasy oil. Drinking wells were polluted and people were distraught. No one knew how much oil had leaked.
“We lost our nets, huts and fishing pots,” says Chief Promise, village leader of Otuegwe and our guide.
“This is where we fished and farmed. We have lost our forest. We told Shell of the spill within days, but they did nothing for six months.”
That was the Niger delta a few years ago, where, say Nigerian academics, writers and environment groups, oil companies have acted with such impunity and recklessness that much of the region has been devastated by leaks.
In fact, more oil is spilled from the delta’s network of terminals, pipes, pumping stations and oil platforms every year than has been lost in the Gulf of Mexico catastrophe.
That BP disaster has made headlines round the world. By contrast, little information has emerged about the damage inflicted on the Niger delta. Yet the destruction there provides us with a far more accurate picture of the price we have to pay for drilling oil today.
On May 1 this year a ruptured ExxonMobil pipeline in Ibeno in the state of Akwa Ibom spilled more than a million gallons into the delta over seven days before the leak was stopped. Local people demonstrated against the company but say they were attacked by security guards.
Community leaders are now demanding US$1 billion (NZ$1.46 billion) in compensation for the illness and loss of livelihood they suffered. Few expect they will succeed. In the meantime, thick balls of tar are being washed up along the coast.
Within days of the Ibeno spill, thousands of barrels of oil were spilled when the nearby Shell Trans Niger pipeline was attacked by rebels.
A few days after that, a large oil slick was found floating on Lake Adibawa in Bayelsa state and another in Ogoniland. “We are faced with incessant oil spills from rusty pipes, some of which are 40 years old,” says Bonny Otavie, a Bayelsa MP.
This point was backed by Williams Mkpa, a community leader in Ibeno: “Oil companies do not value our life; they want us to all die. In the past two years, we have experienced 10 oil spills and fishermen can no longer sustain their families. It is not tolerable.”
With 606 oilfields, the Niger delta supplies 40 per cent of all the crude the United States imports and is the world capital of oil pollution.
Life expectancy in its rural communities, half of which have no access to clean water, has fallen to little more than 40 years over the past two generations.
Locals blame the oil that pollutes their land and can scarcely believe the contrast with the steps taken by BP and the US government to try to stop the Gulf oil leak and to protect the Louisiana shoreline.
“If this Gulf accident had happened in Nigeria, neither the government nor the company would have paid much attention,” says the writer Ben Ikari, of the Ogoni people.
“This kind of spill happens all the time in the delta.”
“The oil companies just ignore it. The lawmakers do not care and people must live with pollution daily. The situation is now worse than it was 30 years ago. Nothing is changing. When I see the efforts that are being made in the US I feel a great sense of sadness at the double standards.
What they do in the US or in Europe is very different.”
“We see frantic efforts being made to stop the spill in the US,” says Nnimo Bassey, Nigerian head of Friends of the Earth International.
“But in Nigeria, oil companies largely ignore their spills, cover them up and destroy people’s livelihood and environments. The Gulf spill can be seen as a metaphor for what is happening daily in the oilfields of Nigeria and other parts of Africa. This has gone on for 50 years in Nigeria.
People depend completely on the environment for their drinking water and farming and fishing. They are amazed that the president of the US can be making speeches daily, because in Nigeria people there would not hear a whimper,” he says.
It is impossible to know how much oil is spilled in the Niger delta each year because the companies and the government keep that secret.
However, two major independent investigations over the past four years suggest that as much is spilled at sea, in the swamps and on land every year as has been lost in the Gulf of Mexico so far.
According to Nigerian federal government figures, there were more than 7000 spills between 1970 and 2000, and there are 2000 official major spillage sites, many going back decades, with thousands of smaller ones still waiting to be cleared up.
More than 1000 spill cases have been filed against Shell.
Last month Shell admitted to spilling 14,000 tonnes of oil in 2009. The majority, says the company, was lost through two incidents – one in which the company claims that thieves damaged a wellhead at its Odidi field and another where militants bombed the Trans Escravos pipeline.
Shell, which works in partnership with the Nigerian Government in the delta, says 98 per cent of all its oil spills are caused by vandalism, theft or sabotage by militants and only a minimal amount by deteriorating infrastructure. “We had 132 spills last year, as against 175 on average.
Safety valves were vandalised; one pipe had 300 illegal taps. We found five explosive devices on one. Sometimes communities do not give us access to clean up the pollution because they can make more money from compensation,” says a spokesman.
“We have a full-time oil spill response team. Last year we replaced 197 miles of pipeline and we are using every known way to clean up pollution, including microbes. We are committed to cleaning up any spill as fast as possible as soon as and for whatever reason they occur.”
These claims are hotly disputed by communities and environmental watchdog groups. They mostly blame the companies’ vast network of rusting pipes and storage tanks, corroding pipelines, semi-derelict pumping stations and old wellheads, as well as dumping from tankers and vessels.
The sense of outrage is widespread. “There are more than 300 spills, major and minor, a year,” says Bassey. “It happens all the year round. The whole environment is devastated. The latest revelations highlight the massive difference in the response to oil spills. In Nigeria, both companies and Government have come to treat an extraordinary level of oil spills as the norm.”
Ben Amunwa, of the London-based oil watch group Platform, says: “Deepwater Horizon may have exceeded Exxon Valdez, but within a few years in Nigeria offshore spills from four locations dwarfed the scale of the Exxon Valdez disaster many times over.
Estimates put spill volumes in the Niger delta among the worst on the planet, but they do not include the crude oil from waste water and gas flares. Companies such as Shell continue to avoid independent monitoring and keep key data secret.”
Judith Kimerling, a professor of law and policy at the City University of New York and author of Amazon Crude, a book about oil development in Ecuador, says: “Spills, leaks and deliberate discharges are happening in oilfields all over the world and very few people seem to care.”
There is an overwhelming sense that the big oil companies act as if they are beyond the law. Bassey says: “What we conclude from the Gulf of Mexico pollution incident is that the oil companies are out of control.
“It is clear that BP has been blocking progressive legislation, both in the US and here. In Nigeria, they have been living above the law.
“They are now clearly a danger to the planet. The dangers of this happening again and again are high. They must be taken to the international court of justice.”
Pingback: Nigerian feminist against Chevron pollution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Ghanaian riches for oil multinationals, poverty for the people? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Nigeria’s kidnapped girls, oil and foreign armies | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Oil disaster in Israeli nature reserve | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Shell fraud and corruption in Nigeria revealed | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Nigerians commemorate hanged environmentalists | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Saturday 19th December 2015
posted by Morning Star in World
A Hague appeals court has ruled that Dutch judges have jurisdiction in a case between a group of Nigerian farmers and oil transnational Shell over pollution blamed on leaking oil pipes.
The court also ordered Shell to give the farmers and environmental activists access to documents that could shed more light on the case.
Four Nigerian farmers allege that Shell is liable for damages caused by leaks from two underground oil pipes.
Pingback: Shell scandal in Bulgaria | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Shell pollution in Nigeria, trial in England? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Nigerian widows accuse Shell of murder | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Amnesty accuses Shell of murder, rape, torture of Nigerians | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Shell boss gets much richer, Shell workers don’t | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Nigerian widows of murdered activists accuse Shell | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Shell accused of bribery in Nigeria | Dear Kitty. Some blog