US Bush administration authorized torture


This video from the USA is called Mancow: Waterboarding is Torture: Olbermann.

By Shannon Jones:

The Dark Side by Jane Mayer

A chronicle of US war crimes

By Shannon Jones

17 January 2009

The Dark Side: The Inside Story of How the War on Terror Turned into a War on American Ideals by Jane Mayer, Doubleday 2008, 392 pp.

In The Dark Side, Jane Mayer, a staff writer for the New Yorker magazine, presents a detailed account of the assault on democratic rights and international legal standards pursued by the Bush administration in the name of the war on terror.

Mayer has written a number of articles on the torture practices of the Bush administration. Her colleague at the New Yorker, Seymour Hersh, wrote the first extensive exposé of the US abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq.

Mayer notes that under Bush the United States gained the notorious distinction of being the first nation to ever authorize violations of the Geneva Conventions. In a September 2006 press conference, President Bush mocked the language of the Geneva Conventions, asking sarcastically, “What does that mean? ‘Outrages upon human dignity’?”

According to Mayer’s account, President Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and top officials in the CIA and Pentagon were all involved in the authorization of actions that are prosecutable as war crimes under the Geneva Conventions as well as US and international law.

The role of the White House in authorizing war crimes has been officially confirmed. A US Senate report released December 11, 2008 states that top ranking White House officials planned and ordered the torture of prisoners at Abu Ghraib and Guantánamo. Those named include Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld.

From October 2003 until May 2005, I was illegally detained by the U.S. government and held in CIA-run “black sites” with no contact with the outside world: here.

6 thoughts on “US Bush administration authorized torture

  1. Posted by: “frankofbos” FrankOfBos@yahoo.com

    Sat Jan 17, 2009 12:22 am (PST)

    Bush History: A Hero is Born, A Disgrace Takes Office, & the Brave Die
    Needlessly-1/16

    On this date: a national hero is born in Boston (1706) and a national
    disgrace first takes public office, in Texas (1995). Also, a grim death
    milestone is set in Iraq (2004), while a 2007 report reveals Bush admin
    arrogant miscalculation, which could easily have resulted in some of
    those lost lives. In 2008 Bush gives a man who is no friend of
    democracy high praise.

    More details, from the 2009 Bush Blunder Calendar …
    http://poorgeorgesalmanac.com/?p=1437

    Today’s category: Failing the Troops, Foreign Policy Foul Ups, Grim
    Milestones, Hypocrisy, Ignoring Experts, Iraq

    Like

  2. Jan 17, 4:53 AM EST

    Sources: Obama ready to end harsh interrogations

    By LARA JAKES and PAMELA HESS
    Associated Press Writers

    WASHINGTON (AP) — President-elect Barack Obama is preparing to prohibit the use of waterboarding and harsh interrogation techniques by ordering the CIA to follow military rules for questioning prisoners, according to two U.S. officials familiar with drafts of the plans. Still under debate is whether to include a loophole that would allow exceptions in extraordinary cases.

    The proposal Obama is considering would require all CIA interrogators to follow conduct outlined in the U.S. Army Field Manual, the officials said. The plans would also have the effect of shutting down secret “black site” prisons around the world where the CIA has questioned terror suspects – with all future interrogations taking place inside American military facilities.

    However, Obama’s changes may not be absolute. His advisers are considering adding a classified loophole to the rules that could allow the CIA to use some interrogation methods not specifically authorized by the Pentagon, the officials said, although the intent is not to use that as an opening for possible use of waterboarding.

    The new rules would abandon a part of President George W. Bush’s counterterrorism policy that has been condemned internationally. Bush has defended his policies by pointing to the fact that the nation has gone more than seven years without another terrorist attack on its soil.

    Obama spokeswoman Brooke Anderson did not have an immediate comment Friday about the drafted plans, which the two officials discussed only on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to comment publicly.

    No final decisions have been made about how to adjust the government’s interrogation standards. Obama is still weighing whether to alter interrogation policy by executive order during his first days in office or working with Congress through legislation.

    The plans do not specifically address the issue of extraordinary rendition, the policy of transferring foreign terrorism suspects to third countries without court approval.

    In private Capitol Hill meetings, CIA Director nominee Leon Panetta and Director of National Intelligence designate Dennis Blair have said Obama wants a single set of rules for interrogations. And in Senate testimony Thursday, Attorney General nominee Eric Holder called the Army manual “a good place to start.”

    The 384-page Army manual, last updated in September 2006, is a publicly available document. It authorizes 19 interrogation methods used to question prisoners, including one allowing a detainee to be isolated from other inmates in some cases. The manual explicitly prohibits threats, coercion, physical abuse and waterboarding, which creates the sensation of drowning. Holder termed waterboarding a form of torture on Thursday.

    The CIA also banned waterboarding in 2006 but otherwise has been secretive about how it conducts interrogations. In the past, its methods are believed to have included sleep deprivation and disorientation, stress positions and exposing prisoners to uncomfortable cold or heat for long periods. It’s also believed that some prisoners have been forced to sit in cramped spaces with bugs, snakes, rats or other vermin as a scare tactic.

    Waterboarding has been traced back hundreds of years and is condemned by nations worldwide. U.S. officials waterboarded at least three top al-Qaida operatives – including 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheik Mohammed – in 2002 and 2003 because of fears that more attacks were imminent.

    The Army manual can be amended by the military. It is unclear whether the CIA would be held to the one published in 2006 or future versions.

    For Obama, who repeatedly insisted during the 2008 presidential campaign and the transition period that “America doesn’t torture,” a classified loophole would allow him to follow through on his promise to end harsh interrogations while retaining a full range of presidential options in conducting the war against terrorism.

    The proposed loophole, which could come in the form of a classified annex to the manual, is designed to satisfy intelligence experts who fear that an outright ban of so-called enhanced interrogation techniques would limit the government in obtaining threat information that could save American lives. It would also preserve Obama’s flexibility to authorize any interrogation tactics he might deem necessary for national security.

    However, such a move would frustrate Senate Democrats and human rights, retired military and religious groups that have pressed for a government-wide prohibition on methods they describe as torture.

    Glenn Sulmasy, an international law professor at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy in New London, Conn., said Obama can and should preserve his executive authority to order aggressive interrogations when necessary. But he said that should be done on a case-by-case basis and not become a broad policy.

    “There are some coercive techniques that he might employ on a ticking time bomb scenario, but he’ll distinguish himself by making it clear that the presumption under the law is that there is no torture,” Sulmasy said Friday.

    Critics, however, said Obama cannot claim to ban torture if it’s not clear what interrogation methods will be allowed.

    “That would not be good,” said the Rev. Richard Killmer, executive director of the National Religious Campaign Against Torture. “We don’t need to be able to torture and we don’t need to engage in any interrogation techniques that are not humane. And unless we have absolute clarity that these interrogation techniques will not be used, they are not going to be able to say that.”

    Speaking with reporters Thursday, outgoing CIA Director Michael Hayden said harsh interrogation tactics have been needed to get information from the most hardened terror suspects. He and some other U.S. intelligence officials oppose limiting the CIA to the Army manual, which was written specifically for military interrogations and may not be effective on the most dangerous detainees.

    “It is an honest discussion to talk about what techniques we should use, but to assume automatically that the Army Field Manual would suit the needs of the republic in all circumstances is a shot in the dark,” Hayden said.

    Senate Democrats aren’t likely to support a classified annex. Holder on Thursday said the interrogation methods outlined in the Army manual would be just as effective as those used by the CIA.

    “I’m not convinced at all that if we restrict ourselves to the Army field manual that we will be in any way less effective in the interrogation of people who have sworn to do us harm,” Holder said.

    Like

  3. Posted by: “frankofbos” FrankOfBos@yahoo.com

    Sat Jan 17, 2009 11:41 pm (PST)

    Bush History: GOPers Beg Bush to Show Real Leadership, & Bush Atty Gen.
    Loses It-1/18

    While newspapers describe an Iraq that is a mess on this date in 2006
    George ‘stay the course’ Bush paints a different picture. Also in
    2006, GOPers from previous administrations beg Bush to start showing
    real leadership. Come 2007 Bush Atty Gen. Gonzales makes a truly
    bizarre argument in Congress, and a Bush misstep with China comes back
    to haunt him.

    More details, from the 2009 Bush Blunder Calendar …
    http://poorgeorgesalmanac.com/?p=1446

    Today’s category: Constitutional Abuse, Foreign Policy Foul Ups, Global
    Warming Denial, Human Rights/Human Wrongs, Iraq, Revolt of the GOP &
    Insiders, The Corporation’s Yes Man, The Polluter’s Friend

    Like

  4. Posted by: “frankofbos” FrankOfBos@yahoo.com

    Mon Jan 19, 2009 12:05 am (PST)

    Bush History: 3 Bush Insiders Slam 3 Bush Policies, & Bush’s Last
    Full Day
    Bush History: Three Bush Insiders Slam Three Bush Policies, & Bush’s
    Last Full Day!-1/19

    Three Bush insiders slamming three Bush policies are in the news on
    this date (2006 and 2007). It is an appropriate ‘end of Bush’ send-
    off for an administration whose failures are so glaringly obvious
    that thy can’t be denied, even by administration insiders. Also a
    well-worded, funny prediction regarding Bush’s post White House years.

    More details, from the 2009 Bush Blunder Calendar …
    http://poorgeorgesalmanac.com/?p=1454

    Today’s category: Constitutional Abuse, Foreign Policy Foul Ups,
    Global Warming Denial, Human Rights/Human Wrongs, Iraq, Revolt of the
    GOP & Insiders, The Corporation’s Yes Man, The Polluter’s Friend

    Like

  5. Pingback: Abu Ghraib torture, ten years later | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Trump brings Iraq war ‘mastermind’ Bolton back | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.