25 thoughts on “British government-corporate complex harms anti-obesity fight

  1. Pingback: Diet guru Montignac dies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Chains pour salt into the young

    Health: Meals for children at some of Britain’s leading pub and fast food chains contain more salt than they should eat in an entire day, a study has found.
    Lunches containing more than the recommended 4g of salt were found at popular family restaurants including Wetherspoons, Harvester and Nando’s, Consensus Action on Salt and Health said.
    Nando’s and Wetherspoons both had children’s meals containing three times as much salt as a McDonald’s Happy Meal of a hamburger and fries.


    See also



  3. Pingback: London Olympics, corporate games? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Poor Americans’ lives getting shorter | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Excellent post! Thank you!
    I saw a special a couple of years ago citing the same points. And now see it more and more with the rise of health care rates and changes in your health care choices with a deductible being met first. Last week I went to a health insurance seminar and learned that diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, ulcers, back pain, and depression are the top conditions that are paid out expenses from your health insurance providers. I guess that says it all!

    Definitely reblogging this on my reblog page!


  6. Pingback: Hunger in the USA, new documentary film | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. HEALTH: More girls under 20 are overweight or obese in Britain than anywhere else in western Europe, alarming new research showed yesterday.

    In this age group, 29.2 per cent of the British population are overweigh. Just over 8 per cent of the girls meet the clinical definition of obesity, having a body mass index of 30 or above.

    Only Greece is on a par with Britain for girls under 21, with 0.1 per cent lower prevalence.



  8. Pingback: British Labour politician admits Blair made inequality worse | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: David Cameron’s ‘Big Society’ is Big Corruption | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Charles Dickens-age diseases returning to Cameron’s Britain | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Hunger for millions of Britons | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Saturday 12th December 2015

    posted by Morning Star in Editorial

    ENGLAND’s chief medical officer (CMO) Dame Sally Davies ducks the most important issue concerning women’s obesity in her latest annual report.

    She is right to point to the magnitude of the problem, although equating it with terrorism and cyber-crime is to sensationalise — and thereby risk trivialising — it. She is right, too, to call for tackling obesity among the population at large to be a national priority.

    Obesity increases the risk of contracting cancer, type two diabetes, heart disorders and other diseases. It can drastically reduce both the quality and length of life.

    One quarter of adults in Britain have a body mass index which categorises them as not only overweight but obese, with a slightly higher rate in Scotland and a lower one — although not for children — in Wales.

    While a higher proportion of men than women are obese, the situation is reversed for young women (aged 16-24).

    Dame Sally’s report, The Health of the 51 per cent: Women, contains numerous and detailed recommendations to address obesity as it manifests itself in the different stages of women’s lives, including the prenatal and perinatal periods and the menopause.

    It also contains other vital sections on gender-based violence and mental health which should not be overlooked.

    But in presenting her report, England’s CMO proposes little to combat obesity on the scale required, beyond calling upon manufacturers and retailers to cease manufacturing and promoting unhealthy food or face a “sugar tax.”

    While the former would be beneficial, the latter would also punish the poor with higher prices without greatly changing people’s diets.

    This brings us to the enormous elephant in the room. The reality is that many people’s eating habits, obesity and physical health are closely related to their income and social class.

    This has been widely known in professional and academic circles since at least the publication of the Black Report, which the Thatcher government tried to suppress in 1980.

    Today, countless studies in Britain, the US, Australia and elsewhere confirm the link between socioeconomic status, income, poverty, obesity, ill health and life expectancy.

    This link is particuarly strong in the case of women. For example, whereas between 29 and 35 per cent of female manual workers in England are obese, compared with 18-21 per cent of female managers and professionals, the proportions for men are 24-27 and 20-24 per cent respectively.

    In the poorest 40 per cent of English households, 31 per cent of women are obese, compared with 24-29 per cent of men. In the highest-income fifth, on the other hand, the proportions are 19 and 24 per cent. The same disparities exist among children, but are even more pronounced.

    While some authors in Dame Sally’s report mention social status and low income as a factor exacerbating women’s obesity, nowhere is this elaborated and addressed.

    The political, social and cultural implications of doing so would be vast.

    It would mean putting an end to gender pay discrimination and poverty wages, increasing welfare benefits — especially for parents and carers — instead of cutting them, investing massively in health services — including for women — instead of squeezing budgets in the quest for £20 billion “efficiency savings,” making leisure and fitness facilities easily available for all instead of raising charges or curtailing them, and making playing fields and parks safe and accessible for children instead of selling them off and sacking our few remaining park wardens.

    It would mean expanding public investment in information, education, services and health.

    Above all, it means women enjoying equality of income, wealth, aspiration and opportunity.



  13. Pingback: United States maternal death rate rising | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Chilean dictator Pinochet’s Chicago, USA economists | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Tax cuts for the rich, no opiate crisis money in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Diet guru Montignac dies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: European Union sponsored by Coca-Cola, other corporations | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Amazon sells too sugary food | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Bolsonaro’s Brazilian Amazon fires update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: British children’s cold hungry Christmas under Johnson | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Coronavirus disaster in Donald Trump’s USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.