Bush misused Iraq intelligence, US Senate says

This video from the USA is about ‘Iraqi WMD’ – Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Rice caught lying.

From “Jack” miscStonecutter@earthlink.net in the USA:

I know this is not news to those of us with IQs higher than room temperature, but what is important here is that this is now becoming the official position of the US government [legislative branch].

The wheels of justice turn slowly, but they grind finely.

See you at the War Crimes trials.


Bush misused Iraq intelligence: Senate report

by Randall Mikkelsen [Reuters]

Thu Jun 5, 1:23 PM ET

President George W. Bush and his top policymakers misstated Saddam Hussein’s links to terrorism and ignored doubts among intelligence agencies about Iraq‘s arms programs as they made a case for war, the Senate intelligence committee reported on Thursday.

The report shows an administration that “led the nation to war on false premises,” said the committee’s Democratic Chairman, Sen. John Rockefeller of West Virginia. Several Republicans on the committee protested its findings as a “partisan exercise.”

The committee studied major speeches by Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney and other officials in advance of the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in March 2003, and compared key assertions with intelligence available at the time.

Statements that Iraq had a partnership with al Qaeda were wrong and unsupported by intelligence, the report said.

It said that Bush’s and Cheney’s assertions that Saddam was prepared to arm terrorist groups with weapons of mass destruction for attacks on the United States contradicted available intelligence.

Such assertions had a strong resonance with a U.S. public, still reeling after al Qaeda’s September 11, 2001, attacks on the United States. Polls showed that many Americans believed Iraq played a role in the attacks, even long after Bush acknowledged in September 2003 that there was no evidence Saddam was involved.

The report also said administration prewar statements on Iraq’s weapons programs were backed up in most cases by available U.S. intelligence, but officials failed to reflect internal debate over those findings, which proved wrong.


The long-delayed Senate study supported previous reports and findings that the administration’s main cases for war — that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction and was spreading them to terrorists — were inaccurate and deeply flawed.

“The president and his advisors undertook a relentless public campaign in the aftermath of the (September 11) attacks to use the war against al Qaeda as a justification for overthrowing Saddam Hussein,” Rockefeller said in written commentary on the report.

“Representing to the American people that the two had an operational partnership and posed a single, indistinguishable threat was fundamentally misleading and led the nation to war on false premises.”

A statement to Congress by then-Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld that the Iraqi government hid weapons of mass destruction in facilities underground was not backed up by intelligence information, the report said. Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon said Rumsfeld‘s comments should be investigated further, but he stopped short of urging a criminal probe.

The committee voted 10-5 to approve the report, with two Republican lawmakers supporting it. Sen. Christopher Bond of Missouri and three other Republican panel members denounced the study in an attached dissent.


U.S. public opinion on the war, supportive at first, has soured, contributing to a dive in Bush’s popularity.

The conflict is likely to be a key issue in the November presidential election between Republican John McCain, who supports the war, and Democrat Barack Obama, who opposed the war from the start and says he would aim to pull U.S. troops out within 16 months of taking office in January 2009.

Rockefeller has announced his support for Obama.

The administration’s record in making its case for Iraq has also been cited by critics of Bush’s get-tough policy on Iran. They accuse Bush of overstating the potential threat of Iran’s nuclear program in order to justify the possible use of force.

A second report by the committee faulted the administration’s handling of December 2001 Rome meetings between defense officials and Iranian informants, which dealt with the Iran issue. It said department officials failed to share intelligence from the meeting, which Rockefeller said demonstrated a “fundamental disdain” for other intelligence agencies.

See also Barry Grey.

And Arianna Huffington.

The White House on Thursday backed off its repeated claim that “the entire world” had the same pre-war intelligence about Saddam Hussein’s weapons of mass destruction and ties to terrorists: here.

8 thoughts on “Bush misused Iraq intelligence, US Senate says

  1. Posted by: “frankofbos” FrankOfBos@yahoo.com frankofbos
    Mon Sep 8, 2008 12:57 am (PDT)
    Cheney Lies:I Know “with absolute certainty” Saddam has WMD Program
    (Bush History, 9/8)

    Cheney ties to convince the nation to risk their sons & daughters lives
    in war. Cheney says that he knows “with absolute certainty” that
    Saddam has an active WMD program. This despite US government experts
    who say that his key piece of evidence showed no such thing. Cheney
    kept that little tidbit to himself, as he took to the talk shows to
    spout his (not even) half-truths, consequences (and soldier’s lives) be


    Today’s categories: Iraq, Dishonesty, Proven Wrong


  2. Wednesday, Dec. 17, 2008 …

    Still, al-Zaidi may have done Bush a favor. In an ABC News interview the next day, the President conceded for the first time that al-Qaeda had no presence in Iraq before the U.S. invasion, adding, “So what?” In another news cycle, this admission would have dominated the headlines: that after the debunking of Bush’s original excuse for war–Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction–his argument that Iraq was a crucial nexus in the global war on terrorism also held no water. Thanks to al-Zaidi, nobody heard the other shoe drop.



  3. Pingback: Arrest Bush for torture, Amnesty says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Strauss-Kahn arrested, how about Bush (and Libya)? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: British Conservative says Bush, stay out of Europe | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: ‘Humanitarian’ wars, a book review | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: CIA spy scandal in the Netherlands on Pakistani nuclear proliferation | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Worst Americans of 2008 | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.