DNA research finds new animal species

This video is about elephants in Kruger park (South Africa).

From New Scientist:

‘Hidden’ species may be surprisingly common

* 00:01 19 July 2007
* NewScientist.com news service
* Phil McKenna

Cryptic speciesanimals that appear identical but are genetically quite distinct – may be much more widespread than previously thought. The findings could have major implications in areas ranging from biodiversity estimates and wildlife management, to our understanding of infectious diseases and evolution.

Reports of cryptic species have increased dramatically over the past two decades with the advent of relatively inexpensive DNA sequencing technology.

Markus Pfenninger and Klaus Schwenk, of the Goethe-Universitat in Frankfurt, Germany, analysed all known data on cryptic animal species and discovered that they are found in equal proportions throughout all major branches of the animal kingdom and occur in equal numbers in all biogeographical regions. …

Examples of cryptic species include the African elephant. A 2001 study found the elephants were actually two genetically distinct, non-interbreeding species, the African bush elephant and the African elephant. The species are currently listed as vulnerable and threatened, respectively, by the World Conservation Union. In the case of the neotropical skipper butterfly, genetic testing revealed the “species” was actually 10 distinct cryptic species.

Mistaken mosquitoes

The reclassifications are more than an academic exercise. They define populations that have evolved independently of each other and whose genetic differences can have significant consequences.

In the early 1900s misidentification of mosquito species based on morphology confounded attempts to control malaria in Europe. Ultimately, what was thought to be a single species was actually made up of six sibling species, only three of which transmitted the disease.

“The basic unit in biology is always the species, and you have to know what you are dealing with,” Pfenninger says. Much previous research is now obsolete, he says, because it is not clear what species was being studied.

January 2013. Ten endangered Borneo pygmy elephants have died in the Malaysian state of Sabah, and there is a very strong suspicion that they have been poisoned. The animals were all thought to be from the same extended family, and had all suffered internal bleeding, were found in close proximity in the Gunung Rara Forest Reserve.

Genetic methods for counting new species may be a little too good at their jobs, a new study suggests. Computer programs that rely on genetic data alone split populations of organisms into five to 13 times as many species as actually exist, researchers report online January 30 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. These overestimates may muddy researchers’ views of how species evolve and undermine conservation efforts by claiming protections for species that don’t really exist, say computational evolutionary biologist Jeet Sukumaran and evolutionary biologist L. Lacey Knowles. The lesson, says Knowles, “is that we shouldn’t use genetic data alone” to draw lines between species: here.

6 thoughts on “DNA research finds new animal species

  1. Pingback: Good African elephant news | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  2. Pingback: From dinosaurs to birds, new theory | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: From dinosaur age mammal to human, new research | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: African porcupine outwits seven lions | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Acacia trees, ants, giraffes in African ecosystems | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.