Bush’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ in Iraq, figures

Bush's mission accomplished, cartoon

Talking about Bush’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ … here’s from Think Progress blog in the USA:

‘Mission Accomplished’ By The Numbers

On May 1, 2003, President Bush stood underneath a “Mission Accomplished” banner and announced that “Major combat operations have ended. In the battle of Iraq, the United States and our allies have prevailed.”

Here’s a by-the-numbers look at the situation then, compared to the situation now:

May 1, 2003 Today

U.S. Troops Wounded 542 24,912

U.S. Troops Killed 139 3,351

Contractors Killed 69 916

Journalists and Media Assistants Killed 11 167

U.S. Forces in Iraq 150,000 146,000

Size of Iraqi Security Forces 7,000-9,000 334,300

Number of Insurgents less than 5,000 ~70,000 (Sunni only)

Insurgent Attacks Per Day 8 148.9

Cost to U.S. Taxpayers $79 billion $421 billion

Approval of Bush’s Handling of Iraq 75% 24%

Percentage of Americans who Believe The Iraq War Was “Worth Fighting” 70% 34%

Bush’s Overall Job Approval 71% 32%

General: Iraq war was lost.

24 thoughts on “Bush’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ in Iraq, figures

  1. Troops Out Now Coalition




    Warning: Don’t let the Democratic Party leadership and the ’08 Presidential Election veto the antiwar movement.

    President Bush’s veto of the Democratic Party’s bill containing a non-binding timetable for withdrawal of troops from Iraq displayed once again the Administration’s absolute contempt for the will of the people, who are now overwhelmingly in favor of ending the occupation.

    But more ominous than Bush’s inevitable veto of the war funding bill is the prospect of the leadership of the Democratic Party “vetoing” and derailing the anti-war movement by pretending to be against the war while continuing to support it with billions of dollars of more war funding.

    The Democratic Party was elected to control of the House and Senate with a mandate to end the war. As pressure grew from the antiwar movement for the Democrats to cut off the funding and withdraw the troops immediately, they turned to a desperate act of political theater in a an attempt to change the subject, attaching their support for continued funding for the war to a non-binding timetable for withdrawal from Iraq.

    The Democratic Party bill, even if not vetoed, would not have required the withdrawal of a single soldier from Iraq. The bill allowed Bush to exempt entire categories of troops at his discretion, including: troops “training the Iraqi military;” troops engaged in “special operations”; and troops “protecting diplomatic enclaves” including the U.S. Embassy and the Green Zone. This means that Bush could maintain current troop levels in Iraq and still be in compliance with the Democrats’ bill.

    Furthermore, even if Bush agreed to observe withdrawal dates that the Democrats suggested, it would mean that this criminal, colonial war would go on for at least another year and a half. Another year of Iraqi civilians and U.S. soldiers dying; Another year of Abu-Ghraib style torture. Another year of a criminal occupation.

    Actually the truth of this “antiwar” charade is even worse. Everybody knew all the time that Congress would put on an antiwar show, and after Bush vetoed the bill containing non-binding withdrawal timetables, they would then give Bush the war funding. Leading Democrats announced months ago that they had absolutely no intention of cutting off the funding for the war.

    By pretending to fight Bush on the war, Congress is hoping to neutralize the growing movement demanding the immediate end to this criminal war and occupation. Democrats in Congress hope that by hiding behind non-binding resolutions, imaginary timetables, and other acts of political theater they will send the message to those of us who have marched and organized to end the war that we don’t need to march and mobilize anymore, because the real struggle against the war is now in Congress.

    Part of this message is that, instead of taking to the streets to demand that Congress cut of all war funds and bring the troops home now, we should instead come in off the streets and sign up to support whoever the Democratic Party’s presidential candidate is in 2008. We must never again allow the antiwar movement to be co-opted, misled, and demobilized in the name of Presidential politics or the agenda of either major political Party.

    Let’s make sure to stay in the streets, continue to demand that Congress cut of all war funding, stay focused on the demand for immediate withdrawal of all troops, and stay independent of both the Democrats and the Republicans who share responsibility for the war.

    Only the people will stop this criminal war. Tomorrow, antiwar groups across the U.S. have called for demonstrations against Bush’s veto. We urge you to take part in these demonstrations and demand that the troops be brought home now — no phony timetables, no more political theater, no waiting for after the 2008 Presidential elections — now!

    In New York City:
    Times Sq. Wednesday 5:00 pm
    World Can’t Wait is calling on everyone to gather in front of Times Square’s military recruiting center–43rd and Broadway–at 5pm WEDNESDAY to demand an immediate end to the Iraq war and impeachment of the Bush Regime for war crimes.

    * Sign up for Troops Out Now updates – http://troopsoutnow.org/updatesform.shtml

    * Contact Us – http://troopsoutnow.org/cmnt.shtml


  2. Pingback: USA: Harlan K. Ullman, from Shock and Awe in Baghdad to the Washington madam’s brothel | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: Bush commutes prison sentence of convicted perjurer and Iraq war conspirator I. Lewis Libby | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Iraqi Women Face Increased Violence in Kurdistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Another French soldier dies in Mali | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Cameron’s ‘Mission Accomplished’ gaffe, like Bush | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: USA: cockroaches welcome at Walter Reed, pro peace singer Joan Baez not | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Bloodbath in Iraq because of British arms sales | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Bush’s 2003 Iraq invasion caused 2014 bloodshed, general says | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Tony Blair runs, but can’t hide, from responsibility for present Iraq bloodbath | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: More criminals in US armed forces as standards lower in Iraq war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: More U.S. Army recruits with criminal records | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: US actor Sean Penn wants Bush jailed for Iraq war lies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Iraq at war, new film | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: United States Republican candidates and wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Ex-Abu Ghraib torture prison interrogator speaks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: The Arab world, from Bush’s Iraq war to ISIS | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Picasso’s Guernica, Iraq war and jazz music | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Corporate media and fake news | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Trump attacks Syria, news update | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: USA: Fox News silent on Iraq war now when ‘Mission Accomplished’ proves untrue | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Artist makes Bush portrait from porn magazines | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: New cartoon animation as Brown replaces Blair in the UK | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: British plan to get troops out of Iraq | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.