Bridge between India and Sri Lanka, and squirrels


Five-striped palm squirrels

From a story in The Times of London, on Adam’s Bridge, or Ram Sethu, shoals between India and Sri Lanka, and religious and environmental objections against dredging there, a Hindu explanation on how palm squirrels got their stripes while said to be helping to build the bridge:

Tiny palm squirrels help by carrying pebbles to the waters edge and Rama, touched by their efforts, stroked one, marking it with the stripes — hence giving the five-striped palm squirrels their name

According to Kumaran Sathavisam, and to Wikipedia, however, the five-striped palm squirrel is a northern India species, not naturally occurring further south than central India.

Update on Ram Sethu controversy, 17 October 2007: here.

Vancouver island marmot: here.

4 thoughts on “Bridge between India and Sri Lanka, and squirrels

  1. India to push ship lane plan despite Hindu protests
    Wed May 16, 2007 9:46AM EDT

    NEW DELHI (Reuters) – India plans to go ahead with a controversial project to carve a shipping channel in seas off its south coast despite protests by religious groups who say it will destroy a mythical bridge of sand made by a Hindu god.

    The $560-million Sethusamudram Ship Canal Project will dredge a channel in a narrow strip of sea between India and Sri Lanka, reducing distances and cutting costs for freight traffic.

    But religious groups and opposition politicians have called on the government to stop the project, saying it will demolish a bridge of sand linking India and Sri Lanka which was built by Lord Ram, a Hindu god.

    Indian shipping minister T.R. Baalu told parliament that the Ram Sethu bridge, also referred to as Adam’s Bridge, was not man-made and therefore could not be considered an important religious or cultural heritage.

    “As far as the Indian map is considered, there is no Ram Sethu at all. It is purely mythical,” said Baalu. “We have never intended to hurt the religious sentiments of any religious community including the Hindus.”

    Research had shown that the bridge was a series of sand shoals created by sedimentation, he said.

    Dredging for the project began in 2005 and the channel — 12 meters (40 ft) deep, 300 meters (985 ft) wide and almost 90 km (55 miles) long — will cut through the Ram Sethu bridge and link the Palk Bay with the Gulf of Mannar.

    When the project is finished, ships sailing between India’s western and eastern coasts will no longer have to go around the south of Sri Lanka, and are expected to save up to 36 hours of sailing time.

    The project has also sparked protests by other groups including conservationists and local fishermen who say the dredging will mean dumping sediment in deeper water further out to sea.

    This and increased freight traffic will harm marine life and threaten the livelihood of thousands of fishermen in both countries, opponents say.

    © Reuters 2007. All rights reserved.

    Like

  2. ‘No archaeologist has worked on the Ram Sethu’

    Archaeologist Dr T Satyamurthy

    Related Articles
    • Complete coverage: Controversy over Ram Sethu

    October 11, 2007

    In a continuing series on the Sethusamudram Shipping Canal Project, we interview an archaeologist for his views.

    We had earlier interviewed world-renowned tsunami expert Dr Tad S Murty and Dr Kalyanaraman, a researcher on the subject, geologist Dr V Badrinarayanan and mariner H Balakrishnan.

    Before retiring as the Superintendent Archaeologist of the Chennai region, Archaeological Survey of India, Dr T Satyamurthy was the Director of Archaeology, government of Kerala [Images]. He spoke to Shobha Warrier.

    The ASI affidavit to the Supreme Court said the Rama Sethu was not a man-made structure. As an archaeologist, do you agree with the affidavit?

    I don’t know the details of the affidavit as I have not seen it. To my knowledge, no archaeologist has worked there. The National Institute of Ocean Technology has done some underwater work. (Dr Badrinarayanan spoke about that work in his interview to rediff.com). But we have not done any work there.

    You mean the archaeological department has not done any excavation work at the site?

    So far, they have not done any work there. Some other reports prepared by others are available. Maybe ASI has based their affidavit on them. So, it may not be directly from our source but from some other source they might have gathered information. Without any base, they (ASI) would not have told the Supreme Court whatever they have said.

    As an archaeologist, how do you describe Rama Sethu?

    At present, I will not say anything but I feel the structure has to be thoroughly re-examined. It is true that some alignment is there. Earlier writers like Pliny in 100 AD had described the pathway in his writings. According to Pliny’s description, the water is shallow and the reef is visible. He says there is deep sea in between.

    Portuguese and Dutch writers also have written that it was not possible to navigate that way because of the pathway.

    In one of your essays, you have written that Romans made use of the pathway to trade with Ceylon (Sri Lanka [Images]) from the 1st to 3rd century.

    Yes. In the earlier days, Romans could not come round Cape Comerin to come to east coast. They came via the west coast by land or if they were coming by sea, they had to go to some of the south East Asian countries and then come back. They could not come round because of the Sethu. This has been proved by the evidence collected by coins. Roman coins show that early trade was only through South East Asian countries, and not through the Gulf.

    Whatever we find in the Mannar region in Sri Lanka is available in Thirunelveli also, and that shows there was trade between Ceylon and India. The trade was possible only because of the Sethu.

    Roman and even Sangam age coins can be found in both places separated by the Sethu.

    A study conducted by S K Sitramabalam of Sri Lanka found striking similarity between the urn burial site of Pomparippu, south of Mannar and such sites in Madurai, Thirunelveli etc. This shows there are a lot of cultural similarities between Ceylon and South India.

    How is it that even during the Iron Age, there was cultural oneness between Sri Lanka and south of India?

    That is because of the shallowness of water in the Gulf of Mannar region only. The movement between these two countries was not a problem. That is why during the Iron Age to Megalithic period to pre-historic period to even the Chola period, there is no difference between these two regions culturally.

    Whatever materials you find here in Thirunelveli, Adityanallur, etc, you find in Poomparippu in Sri Lanka also. All that is connected with the culture of the Chola period is seen there in Sri Lanka.

    It signifies that even in Iron Age and early Historic age, there was movement and that is why there is cultural oneness between Sri Lanka and the south part of India.

    You have mentioned about the two temples on either side of the strait; a Rama temple in south India and on the Sri Lankan side, a temple for Mandodari, the wife of Ravana. What do these temples signify?

    According to Sri Lanka tradition, Mannar is Mandodari’s place. Here in Rameswaram, there is a temple for Lord Rama. According to Valmiki Ramayana also, there is a place called Aadi Sethu in Kodikal and it is believed that Rama wanted to build the bridge there. He found the nautical miles too long from there. Valmiki Ramayana says that when somebody suggested the Mannar area, he came and built the bridge there.

    In history, how far can we go back and see references of Rama Sethu?

    As far. 2,500 years before Christ. This we can decipher from the writings of Pliny and others. In the Greek writings also, you see mention of the pathway between India and Sri Lanka.

    But to prove archaeologically, you have to do studies there. You can make a horizontal digging and find out.

    Why were no archaeological excavations done in the area?

    Archaeological excavations in the independent India are done only if there is a problem over there. We don’t go and dig anywhere.

    Do you feel it is worth doing some underwater archaeological studies there?

    It is worth doing studies both underwater and onshore also.

    ASI had done a lot of excavations in Dwaraka to find out about temples.

    That was also a problem oriented survey. That was done when S R Rao found some temples below the present level of the Dwaraka temple. So, he doubted it and did the project. Nobody has undertaken a similar project here. Now, it is the right time (to do so).

    How long does it take for a proper study to be conducted in the area?

    It will take only six months to do a study. It is not very difficult.

    Have the Sri Lankan authorities done any study?

    In the last 25-30 years, research work has been completely hampered. So, they are also unable to comment.

    http://in.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/11inter.htm

    Like

  3. Hindu Groups Demand Recall of Monkey God Plush Toy

    India Post , Posted: Feb 20, 2010

    NEW YORK — Some Hindu activists are demanding that a plush toy based on the Hindu god, Hanuman, be withdrawn, reports India Post.

    Kridana, a Pennsylvania-based company, specializes in toys based on Hindu epics. Rajan Zed, a Nevada-based priest and president of the Universal Society of Hinduism, said that it would send an erroneous message to children that they could control Hanuman and other deities.

    Hanuman, the son of the wind god, is worshipped all over India and is widely recognized as the monkey god because he has the form of a monkey. Bhavna Shinde of the Forum for Hindu Awakening called on Kridana to stay true to the scriptures and show respect to the deities. Shinde stressed Hanuman is meant to be worshipped in shrines not thrown around on the floor or used as a ball or pillow.

    Kridana describes “Hanuman plush” as “squeezably soft” and “super-cuddly” and says its toys connects children to “millennia of tradition and culture.”

    Like

  4. Pingback: Indian court re-activates British colonial anti-LGBTQ law | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.