Rubens, Rembrandt, differences in what they painted


Rubens, The rape of Europa

Today, an exhibition in The Hague, called After Neurath: Like sailors on the open sea.

It is about the Austrian philosopher Otto Neurath, an influence on twentieth century artists including Gerd Arntz.

Gerd Arntz and his colleagues made influential visual statistics and icons, including simple human figures on traffic lights, toilet doors, etc.

At this exhibition, one exhibit made a visual statistic comparison between the paintings of Rubens and Rembrandt.

Rembrandt admired the older Rubens, and bought a painting by him.

Both Rembrandt and Rubens are often seen as baroque painters, influenced by earlier Italian examples.

They spoke the same language, Dutch, and lived in what was still seen as the seventeen united provinces of the Low Countries.

With both the bourgeois republicans who in Rembrandt’s and Rubens‘ days ruled the north, and the Habsburg monarchs who ruled the south, at least initially still hoping to unite all seventeen provinces under their own rule.

Nevertheless, the statistics of the various categories of subjects in Rubens’ and Rembrandt’s artistic productions show significant differences between the two artists.

Differences in artistic views between two individuals, doubtlessly.

But also differences showing how different socially and politically Rubens’ South and Rembrandt’s North had become since the Dutch revolt against the Roman Catholic Spanish absolute monarchy had started in the 1560s.

This video is called The Night Watch by Rembrandt van Rijn (Part I).

And here is Part II.

I unfortunately cannot reproduce the icons in the The Hague exhibit for the different categories of paintings here.

However, these are the figures; percent of total works by Rubens and Rembrandt:

Altar paintings: Rubens 15%, Rembrandt 0%

Biblical paintings, not commissioned by a church: Rubens 20%, Rembrandt 20%

Antique mythology and history: Rubens 40%, Rembrandt 5%

Portraits: Rubens 15%, Rembrandt 60%

Self-portraits: Rubens 0%, Rembrandt 10%

Scenes from daily life and landscapes: Rubens 10%, Rembrandt 5%

While Rubens was originally from a Protestant, rebel, and refugee Antwerp family, and made his peace with the Roman Catholic Church and the monarchy later, Rembrandt’s views are closer to the republican Dutch revolt.

The figures show that Rembrandt, contrary to Rubens, made zero altar paintings.

In the northern low countries, the newly established Protestant church did not commission them.

Neither did the Roman Catholic church, now on the margins of legality.

If we put both Christian religious categories together, 20% of Rembrandt’s paintings fitted in the “Christian” category, vs. 35% of Rubens’.

Rembrandt himself was not an official member of any church, and was free to do that in “tolerant” Amsterdam.

The Bible was interesting to him as a source of subjects, but over all, religion did not play as big a role in his work as in Rubens’.

Rembrandt painted far less historical and mythological paintings than Rubens.

In countries other than the Dutch Republic, these types of paintings often made complimentary allusions to contemporary princes and nobles, and/or were often commissioned by them.

In The Netherlands, there was no monarchical court comparable to this.

There was only the Stadhouder‘s court.

Which would have liked very much to be a princely court like elsewhere in Europe; but constitutionally wasn’t.

Rembrandt got a commission from the princely court (princely, as the Stadhouders were also absolute monarchs in the tiny statelet of Orange in southern France).

But when his portrait of Princess Amalia von Solms turned out to be not flattering enough, his relationship to that court deteriorated.

However, if compared to Rubens, Rembrandt did paint many more portraits.

Not commissioned by princes or nobles, but by the newly emerged bourgeoisie. Dutch art historian Bert Biemans who studied the economic side of seventeenth-century Dutch art, estimates that a million paintings were painted then in the Netherlands. Many, compared to other countries then. As the Dutch bourgeoisie who might buy art bought comparatively more than mainly upper-class people in other countries.

That Rembrandt painted so many more portraits than Rubens may be a sign of a stronger bourgeoisie; and of stronger individualism in the northern low countries.

So may be the fact that Rubens did not paint any self-portrait, while Rembrandt painted many; though there are various theories on Rembrandt’s self-portraits.

As for scenes from daily life, and landscapes, lumped together here as relatively small categories for both painters: this may show Rubens, and especially Rembrandt, as painters, different from their contemporaries.

Both types of paintings were popular in the Dutch bourgeois art market, and many painters specialized in them.

Including, eg, Jan Steen in genre painting.

Landscape painting may have become popular, as the Dutch Republic was one of the most densely populated and, pre-machine, industrialized areas of Europe, creating a market for painted idyllic counterweights.

Some Dutch seventeenth-century landscape painters specialized in special types of landscapes, like frozen canals and rivers in winter.

Though Rembrandt was born close to the Rhine river, where, as we know from other painters, in many winters, usually more severe in the seventeenth century than now, many citizens of Leiden came for skating, he seems to not have liked winter and skating.

As of all his paintings, only one is a winter scene.

There are still some 1500 Rubens paintings left, vs. 300 by Rembrandt and 36 by Vermeer. That is because Rubens had a workshop where many pupils did much of the painting.

On Rembrandt, John Berger, and Hadjinicolau: here.

Pierre Bourdieu and art: here.

Rubens’ imposing art couldn’t dazzle Europe’s Reformation. The Royal Academy is hosting an exhibition on Peter Paul Rubens. His art celebrated wealth and power in the face of Reformation, argues Noel Halifax: here.

98 thoughts on “Rubens, Rembrandt, differences in what they painted

  1. Leiden koopt eerste Rembrandt

    Update: vrijdag 17 feb 2012, 12:04

    De gemeente Leiden en het Leidse Museum De Lakenhal hebben het vroegst bekende schilderij van Rembrandt van Rijn aangekocht. Rembrandt schilderde De Brillenverkoper in 1624. Met de koop komt er voor het eerst een Rembrandt in het bezit van zijn geboortstad Leiden. Hij maakte het doek toen hij 17 was.

    De Brillenverkoper maakt deel uit van vijf paneeltjes, met de vijf zintuigen als onderwerp. Van de drie overgebleven werken bevinden zich er twee in New York in particulier bezit.

    Het paneel over zicht hing al zes jaar in bruikleen in De Lakenhal. De prijs van het schilderij is onbekend.

    Dit artikel is afkomstig van Teletekst.

    See also

    http://nos.nl/artikel/342053-lakenhal-koopt-rembrandt-aan.html

    Like

  2. Pingback: Resistance and art, from the 1871 Paris Commune to today’s Iraq war. Part II | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: New Rembrandt painting discovered in Rotterdam | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Rembrandt night in artist’s city of birth | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: Rubens out of museum for money? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Spinoza and John Berger | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: Dutch antiquities museum on the Internet | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Anton Mauve, painting and social background | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: French painter Manet London exhibition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: New documents about Rembrandt discovered | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: Australia: Batavia ship from the same oak as Rembrandt’s and Rubens’ painters’ panels | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: Rembrandt’s birthday celebrated | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Rembrandt’s birthday and music | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Amsterdam Rijksmuseum reopened, Rembrandt and owl | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Common tern and famous painter, video | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Tazein! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Women artists’ history | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Van Gogh exhibition in London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Horty! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Which blog posts attracted most visits in 2013? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: London landscape paintings exhibition | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: Peter Paul Rubens and Baroque. Interview with artist Michael Bell » Yareah Magazine

  23. Pingback: Cracking Chrispmouse Bloggywod Award, thanks dear Horty! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Sunshine Award, thank you Afsheen Anjum! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Mahesh Nair! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Cosmos, science and media from Carl Sagan to today | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  27. Pingback: Over 100,000 comments on my blog, and other statistics | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  28. Pingback: Pre-Biblical Adam and Eve story discovery | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  29. Pingback: Portuguese-Jewish-Dutch philosopher Spinoza | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  30. Pingback: Sisterhood of the World Bloggers Award, thanks Afsheen! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  31. Pingback: Reader Appreciation Award, thank you so much Horty! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  32. Pingback: Dutch seventeenth century painting and foreign authors | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  33. Pingback: Liebster Award, thanks Juliana Mare! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  34. Pingback: 500,000 visits milestone on this blog, thanks! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  35. Pingback: Music, poetry, and a magician in the theater | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  36. Pingback: Ancient Greek and Roman graves | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  37. Pingback: Record number of visits to my blog this October | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  38. Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Barbara! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  39. Pingback: Liebster Award, thanks stellingsma2010! | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  40. Pingback: Rembrandt exhibition in London | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  41. Pingback: London National Gallery, new film reviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  42. Pingback: Rembrandt, new Internet site | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  43. Pingback: Seventeenth-century Dutch paintings exhibited in Boston, USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  44. Pingback: Dutch museum acquires portrait of 17th century princess | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  45. Pingback: J.M.W. Turner art exhibition in Canada | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  46. Pingback: Painter Rubens’ mother’s testament discovered in Belgium | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  47. Pingback: Rembrandt self-portrait exhibition in England | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.