Today, an exhibition in The Hague, called After Neurath: Like sailors on the open sea.
It is about the Austrian philosopher Otto Neurath, an influence on twentieth century artists including Gerd Arntz.
Gerd Arntz and his colleagues made influential visual statistics and icons, including simple human figures on traffic lights, toilet doors, etc.
At this exhibition, one exhibit made a visual statistic comparison between the paintings of Rubens and Rembrandt.
Rembrandt admired the older Rubens, and bought a painting by him.
Both Rembrandt and Rubens are often seen as baroque painters, influenced by earlier Italian examples.
They spoke the same language, Dutch, and lived in what was still seen as the seventeen united provinces of the Low Countries.
With both the bourgeois republicans who in Rembrandt’s and Rubens‘ days ruled the north, and the Habsburg monarchs who ruled the south, at least initially still hoping to unite all seventeen provinces under their own rule.
Nevertheless, the statistics of the various categories of subjects in Rubens’ and Rembrandt’s artistic productions show significant differences between the two artists.
Differences in artistic views between two individuals, doubtlessly.
But also differences showing how different socially and politically Rubens’ South and Rembrandt’s North had become since the Dutch revolt against the Roman Catholic Spanish absolute monarchy had started in the 1560s.
This video is called The Night Watch by Rembrandt van Rijn (Part I).
And here is Part II.
I unfortunately cannot reproduce the icons in the The Hague exhibit for the different categories of paintings here.
However, these are the figures; percent of total works by Rubens and Rembrandt:
Altar paintings: Rubens 15%, Rembrandt 0%
Biblical paintings, not commissioned by a church: Rubens 20%, Rembrandt 20%
Antique mythology and history: Rubens 40%, Rembrandt 5%
Portraits: Rubens 15%, Rembrandt 60%
Self-portraits: Rubens 0%, Rembrandt 10%
Scenes from daily life and landscapes: Rubens 10%, Rembrandt 5%
While Rubens was originally from a Protestant, rebel, and refugee Antwerp family, and made his peace with the Roman Catholic Church and the monarchy later, Rembrandt’s views are closer to the republican Dutch revolt.
The figures show that Rembrandt, contrary to Rubens, made zero altar paintings.
In the northern low countries, the newly established Protestant church did not commission them.
Neither did the Roman Catholic church, now on the margins of legality.
If we put both Christian religious categories together, 20% of Rembrandt’s paintings fitted in the “Christian” category, vs. 35% of Rubens’.
Rembrandt himself was not an official member of any church, and was free to do that in “tolerant” Amsterdam.
The Bible was interesting to him as a source of subjects, but over all, religion did not play as big a role in his work as in Rubens’.
Rembrandt painted far less historical and mythological paintings than Rubens.
In countries other than the Dutch Republic, these types of paintings often made complimentary allusions to contemporary princes and nobles, and/or were often commissioned by them.
In The Netherlands, there was no monarchical court comparable to this.
There was only the Stadhouder‘s court.
Which would have liked very much to be a princely court like elsewhere in Europe; but constitutionally wasn’t.
Rembrandt got a commission from the princely court (princely, as the Stadhouders were also absolute monarchs in the tiny statelet of Orange in southern France).
But when his portrait of Princess Amalia von Solms turned out to be not flattering enough, his relationship to that court deteriorated.
However, if compared to Rubens, Rembrandt did paint many more portraits.
Not commissioned by princes or nobles, but by the newly emerged bourgeoisie. Dutch art historian Bert Biemans who studied the economic side of seventeenth-century Dutch art, estimates that a million paintings were painted then in the Netherlands. Many, compared to other countries then. As the Dutch bourgeoisie who might buy art bought comparatively more than mainly upper-class people in other countries.
That Rembrandt painted so many more portraits than Rubens may be a sign of a stronger bourgeoisie; and of stronger individualism in the northern low countries.
So may be the fact that Rubens did not paint any self-portrait, while Rembrandt painted many; though there are various theories on Rembrandt’s self-portraits.
As for scenes from daily life, and landscapes, lumped together here as relatively small categories for both painters: this may show Rubens, and especially Rembrandt, as painters, different from their contemporaries.
Both types of paintings were popular in the Dutch bourgeois art market, and many painters specialized in them.
Including, eg, Jan Steen in genre painting.
Landscape painting may have become popular, as the Dutch Republic was one of the most densely populated and, pre-machine, industrialized areas of Europe, creating a market for painted idyllic counterweights.
Some Dutch seventeenth-century landscape painters specialized in special types of landscapes, like frozen canals and rivers in winter.
Though Rembrandt was born close to the Rhine river, where, as we know from other painters, in many winters, usually more severe in the seventeenth century than now, many citizens of Leiden came for skating, he seems to not have liked winter and skating.
As of all his paintings, only one is a winter scene.
There are still some 1500 Rubens paintings left, vs. 300 by Rembrandt and 36 by Vermeer. That is because Rubens had a workshop where many pupils did much of the painting.
On Rembrandt, John Berger, and Hadjinicolau: here.
Pierre Bourdieu and art: here.
Rubens’ imposing art couldn’t dazzle Europe’s Reformation. The Royal Academy is hosting an exhibition on Peter Paul Rubens. His art celebrated wealth and power in the face of Reformation, argues Noel Halifax: here.
- Art Lovers Rejoice! New Goya and Rembrandt Databases Now Online (openculture.com)
- The Rijksmuseum Puts 125,000 Dutch Masterpieces Online, and Lets You Remix Its Art (openculture.com)
- Dutch antiquities museum on the Internet (dearkitty1.wordpress.com)
- The Transcendent Technique of Etching, from Rembrandt to Nanoscience (forbes.com)
- Rothko vandalism: why are the greatest works attacked? (guardian.co.uk)
Pingback: Caravaggio, Schalcken paintings rediscovered (?) | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: After Dutch museum, Ukrainian criminals rob Italian museum | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Painter Jan Brueghel and birds | Dear Kitty. Some blog
A lot of great material, it was an excellent read and I enjoyed the knowledge you passed on. I hope that you have a great weekend.
Thanks for your kind words and your reblogs! I wish you a great weekend as well 🙂
Reblogged this on Truth Troubles: Why people hate the truths' of the real world and commented:
This is a very good article filled with excellent history knowledge and several excellent pictures.
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks marjma2014! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thank you Erika! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks reasonably liberal! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Real birds in Hieronymus Bosch’s fantastic paintings | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Ancient Egyptian emoticons | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: New Hercules Segers paintings discovered | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Cosmic Explorer! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Painter Leonardo da Vinci, new film, review | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Lucie! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Million visits milestone, my most visited blog posts | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Blog-aholic Award, thanks Quixote’s Kid! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Blog-aholic Award, thanks Quixote’s Kid and Dear Kitty! – Schwein gehabt?
Pingback: Rembrandt exhibition on film | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Mystery Blogger Award, thanks Dolly! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Rembrandt’s drawings online | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Rubens painting rediscovered after centuries | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Van Gogh, Goltzius, paintings exhibition | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: American art historian Linda Nochlin, RIP | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dear Kitty blog, 2017 overview | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Painter Vermeer, film reviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Real Neat Blog Award, thank you Susan! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: 17th century painting, battle re-enacted in the Netherlands | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Siddarth! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: English King Charles I, art and revolution | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Facebook censors painter Rubens, not nazism | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Painter Rubens’ partial victory against Facebook censorship | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Er. Mukhtar Zahid! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Liebster Award, thanks so much Emilia! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Most popular posts on this blog in 2018 | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Mystery Blogger Award, thank you Yaasotaa! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Very Inspiring Blogger Award, thank you nikkif181! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Rubens sketch discovered | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Painter Frans Hals exhibition in the USA | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Liebster Award, thanks Isolated_girl! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dragon’s Loyalty Award, thanks unbolt and Sam! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Versatile Blogger Award, thanks Paul! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Lakenhal museum, Lucas van Leyden, Rembrandt, Wolkers | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Mystery Blogger Award, thank you showdonttell! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Which posts attracted 2019 Dear Kitty visitors? | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Young Rembrandt exhibition in his birthplace | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Rembrandt’s paintings, money and new film reviewed | Dear Kitty. Some blog