Afghans illegally imprisoned by British forces


This video from the USA is called Americas Secret Afghan Prisons: Investigation Unearths New US Torture Site in Afghanistan 1 of 2.

This video is called Americas Secret Afghan Prisons: Investigation Unearths New US Torture Site in Afghanistan 2 of 2.

From the BBC:

29 May 2013 Last updated at 04:00 GMT

Afghans ‘unlawfully held’ by UK forces at Camp Bastion

By Dominic Casciani and Clive Coleman, BBC news

British forces are detaining up to 85 Afghan nationals in a holding facility at Camp Bastion, in what could amount to unlawful detention and internment, documents obtained by the BBC suggest.

UK lawyers acting for eight of the men said their clients had been held for up to 14 months without charge.

They compared it to when the public became aware of Guantanamo Bay and want the UK High Court to free them.

Camp Bastion in Helmand province is the largest British military base in Afghanistan, housing nearly 30,000 servicemen and women.

Legal documents seen by the BBC suggest that an estimated 85 suspected insurgents are being held at the base in a temporary holding facility.

‘Exceptional circumstances’

British forces in Afghanistan, operating as part of the International Security Assistance Force (Isaf), are allowed to detain suspects for 96 hours.

However, in “exceptional circumstances” – for example, to gather critical intelligence to protect lives – they can hold them for longer periods.

The Ministry of Defence has previously said that Isaf neither has the power nor the facilities to intern detainees in Afghanistan.

But nor can the British pass them to the Afghan authorities, after Defence Secretary Philip Hammond imposed a ban on handing over suspects to Afghan forces last November because of fears over ill-treatment.

UK lawyers acting for eight of the men said their clients were arrested by British soldiers in raids in villages in Helmand and Kandahar provinces and have been held for between eight and 14 months without charge.

They claimed it amounted to unlawful detention and internment.

Lawyers for the men, whom the BBC has chosen not to name over fears for their safety, launched habeas corpus applications at the High Court in London on 18 April, with a full hearing due in late July.

Habeas corpus, in this context, argues for the right to be brought before a court to determine whether their detainment is lawful or not.

The lawyers argue that the MoD should release the men because the British army has no power to continue holding them.

‘Perfect storm’

A senior government lawyer, James Eadie QC, described this situation in court as a “perfect legal storm” because the Army suspects each detainee of links to insurgents.

The families of two of the men who appear to have been held the longest said they were arrested in spring last year and interrogated in the weeks that followed.

But legal papers state their interrogation ended “many months ago”.

Last week, the two were allowed access to lawyers but they have still not been told why they are being held and they have not been charged with any crime.

The families only established where the men were being held with the help of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

One, a teenager, has been held for 14 months, while the other, a 20-year-old father, has been held for 12 months.

In legal papers Dan Squires, a barrister for the 20-year-old, told the High Court: “He has not been granted access to lawyer nor brought before a court.

“He does not know how long he is to remain detained or for what purpose. He has asked whether he will be transferred to Afghan authorities but had been told they do not consider that he has committed any criminal offence and so do not want to receive him.”

‘Suspected killers’

In preparatory legal arguments at the High Court on 22 April, Mr Justice Collins told the government that the case raised serious questions about the British army’s power to hold suspects in Afghanistan, because the UK could not operate a Guantanamo Bay-style prison – referring to the US facility in which enemy combatants can be held indefinitely without trial.

UK forces operate in Afghanistan as members of Isaf.

Isaf was established by a UN Security Council resolution which “authorises the member states participating in Isaf to take all necessary measures to fulfil its mandate”.

The Security Council resolution does not include a power to intern detainees on the basis that they are regarded as a threat to national security or otherwise.

Detention procedures

Phil Shiner, lawyer for eight of the men, said: “This is a secret facility that’s been used to unlawfully detain or intern up to 85 Afghans that they’ve kept secret, that Parliament doesn’t know about, that courts previously when they have interrogated issues like detention and internment in Afghanistan have never been told about – completely off the radar.

“It is reminiscent of the public’s awakening that there was a Guantanamo Bay. And people will be wondering if these detainees are being treated humanely and in accordance with international law.”

See also here.

20 percent of Afghan children never reach the age of five: here.

Mosque opens doors after fascist threats


This video from Britain is called EDL nazis.

From daily The Morning Star in Britain:

Mosque fights racist threat by throwing open doors

Monday 27 May 2013

A Yorkshire mosque has responded to racist threats by throwing open its doors and inviting in the public, writes Peter Lazenby.

The mosque in Bull Lane, York, learned that fascist English Defence League (EDL) thugs planned to target it following the murder of off-duty soldier Lee Rigby in Woolwich by two self-proclaimed “jihadists.”

Muslims across Britain were among those who condemned the killing, but the soldier’s death has been exploited by the EDL, British National Party, National Front and other fanatics to attack mosques, make racist attacks and fight with police.

When users of the York mosque heard of the EDL threats they decided to stage an open day.

Around 100 local people responded, dwarfing a tiny gathering of EDL supporters nearby.

Mosque elder and York University Professor Mohamed El-Gomati said: “Rather than have a shouting match outside we invited people in to have a discussion and show solidarity over a cup of tea with us.”

See also here.

Illegal British badger killing threatens


This is a video about young badgers in the Netherlands.

From daily The Guardian in Britain:

Culls risk illegally exterminating badgers, animal expert warns

Campaigners for badgers are mobilising to disrupt night-time shoots, as the 1 June start date approaches

England’s highly controversial badger culls risk illegally wiping out every badger in the cull zones because the animals‘ numbers are so poorly known, according to one of the UK’s leading badger experts.

The culls, intended to curb tuberculosis in cattle, are authorised to begin on 1 June but could prove unworkable because of the uncertainty over badger numbers, said Prof Rosie Woodroffe, at the Zoological Society of London.

The government is determined to have an impact on the disease which in 2012 meant that more than 37,000 cattle had to be slaughtered at a cost to the taxpayer of £100m. But the costs of carrying out and policing the culls will mount as animal rights campaigners mobilise to disrupt the night-time shoots and last-minute legal challenges loom.

The two pilot culls in Gloucestershire and Somerset were postponed in October after farmers’ low estimates of badger numbers were rejected in favour of higher government numbers. Now the population estimates have been reduced again, after further government study.

Sources have told the Guardian that David Cameron has made clear to the environment secretary, Owen Paterson, that another U-turn on the culls is unacceptable and that Paterson’s job is at stake. An insider said that key officials in the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) are “pale with worry”.

Paterson has remained steadfast on the cull and told the Sunday Times that it could run for decades: “We want to reduce the incidence of disease to less than 0.2% of herds a year. It will take 20-25 years of hard culling to get to that.”

Woodroffe said: “The difficulty of counting badgers is the Achilles heel of the policy.” Woodroffe was a key member of the team that spent a decade and £50m culling 11,000 badgers before concluding that culling could make “no meaningful contribution” to reducing bovine TB. She said: “Badger numbers halted the cull in October and could still be the thing which makes the cull unworkable. That is completely plausible.”

The government has approved two pilot culls to determine whether the untested method of shooting free-running badgers can kill sufficient numbers and do so safely and humanely. Killing at least 70% of badgers in a cull zone is crucial, as the previous decade-long trial showed, otherwise fleeing badgers cause TB in cattle to rise.

But, according to Woodroffe, there are serious uncertainties in the population estimates in the two cull zones. According to the government’s own figures, farmers in Gloucestershire must kill between 2,856 and 2,932 badgers, but the estimate of the population ranges much more widely, from 2,657 to 4,079. Even worse, according to Woodroffe, is that there is a 40% chance the real population lies outside even that range.

If the real population is below the minimum cull target of 2,856, farmers could kill every badger in the area – breaking the strict condition of the licence that forbids local extinctions – while simultaneously failing to kill enough badgers to satisfy the terms of that same licence. The situation is the same in Somerset, where between 2,061 and 2,162 badgers must be culled, but the population estimate ranges from 1,972 to 2,932.

The Badger Trust, which unsuccessfully attempted to stop the culling through judicial review in July 2012, is concerned about the uncertainty in badger numbers. In a letter to the government’s licensing body, Natural England, the trust’s lawyers noted that badger populations vary through the seasons and from year to year. “There has been a fatal failure to factor this into the cull targets,” their letter said. Ministers had ignored advice from own independent expert panel to repeat October’s surveys this spring. “The Badger Trust is continuing to consider its legal options,” said Jeff Hayden, a director of the trust.

The trust’s legal letter also said it was “reckless and irrational” to proceed with culling when the costs used in the government’s original cost-benefit assessment had been far exceeded. The initial assessment had concluded that the costs actually outweighed the benefits, and at least £1m of additional costs for badger surveying has been incurred since then. The Defra spokesman said: “The pilots will test our and the farming industry’s cost assumptions [and] this will inform our decision on wider roll-out of the policy.”

Activists are gearing up to disrupt the pilot culls, using vuvuzelas and bright torches to frighten badgers away. “Whenever it happens we’ll be ready – it’ll be like an army,” said Joe Thomas of Bristol Hunt Saboteurs. “The number of new volunteers has been astronomical and they are not your normal animal-rights people, it’s everyday, ordinary people who are preparing to help.”

Save British wildflowers


This video from Britain says about itself:

The bee orchid, Ophrys apifera | Natural History Museum

18 July 2012

Join Museum botanist Fred Rumsey as he goes in search of some wildflowers that go to extreme lengths to lure pollinating insects. He finds the bee orchid, Ophrys apifera, and its close relative the late spider orchid, Ophrys fuciflora.

By Peter Lazenby in Britain:

Councils face call to protect wildflowers

Sunday 26 May 2013

Conservation charity Plantlife laid into local councils today for destroying wildflower-rich roadside verges by mowing them when they are in full bloom.

The charity said verges and hedgerows were home to hundreds of species of flowering plants and provide food for wildlife ranging from bees to birds and mammals.

But repeated mowing when plants are flowering is destroying them and leaving them smothered by cuttings or sprayed with herbicides, said Plantlife.

The charity called on councils to manage almost 600,000 acres of roadside verges to protect native flowers and the pollinators and other wildlife that rely on them.

Plantlife said the roadside vergs on support as many as a thousand plant species across the country and were important for rare species such as long-leaved helleborine and bastard balm, which are among 33 wayside flowers threatened with extinction.

“The A30 and A38 roads in Devon and Cornwall alone support more than 1,000 acres of flower-rich grassland, with just one junction home to six orchid species including bee orchids and 1,100 greater butterfly orchids,” said Plantlife.

“In Warwickshire, one road verge has the county’s largest population of pyramidal orchids and rockrose, as well as the regionally scarce brown argus butterfly which feeds on the rockrose.

The huge loss of meadows from the UK makes roadside verges and the habitat they create even more important, with verges providing twice as much grassland as is left in the countryside.”

Plantlife said the verges should be managed in the same way meadows historically were, with a cut early in the year and another in late summer, and cuttings removed.

But three-quarters of councils surveyed by the charity cut their verges multiple times over the summer and none collected the cuttings.

Dutch orchids: here.

Suffragette Emily Davison did not intend suicide


Emily Davison, left, and jockey Herbert Jones fall to the ground after her collision with the King's horse, Anmer. Photograph: Hulton Archive

From weekly The Observer in Britain:

Truth behind the death of suffragette Emily Davison is finally revealed

Hi-tech film analysis suggests Emily Davison’s motives when she collided with the king’s horse in 1913 were misunderstood

Vanessa Thorpe

Sunday 26 May 2013

As an emblem of women’s emancipation Emily Wilding Davison has always been controversial. The suffragette who was fatally injured at the Epsom racecourse during the Derby 100 years ago under the hooves of the king’s horse has been saluted by some as a brave martyr and attacked by others as an irresponsible anarchist. Now detailed analysis of film footage of the incident has shed new light on the contentious moments on 4 June 1913 that were to go down in the history of political protest.

Despite the fact that film technology was in its early days, the incident was captured on three newsreel cameras and a new study of the images has shown that the 40-year-old campaigner was not, as assumed, attempting to pull down Anmer, the royal racehorse, but in fact reaching up to attach a scarf to its bridle.

The analysis, carried out by a team of investigators for a television documentary to be screened tonight on Channel 4, also indicates that the position of Davison before she stepped out on to the track would have given her a clear view of the oncoming race, contrary to the argument that she ran out recklessly to kill herself.

Presenter Clare Balding and investigators Stephen Cole and Mike Dixon returned to the original nitrate film stocks taken on the day and transferred them to a digital format. This was done so that they could be cleaned and so that new software could cross-reference the three different camera angles.

“It has been such an extraordinary adventure to discover more about her, about what she stood for, about the suffragette movement,” said Balding this weekend on her work with the team making Secrets of a Suffragette.

“It is hugely significant as a moment in history, a moment that absolutely sums up the desperation of women in this country who wanted the vote.”

Historians have suggested that Davison was trying to attach a flag to King George V‘s horse and police reports suggested two flags were found on her body. Some witnesses believed she was trying to cross the track, thinking the horses had passed by, others believed she had tried to pull down Anmer. The fact that she was carrying a return train ticket from Epsom and had holiday plans with her sister in the near future have also caused some historians to claim that she had no intention of killing herself.

In 2011 the horse-racing historian Michael Tanner argued that as Davison was standing in crowds on the inside of the bend at Tattenham Corner it would have been impossible for her to see the king’s horse.

But new cross-referencing between the cameras has revealed, say the C4 programme makers, that Davison was closer to the start of Tattenham Corner than thought and so had a better line of sight. In this position she could have seen and singled out Anmer.

Historians have suggested that Davison and other suffragettes were seen “practising” at grabbing horses in the park near her mother’s house and that they then drew lots to determine who should go to the Derby.

After colliding with Anmer, Davison collapsed unconscious on the track. The horse went over, but then rose, completing the race without a jockey. Davison died of her injuries four days later in Epsom Cottage Hospital.

At the funeral of the leading suffragette Emmeline Pankhurst in 1928, the jockey who had ridden Anmer that day, Herbert Jones, laid a wreath “to do honour to the memory of Mrs Pankhurst and Miss Emily Davison”. Jones had suffered a mild concussion in the 1913 collision, but afterwards claimed he was “haunted by that poor woman’s face”.

In 1951, his son found Jones dead in a gas-filled kitchen. The jockey had killed himself.

Barn swallow video


This video about barn swallows is called Two swallows don’t make a summer! British Birds Wales UK.