Iraqi receptionist tortured to death by British soldiers


The body of Baha Mousa showing some of the 93 injuries that doctor Keilloh ‘did not notice’ after being beaten by British troops

From daily News Line in Britain:

Monday, 24 December 2012

‘I WANT THE DOCTOR BANNED FOR LIFE’ says Colonel Mousa – the father of Baha Mousa

THE Medical Practitioners’ Tribunal Service (MPTS) investigating the fitness to practice of the doctor who was responsible for the welfare of Baha Mousa at the time of his death in British custody in Iraq, has announced that Dr Derek Keilloh is not fit to practice and has had his membership of the General Medical Council (GMC) erased.

He will not be allowed to practice as a Doctor for at least five years and, even then, will be required to prove to the MPTS that he is fit to resume practice before being restored.

Public Interest Lawyers (PIL) represent the father of Baha Mousa, Colonel Daoud Mousa.

PIL lodged a complaint with the GMC in 2007 on Col. Mousa’s behalf. The complaint alleged that Dr Keilloh had failed in his professional capacity to offer adequate levels of care and protection to Baha Mousa and other Iraqi civilians detained at Battle Group Main, the main base of the 1st Queen’s Lancashire Regiment (1QLR) during the UK’s occupation of South East Iraq.

Baha Mousa died after three days of vicious abuse at Battle Group Main. Dr Keilloh was the Medical Officer overseeing detainee care at the base and attempted over 20 minutes or so to resuscitate Baha Mousa.

At the public inquiry into Baha Mousa’s death, Dr Keilloh insisted that he had not noticed extensive injuries on Baha Mousa’s body whilst seeking to resuscitate him.

He claimed to have only noticed an area of dried blood at his nostrils. By contrast, the final report of the chair of the Inquiry, Sir William Gage, recorded that Baha Mousa had sustained 93 different external injuries prior to his death.

The MPTS has undertaken a lengthy investigation into Dr Keilloh’s fitness to practice. On 16 December 2012, the Panel announced which of the allegations of misconduct made against Dr Keilloh were found to be proven.

Of 51 allegations, 30 were admitted by Dr Keilloh and 17 were not admitted but were found proven by the Panel. Of those allegations proven, the following were key:

i.) That Dr Keilloh failed to conduct any, or any adequate, examination of Baha Mousa’s body after his death.

ii.) That Dr Keilloh failed to ensure that the physical condition of the other civilian detainees then held at Battlegroup Main was assessed.

iii.) That Dr Keilloh failed to take any, or any adequate, action to safeguard the well being of the civilian detainees held at Battlegroup Main.

iv.) That Dr Keilloh’s account to the Court Martial of 11 December 2006 and the Baha Mousa Public Inquiry with regards the extent of the injuries he had observed on Baha Mousa and two other injured detainees was untrue and his conduct in this regard was misleading, and these findings led the Panel to conclude that Dr Keilloh’s fitness to practice was impaired.

They announced that he would be struck from the GMC register and would not be permitted to practice as a Doctor for at least five years.

Speaking following confirmation of the Panel’s findings, Colonel Mousa stated: ‘I wanted the Doctor to be banned for life. He did not have humanity in his heart when he was supposed to be caring for my son.

‘He did not do his job properly.’

PIL welcome the Panel’s determination on sanction. It marks a welcome acknowledgment that professional, legal and moral obligations are borne by all of those in positions of power and responsibility working in conflict zones.

PIL commend the GMC for taking a strong stance on the crucial issues of professional responsibility and integrity.

With 15 months having passed since the conclusion of the Baha Mousa Inquiry, it is remarkable that only one soldier and now one doctor have faced disciplinary or criminal proceedings for what is recognised to have been the unlawful killing of a man held in British custody.

PIL hope that this case marks a new chapter in the British authorities acknowledging, and accepting responsibility for, the many crimes committed in Iraq against Iraqi civilians.

PIL notes that all of its hundreds of other Iraqi cases involving torture and ill-treatment in UK detention also involve doctors failing in basic medical standards.

Phil Shiner of Public Interest Lawyers said: ‘Baha Mousa died with appalling injuries to his face and body.

‘Dr Keilloh saw these injuries and failed to take any action to safeguard the other detainees or report what he had seen.

‘The medical profession is well rid of such a man. All those UK doctors in Iraq who also saw signs of ill-treatment of Iraqi detainees but took no action had best start to instruct lawyers.’

Meanwhile, lawyers for a Pakistani man, whose father was killed by a US drone strike, have confirmed that he is to appeal a High Court judgement, handed down on 21 December which denies him permission to continue his legal action which seeks to determine the legality of intelligence sharing in relation to GCHQ assistance in CIA drone strikes.

Noor Khan – whose father was killed in a CIA strike on a peaceful meeting in March 2011 – issued legal proceedings in March of this year against the Foreign Secretary in order to clarify the British Government’s reported policy of supporting the CIA’s covert campaign of attacks on his home region of Waziristan, using remotely-controlled robotic aircraft.

Supported by legal action charity Reprieve and solicitors Leigh Day, Mr Khan’s legal challenge asserts that this practice may be illegal.

British law suggests that in these circumstances UK intelligence staff and those who direct their actions could be committing various criminal offences, including conspiracy to murder.

Mr Khan was today denied permission to progress his case to a full hearing, but intends to appeal his case immediately.

The issue of CIA drones killing innocent civilians is also being pursued before the Peshawar High Court in Pakistan, where Chief Justice Dost Muhammad has already instructed the Pakistan government to share details of strikes, including that of March 2011, with the parties in order to determine the extent of the casualties.

The suit in the Peshawar High Court is also asking the Pakistani government to disclose their involvement – if any – in the drone strikes. The next hearing in this case is expected early next year when the Pakistani government will have to disclose the identities of those killed in the strikes.

Rosa Curling from law firm Leigh Day, who represents Mr Khan, said: ‘We are disappointed that the court has decided not to engage in this very important issue, leaving our client no option but to appeal the decision.

‘This claim raises very serious questions and issues about the UK’s involvement in the CIA drone attacks in Pakistan.

‘This case seeks to determine the legality of intelligence sharing in relation to GCHQ assistance in CIA drone strikes.

‘Those providing such information could be committing serious criminal offences, including conspiracy to murder.’

Zoo bird’s house arrest for four-letter words


This video from Pakistan says about itself:

Filmed this singing Common Myna (Acridotheres Tristis) on the window of my flat at Karachi Federal B Area. Commo Myna are native to Iran, Pakistan, India, Srilanka, Bangladesh, Kazakhstan, Malaysia, China & some other adjsent countries.

From ANI news agency:

Myna bird placed under house arrest at zoo for shouting ‘f you’ at visitors

Wednesday 19th December, 2012

A myna bird has been put in solitary confinement at a zoo after shouting ‘f you’ at visitors.

The bird had been trained to welcome people to Jiufeng Forest Zoo in Wuhan, central China, but keepers were shocked to hear it hurling abuses at tourists in recent weeks.

Staff believe the bird picked up the rude words from visitors and signs have now been put up warning zoo-goers about teaching mynas bad language, the Daily Mail reported.

A sign erected at the zoo read: “Please do not use foul language to get a rise out of the Myna.”

The common myna bird has been isolated to stop the other birds from copying the rude words.

Keepers say they will withhold food from the common myna bird when it swears and play tapes of polite words to change its bad habits.

Caretaker Li Yun said he had heard some tourists try to teach the birds such language.

He told China’s Global Times: “The bird has a good memory. It’s possible that some visitor taught it how to say these things.

“He said the birds are ‘good mimics’ and quick learners,” he added.

Ancient tombs discovery in Pakistan


This video from Pakistan is called Gandhara Civilization, Buddhist Remains Taxila.

From AFP news agency:

24 November 2012 – 08H46

Ancient tombs discovered in Pakistan‘s Swat

Italian archaeologists say they have discovered a cemetery that reveals complex funeral rites dating back more than 3,000 years in Pakistan’s Swat valley, recently controlled by the Taliban.

The Italian mission began digging in the 1950s at Udegram, a site of Buddhist treasures in Swat, the northwestern district formerly known as the Switzerland of Pakistan for its stunning mountains, valleys and rivers.

Archaeologists were aware of a pre-Buddhist grave site in Udegram, but only recently discovered the collection of almost 30 graves, tightly clustered and partially overlapping.

“Some graves had a stone wall, others were protected by walls and enclosures in beaten clay,” Luca Maria Olivieri, head of the Italian mission, told AFP.

“The cemetery… seems to have been used between the end of the second millennium BCE and the first half of the first millennium BCE,” he added.

Olivieri says the tombs point to the culture that predates the Buddhist Gandhara civilisation that took hold in northwest Pakistan and eastern Afghanistan from the first millennium BCE to the sixth century AD.

“The presence of a few iron fragments might be amongst the most ancient traces of this metal in the subcontinent,” he said.

Bodies were first laid to rest in open graves, fenced in by wooden railings. Then the graves were re-opened and the bones partially burnt before the graves were sealed and a burial mound built.

Men were buried with high quality flasks, bowls and cooking pots, and women with semi-precious beads, bronze hairpins, and spindles.

In October, the Taliban shot schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai in the head in Mingora, the main town of Swat, in a case that sparked worldwide condemnation.

She is now undergoing treatment in Birmingham, England.

Stop Pakistani civilian drone deaths


By Alyssa Figueroa, on AlterNet in the USA:

November 14, 2012

On Drone Warfare, Pakistani Man: “We Are The People Who Do Not Matter”

(L-R) Samina Sundas, Medea Benjamin, Dianne Budd and Toby Blome discuss CODEPINK's recent delegation to Pakistan
(L-R) Samina Sundas, Medea Benjamin, Dianne Budd and Toby Blome discuss CODEPINK‘s recent delegation to Pakistan.

“We are the people who do not matter; our voices cannot be heard over here,” one Pakistani man told Dianne Budd. “We are lucky for you to be here, and we want everyone to come fearlessly here.”

Budd is a member of CODEPINK, an anti-war organization that recently led a delegation of 34 activists on a trip to Pakistan in October. Last night, the organization hosted a report back in San Francisco to discuss their experiences in a country devastated by U.S. killer drones and our continued military intervention.

“People there feel so unseen and unheard,” Budd said.

This is perhaps because people haven’t made a real effort to see or hear them. According to CODEPINK co-founder Medea Benjamin, tribal areas in Pakistan have been off limits to foreigners for ten years. And so when CODEPINK’s delegation arrived, despite threats to their lives, hundreds of people had surrounded them, staring — “almost as if we were animals in a zoo,” Benjamin said. “They were so amazed to see Americans who had come there, especially Americans who had come there to denounce the drones. And everyone wanted to touch us, take their picture with us, just interact with us.”

Members of CODEPINK’s delegation spoke continuously about the hospitality they received, and how they were greeted so warmly by the Pakistanis they visited. Benjamin recalled that when the delegation got on stage at a rally, people immediately chanted: “Welcome! Welcome! We want peace! We want peace!”

Benjamin said, “It was so beautiful just to look out there and feel that people are so open to a loving and compassionate message, they want to hear that from Americans. They want really desperately to know that there are Americans who care about their lives.”

Which may not seem like the case as our drones continue to wreak havoc on their lives. As Benjamin said, our drones hover above their skies. Families are scared to go out as well as stay home. They are afraid of sending their children to school, to go to weddings and funerals, which are often drone targets. There is also fear of holding community meetings to talk about these issues because one of their community meetings was once attacked by a drone — killing 42 of the most respected leaders in the community. The drones have also increased depression and suicide throughout the country.

“What is happening in Pakistan is totally unlike the Pakistan I grew up in,” said Samina Sundas, founder and Executive Director of the American Muslim Voice Foundation.

Meanwhile, secrecy continues to surround the drone program and its effectiveness in killing militants. There is an estimate of about 2,600 – 3,400 people killed via drone in Pakistan — only two percent of which were on the U.S. government’s high-value target list. Most of the rest go unnamed and unacknowledged by the U.S. government.

The media, however, reports drones are constantly killing militants, mainly because Obama re-defined the term “militant” to mean every man of military age. In addition, CODEPINK activist Toby Blome said that while in Pakistan, she learned that some militants’ names are used multiple times in news reports to justify drone use. One Pakistani told her a militant’s name was used three times in the media, and exclaimed, “How many times can one man die?”

Still, as Benjamin noted, whether or not drones are “effective” in their mission looks past the fact that our military interventions do not create peace or stability. Pakistani people are living a life of fear under our drones as well as under the Taliban and its rising numbers. Benjamin added, “We see most people join the Taliban not out of ideology but out of despair and revenge.”

British Supreme Court accuses government of war crime


This video is called Extraordinary Rendition [Documentary about War on Terror and Guantanamo Bay / Binyam Mohamed].

From daily News Line in Britain:

Friday, 2 November 2012

UK RENDITION OF PAKISTANI ‘A POSSIBLE WAR CRIME’

The rendition of a Pakistani man by UK and US forces to Afghanistan, and his subsequent detention, has been described by Britain’s highest court as ‘unlawful’ and a possible war crime.

Yunus Rahmatullah, 29, was detained by British forces in Iraq in 2004, and rendered by the US to Bagram prison, Afghanistan, where he remains held without charge or trial to this day.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday unanimously dismissed the British government’s appeal to overturn the writ of habeas corpus issued in his case.

The court criticised the UK government for failing, on no less than three occasions, to request Mr Rahmatullah’s return.

It suggested that these failings may amount to a war crime, stating: ‘The, presumably forcible, transfer of Mr Rahmatullah from Iraq to Afghanistan is, at least prima facie, a breach of article 49 (of the Fourth Geneva Convention).

‘On that account alone, his continued detention post-transfer is unlawful.’

The UK government entered into a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with the US, which said the UK could seek his return if required, to justify his rendition.

The MoU invoked and reinforced the Geneva Conventions which the US has consistently breached when detaining prisoners of the War on Terror.

The Supreme Court therefore held that the British government should have demanded Mr Rahmatullah’s return when they found out he had been unlawfully transferred to Afghanistan, again when the Americans themselves had decided he no longer needed to be detained, and finally again when the war in Iraq ended.

The UK government have sought to argue that, despite the MoU with the US, any attempts to secure Mr Rahmatullah’s release would have been futile.

But the Court said that this argument was ‘unsupported by factual analysis’ and that ‘no evidence was proffered to sustain it’.

The Court identified this as the first time in 150 years when the US (‘a mature democracy’) has ‘dishonoured’ an extradition agreement (para. 14).

The writ of habeas corpus required the UK, as the ‘detaining authority’, to seek Mr Rahmatullah’s release from the United States authorities.

However, the United States failed to act on the writ and it was subsequently discharged.

Efforts to get the writ reinstated were lost in a majority decision in Wednesday’s judgment.

In December 2011, the Court of Appeal overturned the decision of the Divisional Court and agreed that the historic writ of habeas corpus should and can be issued in the case of Mr Rahmatullah.

British forces seized him in February 2004 during an operation against insurgents in Iraq.

The soldiers handed him over to their US counterparts under the Memorandum of Understanding covering how prisoners would be managed.

He was subsequently illegally rendered to Afghanistan.

Mr Rahmatullah was the subject of an embarrassing climbdown in 2009 by the then Defence Secretary John Hutton who had to admit that the government had previously misled the house when it said that it had not been involved in the US practice of Rendition.

In June 2010, a detention review board authorised his release, saying he posed ‘no enduring security threat’ – but he remains in detention.

Although in US custody, the UK is the ‘detaining authority’ pursuant to the 2003 Memorandum of Understanding struck between the UK and US during the invasion of Iraq and remains responsible for Mr Rahmatullah under the Geneva Conventions.

The ancient writ of habeas corpus is a right under English law that dates back to the Magna Carta.

It may be issued on behalf of any prisoner unlawfully detained so as to bring him (originally, his actual person; now more often just the facts of the case) before the High Court, and his release ordered.

Giving the lead judgment in the Supreme Court, Lord Kerr dismissed the government’s arguments that the 2003 MoU was no longer in force.

He also highlighted the contrary position taken by the government in seeking to down-play the import of the MoU in this case when in other cases it had sought to persuade to the Court to attach great weight to these inter-governmental agreements – notably in extradition cases where it has repeatedly relied upon MoUs to send individuals to countries that routinely use torture.

The Justices also debunked the government’s argument that Mr Rahmatullah was not being detained unlawfully.

‘There can be no plausible argument, therefore, against the proposition that there is clear prima facie evidence that Mr Rahmatullah is unlawfully detained and that the UK government was under an obligation to seek his return unless it could bring about effective measures to correct the breaches of the (Geneva Convention) that his continued detention constituted.’

Importantly, the Supreme Court also dismissed the government’s arguments that the Courts should not have issued the writ because it infringed on the ‘forbidden territory’ of foreign and diplomatic affairs.

In doing so, the Supreme Court has upheld the constitutional right of the individual to challenge the lawfulness of their detention through the writ of habeas corpus.

As Lady Hale and Lord Carnwath put it: ‘Where liberty is at stake, it is not the Court’s job to speculate as to the political sensitivities which may be in play.’

Reprieve’s Legal Director Kat Craig said: ‘The UK government has nowhere left to turn.

‘The highest court in the country has expressed serious concerns that grave war crimes may have been committed, as a result of which a police investigation must be initiated without delay.

‘The Court has also found that Yunus Rahmatullah’s detention is unlawful.

‘Mr Ramatullah, who has been imprisoned for over eight years despite being cleared for release by the US itself on the basis that he poses no threat, must now be released immediately.’

Reprieve’s Director Clive Stafford Smith said: ‘This powerful Supreme Court decision has huge ramifications. Clearly there will now have to be a full criminal investigation.

‘But if the US has “dishonoured” its commitment to the UK in this case for the first time in 150 years, and continues to violate law as basic as the Geneva Conventions, this also throws other extradition agreements with the UK into doubt.’

Jamie Beagent, the lawyer at Leigh Day & Co representing Mr Rahmatullah, said: ‘Today’s judgment is a resounding affirmation of the principles of habeas corpus and its importance in defending the liberty of the individual from unbridled executive power.

‘The government’s attempts to row-back on centuries of constitutional development and restrict the reach of habeas corpus has been rejected by the highest Court in the land.

‘Sadly, despite the fact that in international law Mr Rahmatullah remains a British detainee and the United States does not consider him a security threat, our client remains in detention at Bagram.

‘The writ of habeas corpus now upheld by the Supreme Court failed to secure his release as the US failed to act on the writ and it was subsequently discharged.

‘We will be drawing the Supreme Court’s findings to the attention of the Metropolitan Police who are currently investigating our client’s case in relation to offences under the Geneva Conventions Act 1957.

‘We call on the government to engage with the US to bring to an end the ongoing breaches of the Geneva Conventions in our client’s case for which they are responsible.’

Reprieve, the legal charity with whose assistance Leigh Day brought this action on Mr Rahmatullah’s behalf, will continue to campaign for his release and return to his family in Pakistan.

Leigh Day will continue to assist in any way it can to finally bring Mr Rahmatullah’s incarceration to an end.

See also here.

Good Pakistani vulture news


This video says about itself:

Missing Vultures

27 Dec 2011

This is a promo of my 20 minute documentary on the endangered vultures of Pakistan. Once found in the millions throughout Pakistan, they are now at the brink of extinction.

From Wildlife Extra:

Pakistan vultures have turned the corner after Diclofenac ban

The number of critically endangered Long-billed Vultures in Pakistan is beginning to recover

Peregrine Fund study shows that the ban on toxic veterinary drug diclofenac is effective in addressing Asian vulture crisis

October 2012. The number of critically endangered Long-billed Vultures in Pakistan is beginning to recover, thanks to a ban on the use of diclofenac, a veterinary drug that is toxic to vultures, according to a new study by The Peregrine Fund.

99% drop in numbers

Before the 2006 ban, vulture populations in Pakistan, India, and Nepal had dropped by up to 99%. Diclofenac, then a new drug in the veterinary market, was widely used to treat ailing cattle and other livestock, but vultures began dying by the thousands. The birds suffered renal failure after ingesting diclofenac-treated carcasses that had been left in the fields for scavengers.

52% increase after the ban

By 2008, two years after the ban, breeding populations of the Long-billed Vulture at the study sites in Pakistan had increased by up to 52%, the study shows.

“Our results demonstrate for the first time since the onset of the Asian vulture crisis that the ban on veterinary diclofenac is an effective management tool for reversing Long-billed Vulture population declines in the study area,” the authors said.

Long-billed vultures

Long-billed Vultures generally lay eggs in November; fledging occurs mid-March to mid-May.
They nest in colonies of up to 20 pairs.
They are about 3 feet (0.91 m) tall, weigh 12-14 pounds (5.4-6.4 kg), and have a wingspan of 6-8 feet (1.83-2.44 m).
Like all vultures, they have bald heads and broad wings built for soaring great distances with minimal effort.

Catastrophic collapse

The Peregrine Fund discovered in 2003 that diclofenac was responsible for the catastrophic collapse of vulture populations throughout South Asia. The drug was banned for veterinary use in 2006 by India, Pakistan, and Nepal and in 2010 by Bangladesh.

Recent surveys in India indicate that the ban on veterinary use of diclofenac has markedly reduced its levels in livestock carcasses to almost half of what they were prior to and immediately after the ban, but levels remain sufficiently high to continue to be a problem for vultures, the study said.

Long way to go

“Despite this encouraging trend, we have a long way to go to fully recover vulture populations throughout South Asia,” said author Virani, who heads up vulture studies for The Peregrine Fund. “Unfortunately, some livestock owners are illegally using the human version of diclofenac to relieve pain and inflammation in their animals, even when alternatives that are less toxic to vultures are available. Vultures are social animals, so just one contaminated carcass can poison many birds” he said.

Long-billed vulture

The Long-billed Vulture breeding colony studied for this project is located on a series of cliffs in the Karunjhar Hills in Sindh Province on the extreme south-eastern border of Pakistan. For up to two weeks in November and March, researchers counted the number of birds in each age class, occupied nests, unoccupied nests, nestlings, and fledglings.

Results showed that sharp declines between the 2003-04 breeding season and the 2006-07 breeding season began to be reversed in the 2007-08 season and have held steady since, the study said.

Nepal & India

“We are observing similar increases in nest occupancy for White-rumped Vultures in Nepal and Long-billed Vultures in central India, but we need more time to confirm the trends with higher certainty,” the authors said. “The population of Long-billed Vultures in Pakistan may grow to the pre-diclofenac size if adult mortality remains low, nesting continues to generate population recruits, and food availability is sufficient.”

The article, “First evidence that populations of the critically endangered Long-billed Vulture Gyps indicus in Pakistan have increased following the ban of the toxic veterinary drug diclofenac in south Asia,” was written by M. Jamshed I. Chaudry, Darcy L. Ogada, Riffat N. Malike, Munir Z. Virani, and Matthew D. Giovanni. It will be published in the peer-reviewed journal Bird Conservation International and is available online.

‘Extinct’ Tibetan mountain finch rediscovered


Sillem's mountain finch

From the BBC:

22 October 2012 Last updated at 03:02 GMT

Tibetan mountain finch rediscovered after 80 years

By Adrian Pitches Environment correspondent, BBC North-East

It has been missing for 80 years but Sillem’s Mountain Finch has now been rediscovered on the Tibetan plateau by a trekker who was too ill to leave camp.

The mountain finch has been an enigma ever since its discovery in 1929, not least because it wasn’t identified until 1992.

Two specimens of the sparrow-sized grey and white bird with a russet head were collected by Dutch ornithologist Jerome Alexander Sillem on an expedition to the Karakoram mountain range in 1929.

Nowadays this is the disputed border region of China, India and Pakistan and a no-go area for birders.

The specimens were labelled as a race of Brandt’s Mountain Finch (Leucosticte brandti) and consigned to a drawer in the Amsterdam Zoological Museum.

And there they remained until 1992 when a modern-day Dutch ornithologist, Kees Roselaar, opened the drawer and realised the two specimens were a distinctive species in their own right. And he named the new species Leucosticte sillemi – after the original finder.

Fortunate misfortune

But then the trail went cold – until June this year when French nature photographer Yann Muzika was trekking in the Yenigou valley of Qinghai province in China. However, he contracted food poisoning on the eve of departure and was soon confined to camp.

Yann takes up the story: “After the second day, I decided to take a day break and explore the surroundings as much as my condition would allow.

“It was a trek, not a birdwatching trip, but I was nevertheless carrying a camera and a 400mm lens, just in case.

“I came across a flock of Tibetan Rosefinches (Carpodacus roborowskii) and with them there was a single bird that I did not know, resembling a Brandt’s Mountain Finch but with a rufous head instead of dark brown. I took one picture before the bird flew away.

“On my return home, I just downloaded the pictures and left them for a few weeks. I still couldn’t identify the finch but in the Birds of China field guide there was a brief description of Sillem’s Mountain Finch that seemed to match pretty well… but then we were talking of a bird that had not been seen since 1929.

“As I was reaching the limits of my expertise on birds, I sent the picture and others taken during the trek to Krys Kazmierczak who manages the Oriental Bird Images database for the Oriental Bird Club.”

He immediately realised the significance of the “mystery bird” photo that had been emailed to him.

He told BBC News: “When I saw the excellent photo of the mystery bird my immediate thought was Sillem’s Mountain Finch! However, being of a cautious disposition I did quite a bit of checking and consultation with others.

“Now we are pretty sure that it is Sillem’s Mountain Finch, especially since it has been endorsed by Kees Roselaar, who simply said: ‘Fantastic! At last the proof that sillemi still exists’.”

The June 2012 bird was found 1,500km to the east of the original sighting in 1929 and the Oriental Bird Club is now urging birdwatchers to search for the bird above 5,000m over a vast swathe of high altitude Pakistan, China and Tibet.

See also here. And here. And here.