
In 1900, 11-year old Dutch girl Marietje Kessels, after having been raped, was murdered in the Sacred Heart Roman Catholic church in the Noordhoek neighborhood in Tilburg city.
The police investigated a painter working in the church at the time, and the church’s sexton. However, this did not lead to convictions.
They did not investigate other potential suspects: the church’s priest, George van Zinnicq Bergmann, and other clergy.
Dutch NOS TV says:
[Police] research revealed that Marietje had been strangled in a room used for education. There were only two people who had a key to that room, the priest and the sexton.After medical examination had shown that the painter and the sexton had had no sexual intercourse, that left the parish priest. Van der Pol
curator of the Breda museum
says that potential involvement of the priest was hardly studied. He is said to have been protected by relatives working in the judiciary.
Dutch language Wikipedia says about this:
Tilburg’s notables probably believed that clergy were above all suspicion. Especially in socialist and anticlerical circles there were soon rumors and satirical songs in which the priest was blamed.The view that the priest was the perpetrator, is also held by the publicist Ed Schilders, in a 1988 book about the murder, entitled Murder Corner – The murder of Marietje Kessels in a Catholic church.
Today, a surviving relative of Marietje confirms what socialist critics of the police suspected already in 1900. It seems the Roman Catholic hierarchy has covered up the truth about this horrible murder and rape for over a century.
Ms Godelieve Kessels is a surviving niece of Marietje.
Today, NOS TV says:
‘Marietje Kessels killed by priest’Monday, October 3, 2011, 18:10
By home affairs editor Liedeke Morssinkhof
The pastor of the Noordhoek church in Tilburg raped and murdered in 1900 the then 11-year-old Marietje Kessels. This states her niece, the now 71-year-old Godelieve Kessels, in a book which appears this week.
Representatives of the Vatican a few years after the murder confirmed the suspicions of the family, but prohibited the family from doing anything with that knowledge.
In ‘The murder of Marietje Kessels. Why the parents had to keep silent” Godelieve Kessels tells the story of her father Matthieu, Marietje Kessels’ oldest brother. It’s the first time that a member of the family is talking about this issue.
Vatican visit
In Tilburg, she is still world-famous. Manufacturer’s daughter Marietje Kessels, who never came home after dropping off a letter. Two days after her disappearance, she was found in the vault above Noordhoek Church. Naked, raped and murdered. The perpetrator was never caught, but many people in Tilburg were soon convinced that he was the priest Van Zinnicq Bergmann.
The family thinks that as well, according to the book by Godelieve Kessels. Her father, four years old when his sister died, later spoke frequently with his parents over who could have killed Marietje.
Higher-ups in the church hierarchy must have heard about more and more people suspecting the priest. As several years after the murder two delegates from the Vatican came to the Kessels’ family home. They confirmed the suspicions of the family, the priest was the perpetrator. But they asked the family strongly to remain silent. Because, they said, otherwise the whole Catholic Church would be on trial along with the priest. And that surely was not what the family wanted?
According to Godelieve Kessels, only now the time is ripe for revealing this family secret. She says: “I see this in the light of the recent discussions on sexual abuse of children by Roman Catholic clergy. More and more cases come to light and more and more is known about the systematic denial and concealment by the church. My father’s story fits well in this horrifying context of church abuse”.
Historically plausible
Although hard evidence is still lacking, to church historian Peter Nissen the story of the Kessels family is “historically plausible”. It fills precisely the gaps that there were, 111 years later. Moreover, according to him this shows how the Church has dealt for centuries with issues of sexual abuse.
In an essay in the book he explains that within the Catholic Church since the 17th century, the same rules apply to sexual abuse. One is that they handle such complaints themselves, without involvement of the judiciary. Abuse and ways of handling it are thus older than the recent big number of cases.
….
Godelieve Kessels, “The murder of Marietje Kessels. Why the parents had to keep silent. Contact Publishers, ISBN 9789086450374.
See also here.
See also here. According to regional broadcaster Omroep Brabant, Marietje Kessels’ father was afraid that if he would tell the truth about his daughter’s murder, the Roman Catholic Church would ruin his musical instruments’ business.
Dutch Radio 1 calls this “a cover-up, ordered by the pope himself”.
The pope of the cover-up of the murder of Marietje Kessels was Pius X, officially considered a saint by the Roman Catholic church.
Will the Vatican succeed in covering up crimes being perpetrated right now for over a century as well?
Occupy the Vatican? Ms Magazine Blog: here.
USA: Prosecutors go after the church hierarchy by charging Robert Finn of the Kansas City, Mo., diocese with failure to report evidence of child abuse. Might others now follow suit? Here.
Pair reach Vatican in protest march
VATICAN: Two Italians who say they were sexually abused by priests have completed a 340-mile protest march to the Vatican and demanded an independent inquiry.
The trek from Savona in northern Italy to St Peter’s Square took 19 days.
Francesco Zanardi and Alberto Sala arrived in Vatican City today, where they were denied an audience with the Pope.
They handed over a letter demanding the Italian bishops’ conference open the inquiry into priestly sex abuse and draft norms requiring paedophiles be defrocked “without exception.”
http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/news/content/view/full/110588
Australia goes to bat for 1902 pair
Australia: The government said today that it would tell Britain that two Australian soldiers executed in 1902 for war crimes in South Africa were denied fair trials.
The British government rejected a petition in June to pardon Lieutenants Harry Morant and Peter Handcock.
The attorney general is preparing a submission outlining defects in the court-martial.
http://www.morningstaronline.co.uk/index.php/news/content/view/full/110997
BUZZFLASH DAILY HEADLINES
The right-wing American Family Association (AFA) victimizes women twice when it comes to the violence and profound emotional trauma of being raped.
The AFA is vigorously supporting voter approval next week of a Mississippi State constitutional amendment to recognize fertilized eggs as “persons,” thus making abortion – and even certain birth control methods – an act of murder.
In an AFA email for their online newsletter, OneNewsNow.com, there is a link for a story exclaiming: “Rape no excuse for abortion.” Clicking on the story, one meets Ashley Sigrest of Brandon, Mississippi, who was raped and had an abortion, which she now regrets, 13 years ago. Sigrest held a news conference, at which she stated, according to the AFA:
“My rape was nothing compared to what I did to my child,” she stated to the gallery. “What my rapist did to me does not compare to what I chose to do to my baby … out of shame, out of guilt, out of fear because of what a man did to me. Rape is no excuse for abortion….”
As for the rapist, Sigrest says she prays for him every day. And when asked how she will vote on the amendment next Tuesday? “I am going to vote yes – very proudly and very loudly – on 26 [the number of the ballot initiative].”
It is important to remember that allowing a women – the victim of rape, incest, or otherwise – to have an abortion did not in any way prevent Sigrest from having borne the child that was conceived as the result of a heinous crime. That was and is her choice right now in the State of Mississippi and throughout the United States.
But the Mississippi constitutional amendment would forbid victims of rape who do not want to bear a rapist’s child from aborting the violently forced pregnancy.
According to the Feminist Majority Foundation:
“The implications are staggering. By giving constitutional rights to a fertilized egg, the amendment could ban emergency contraception, birth control pills and IUDs as well as all abortions, even in cases of rape, incest, or to save the life of the woman or girl. It could eliminate medical choices for women, such as some cancer treatments or in vitro fertilization. It could allow the state to investigate and even prosecute a woman for a miscarriage. Undoubtedly it would lead to many court cases.”
The amendment is so egregious that even the conservative, heavily anti-abortion Gov. of Mississippi, Haley Barbour, is expressing his “concerns” about the implications of the initiative.
Legalizing “personhood and constitutional rights for a fertilized egg” is taking away those rights from women.
No one forced Sigrest to have an abortion. It was her own personal choice, as it should be.
Mark Karlin
Editor, BuzzFlash at Truthout
Pingback: Dutch cardinal accused of sexual abuse perjury | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: British religious homophobia | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Conservative cardinal covered up clerical child abuse | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Dutch girl murder’s suspect arrested, NOT a refugee | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Wow, shocking!
Yes, indeed. Still, good that this gets uncovered at last.
Pingback: My first anniversary on WordPress | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Most popular posts on this blog in 2012 | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Liebster Award, thank you Barbara! | Dear Kitty. Some blog
Pingback: Religious sexual abuse of girls, new report | Dear Kitty. Some blog