PTSD soldier refuses Afghanistan redeployment


This video is called USA Reality – Police Horses trample Veterans.

As the US marked Veterans Day Thursday, an American soldier who had refused redeployment to Afghanistan over the Army’s failure to treat his Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder turned himself in: here.

Veteran’s wife writes on US military neglect of PTSD victims: here.

Hearings continued Tuesday into charges of murder and other atrocities committed against Afghan civilians by a group of US soldiers stationed in Kandahar: here.

About these ads

26 thoughts on “PTSD soldier refuses Afghanistan redeployment

  1. Report cautions Obama on high cost of Afghan war

    Fri, Nov 12 10:50 AM

    Reuters

    An independent task force cautioned President Barack Obama on Friday about the high cost of the Afghanistan war and said he should consider a narrow military mission if his December review finds the current strategy is not working.

    The 25-member task force, led by former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and former national security adviser Samuel Berger, said it saw “hopeful signs” in Afghanistan, such as improved training of security forces, but other trends were less encouraging.

    “The cloudy picture and high costs raise the question of whether the United States should now downsize its ambitions and reduce its military presence in Afghanistan,” the task force said in a 98-page report.

    “We are mindful of the real threat we face. But we are also aware of the costs of the present strategy. We cannot accept these costs unless the strategy begins to show signs of progress,” said the task force, which was sponsored by the Council on Foreign Relations think tank.

    Dan Markey, a South Asia analyst at the council who was project director for the report, said the findings were a “sober reflection of a Washington consensus that is increasingly skeptical and concerned” about the war.

    The task force was composed of a broad range of former government officials, military leaders, academics and journalists with expertise in the region. The report was not requested by the Obama administration, but the task force did speak to officials involved with the issue.

    The group gave a qualified endorsement to Obama’s ambitious counterinsurgency-style strategy, but only if it is clearly making progress.

    MORE LIMITED MISSION

    “If the December 2010 review of U.S. strategy in Afghanistan concludes that the present strategy is not working, the task force recommends that a shift to a more limited mission at a substantially reduced level of military force would be warranted,” the report said.

    The administration’s current strategy calls for U.S.-led forces, including nearly 100,000 American troops, to disrupt al Qaeda and its Taliban allies while training Afghan military and police to take over security.

    At the same time, foreign civilians are working to help improve Afghan governance in an effort to broaden popular support for the administration.

    As the December review approaches, it is increasingly clear that defense officials believe the war plan is working but needs more time, despite rising casualties and worsening violence.

    Administration officials have begun to downplay Obama’s July 2011 deadline for beginning to hand over security to Afghan forces and withdraw U.S. troops as conditions merit.

    Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said this week they viewed Afghan President Hamid Karzai’s plan to assume full responsibility for the country’s security by 2014 as a realistic goal NATO should endorse at its summit this month.

    Administration officials have indicated the strategy review is likely to bring only tweaks rather than a wholesale reappraisal of the war effort.

    The task force urged the administration to go beyond a narrow evaluation of the places where Afghans may be able to take responsibility for security and also include a “clear-eyed assessment” of whether there is enough progress to conclude the strategy is working.

    “The important thing that the report does is to try to clarify what progress should look like,” Markey said.

    The report urges the administration to answer questions like whether Afghan police and army capabilities have been significantly improved, whether momentum in contested areas has shifted against the insurgency and whether normal life returns to areas once NATO operations have concluded.

    (Editing by Peter Cooney)

  2. Pingback: US veterans protest Chicago NATO summit | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  3. Pingback: US veterans hurt by fireworks | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: More United States soldiers’ suicides | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: War makes soldiers mentally ill | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Drones kill Pakistani civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: US soldiers, PTSD, and union busting | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Drones kill Pakistani civilians | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Maldives raped girl anti-whipping victory | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: US Marine General Smedley Butler against war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: United States veterans’ economic and physical hardship | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: British government recruits child soldiers | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: New poetry books against war, austerity and racism | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  14. Pingback: Young British soldiers traumatized by wars | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  15. Pingback: Australian government censorship about torture | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  16. Pingback: United States Vietnam war veterans demand PTSD justice | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  17. Pingback: Iraq war keeps killing in Fort Hood, Texas | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  18. Pingback: Non-Muslim PTSD soldier kills, Islamophobe calls for massacring Muslims | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  19. Pingback: Fort Hood shooting and mental illness in the United States military | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  20. Pingback: Dutch occupation forces discriminated against Afghan translators | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  21. Pingback: Iraq and the USA, a bloody history | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  22. Pingback: World War I and poppies | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  23. Pingback: Ill-treatment at Guantanamo torture camp continuing | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  24. Pingback: Death penalty for British World War I child soldier | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  25. Pingback: United States Iraq Veterans Against the War | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  26. Pingback: Britain’s wars make veterans with PTSD | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s