13 thoughts on “Malalai Joya on occupied ‘new’ Afghanistan

  1. Prince Harry’s Afghanistan dreams ‘smashed’

    2009-11-29 13:00:00

    Prince Harry’s dreams of returning to front-line duty in Afghanistan have been smashed over security concerns.

    The Royal, who is training to pilot the meanest attack machine in the British Army, the Apache, served ten weeks in the 2007 Afghan War but was pulled out after his presence there was revealed by the media.

    And now, Army top brass fear Taliban infiltration of the Afghan police force may blow the lid on the prince’s presence and put him and his comrades in danger.

    “Getting Harry back on the front line is certainly not a priority right now,” News of the World quoted a military source as saying.

    “The situation there is extremely volatile and an operation involving the third in line to the throne would require a lot of planning and secrecy,” the source added.

    Another high-ranking Whitehall source said: “The negatives of his redeployment far outway the positives. It is not on the agenda.” (ANI)

    http://sify.com/news/prince-harrys-afghanistan-dreams-smashed-news-international-jl3naedccba.html

  2. http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/nov/30/obama-afghanistan-troops

    A troop surge can only magnify the crime against Afghanistan

    If Barack Obama heralds an escalation of the war, he will betray his own message of hope and deepen my people’s pain

    o Malalai Joya
    o guardian.co.uk, Monday 30 November 2009 19.00 GMT

    ——–
    “But I still have hope because, as our history teaches, the people of Afghanistan will never accept occupation.”
    ——–

    After months of waiting, President Obama is about to announce the new US strategy for Afghanistan. His speech may be long awaited, but few are expecting any surprise: it seems clear he will herald a major escalation of the war. In doing so he will be making something worse than a mistake. It is a continuation of a war crime against the suffering people of my country.

    I have said before that by installing warlords and drug traffickers in power in Kabul, the US and Nato have pushed us from the frying pan to the fire. Now Obama is pouring fuel on these flames, and this week’s announcement of upwards of 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan will have tragic consequences.

    Already this year we have seen the impact of an increase in troops occupying Afghanistan: more violence, and more civilian deaths. My people, the poor of Afghanistan who have known only war and the domination of fundamentalism, are today squashed between two enemies: the US/Nato occupation forces on one hand and warlords and the Taliban on the other.

    While we want the withdrawal of one enemy, we don’t believe it is a matter of choosing between two evils. There is an alternative: the democratic-minded parties and intellectuals are our hope for the future of Afghanistan.

    It will not be easy, but if we have a little bit of peace we will be better able to fight our own internal enemies — Afghans know what to do with our destiny. We are not a backward people, and we are capable of fighting for democracy, human and women’s rights in Afghanistan. In fact the only way these values will be achieved is if we struggle for them and win them ourselves.

    After eight years of war, the situation is as bad as ever for ordinary Afghans, and women in particular. The reality is that only the drug traffickers and warlords have been helped under this corrupt and illegitimate Karzai government. Karzai’s promises of reform are laughable. His own vice-president is the notorious warlord Fahim, whom Brad Adams of Human Rights Watch describes as “one of the most notorious warlords in the country, with the blood of many Afghans on his hands”.

    Transparency International reports that this regime is the second most corrupt in the world. The UN Development Programme reports Afghanistan is second last — 181st out of 182 countries — in terms of human development. That is why we no longer want this kind of “help” from the west.

    Like many around the world, I am wondering what kind of “peace” prize can be awarded to a leader who continues the occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan, and starts a new war in Pakistan, all while supporting Israel?

    Throughout my recent tour of the US, I had the chance to meet many military families and veterans who are working to put an end to the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan. They understand that it is not a case of a “bad war” and a “good war” — there is no difference, war is war.

    Members of Iraq Veterans Against War even accompanied me to meet members of Congress in Washington DC. Together we tried to explain the terrible human cost of this war, in terms of Afghan, US and Nato lives. Unfortunately, only a few representatives really offered their support to our struggle for peace.

    While the government was not responsive, the people of the US did offer me their support. And polls confirm that the US public wants peace, not an escalated war. Many also want Obama to hold Bush and his administration to account for war crimes. Everywhere I spoke, people responded strongly when I said that if Obama really wanted peace he would first of all try to prosecute Bush and have him tried before the international criminal court. Replacing Bush’s man in the Pentagon, Robert Gates, would have been a good start — but Obama chose not to.

    Unfortunately, the UK government shamefully follows the path of the US in Afghanistan. Even though opinion polls show that more than 70% of the population is against the war, Gordon Brown has announced the deployment of more UK troops. It is sad that more taxpayers’ money will be wasted on this war, while Britain’s poor continue to suffer from a lack of basic services.

    The UK government has also tried to silence dissent, for instance by arresting Joe Glenton, a British soldier who has refused to return to Afghanistan. I had a chance to meet Glenton when I was in London last summer, and together we spoke out against the war. My message to him is that, in times of great injustice, it is sometimes better to go to jail than be part of committing war crimes.

    Facing a difficult choice, Glenton made a courageous decision, while Obama and Brown have chosen to follow the Bush administration. Instead of hope and change, in foreign policy Obama is delivering more of the same. But I still have hope because, as our history teaches, the people of Afghanistan will never accept occupation.

  3. Pingback: New Zealanders say stop Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  4. Pingback: Australians protest Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  5. Pingback: US Greens in March 20 Afghanistan peace march | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  6. Pingback: Women flogged publicly in ‘new’ Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  7. Pingback: NATO kills Afghan civilians again | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  8. Pingback: Canadian support for Afghan women | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  9. Pingback: Torture and rape in ‘new’ Afghanistan | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  10. Pingback: Africa invaded, terrorism or profits? | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  11. Pingback: German MP’s expelled for opposing Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  12. Pingback: United States ‘liberal’ media pro Afghan war | Dear Kitty. Some blog

  13. Pingback: Bahrain MP sacked for criticizing torture prison | Dear Kitty. Some blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s